psycomd99.bsky.social
@psycomd99.bsky.social
Human behavior research and analysis specialist. Doctor working to alleviate psychosis in youth and adults and guide them towards reengaging with their dreams and passions.
So what terminology should Mike Johnson have used in this early announcement, now that the hunt is on for the names of the co-conspirators?
www.politico.com/live-updates...
Johnson says he didn't use ‘right terminology’ in calling Trump an Epstein ‘informant‘
The speaker made the claim last week in comments to reporters.
www.politico.com
December 25, 2025 at 4:16 AM
So what terminology should Mike Johnson have used in this early announcement now that the hunt is on for the co-conspirators?
www.politico.com/live-updates...
Johnson says he didn't use ‘right terminology’ in calling Trump an Epstein ‘informant‘
The speaker made the claim last week in comments to reporters.
www.politico.com
December 25, 2025 at 4:12 AM
Even though he does not quite meet the recommended intellectual level (bottom left), perhaps Americans could get him this for Christmas, and put the billions of dollars towards healthcare and education.
December 23, 2025 at 1:12 AM
He's just old enough to start playing (see bottom left)!
December 23, 2025 at 12:15 AM
I'm not so sure that "consumers are a lot smarter than..." Enough of a majority of Americans sucked-up the "performative nonsense" that DJT delivered, electing him, and so many continue to succumb to his "shitty content". Problem is, many "consumers" believe that he'll accept the midterm results.
December 22, 2025 at 9:09 PM
2. Putin has already chimed-in about issues with mail-in voting, in support of DJT's comments about this. It is because in addition to boosting Dem. turnout, mail-in voting provides an avenue for visible minorities to cast votes without fear of retribution and fear of being detained on voting days.
December 22, 2025 at 9:00 PM
1.Agreed about the voting. Poor voter turnout may be amplified by ICE suppression/fear for visible minorities. Nevertheless, I'm still searching for an answer to what the recourse will be if/when the midterm results are declared rigged and therefore void by DJT? Watch for an attack on mail-in votes.
December 22, 2025 at 9:00 PM
Published 2017 and updated in 2019, almost 7 years ago. The state of American democracy is very different than it was in 2017-9. And despite the accurate accounts described in the book, I believe that his state today is significantly more acute and thereby the threat to democracy even greater.
December 22, 2025 at 8:45 PM
2/2: This administration is using the intellectually weak (and there's lots of them) to sell freedom while executing policies and technologies that do the exact opposite; remove freedom and place control in the hands of the oligarchs, bait and switch. Sad.
December 21, 2025 at 6:36 PM
1/2: This issue with Americans is that most simply believe that this is just a temporary occurrence and that after midterms or DJT's term, life will return to "normal". People can't conceive of the fact that this could likely be a long-term shift away from democracy and freedom.
December 21, 2025 at 6:36 PM
2/2:
Take it from someone who has lived it.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=CGRQ...
Kasparov’s warning: All signs indicate Trump will not give up power voluntarily
YouTube video by MS NOW
www.youtube.com
December 21, 2025 at 6:00 AM
1/2: Eight years later as authoritarianism takes hold, the choice is for Americans to take extreme steps to try and take back their democracy, or continue to roll over and allow this cabal to dismantle institutions and assume control. Most Americans do not understand what authoritarianism entails.
December 21, 2025 at 6:00 AM
2/2: DJT's mental state along with the power that his admin has harnessed means that firstly, it's unlikely that he would acknowledge defeat in midterms, and more importantly, what will be the recourse if the admin declares it void? The article by F. George essentially lays a base for this scenario.
December 21, 2025 at 4:44 AM
1/2:I'm not really asking anyone, rather suggesting that Americans cannot hinge their bets on blue midterm results because it is unlikely that these would be acknowledged as valid - rigged, fake...The issue is that as with the E. file release, there is no recourse anymore for not following the law.
December 21, 2025 at 4:44 AM
I believe that a careful and thoughtful read of the posts makes the position clear.
December 21, 2025 at 4:16 AM
Victor Orban is another example. That's why it's important to educate and take all steps to motivate the public to revolt. Take the E. Files release - blatant disregard for the law. I fear that midterm results will be similarly disregarded, & the question is: what will be the recourse?
December 21, 2025 at 2:20 AM
One recent account that I heard was from Jonathan Reiner, MD on CNN. Although he stayed away from a diagnosis, he did note his concern over DJT "deteriorating state" and his concerning delivery of the address to the Nation. More of this from others to a wide audience may resonate with Americans.
December 21, 2025 at 1:52 AM
So where have you heard them speaking out? Could you provide a few accounts?
December 21, 2025 at 1:48 AM
Well aware of APA Goldwater Rule. National Security, and the preservation of a democratic republic is exceptional requiring courage & public education, much like the Crime-Fraud Exception to the Attorney-Client Privilege. Authoritarianism is the option, you pick.
www.justia.com/criminal/wor...
The Crime-Fraud Exception to the Attorney-Client Privilege
The attorney-client privilege does not cover statements made by a client to a lawyer that are meant to further or conceal a crime or often fraud.
www.justia.com
December 21, 2025 at 1:21 AM
Precisely, Americans are now operating outside that box. Time for courage to supersede guidelines and regulations. I would suggest that the enormity of this situation would be exceptional, much like the Crime-Fraud Exception to the Attorney-Client Privilege. www.justia.com/criminal/wor...
The Crime-Fraud Exception to the Attorney-Client Privilege
The attorney-client privilege does not cover statements made by a client to a lawyer that are meant to further or conceal a crime or often fraud.
www.justia.com
December 21, 2025 at 12:44 AM
Well aware of that requirement Don't you think that National Security, and the preservation of a democratic republic is an exception that supersedes silence?
December 21, 2025 at 12:27 AM
It is even more frightening how apathetic the public at large is of this cover-up. I'm sorry to say that the American public is apathetic, morally staved, and lacks the courage to stand up to corruption. We will see the culmination of this during the midterms. Incredibly sad and disappointing.
December 21, 2025 at 12:24 AM
So if this is accurate, as a matter of National Security, why are there not hundreds of experts chiming in on his decline and the perils that it brings?
Are American medical professional so apathetic that they refuse to contribute to setting the record straight?
December 21, 2025 at 12:17 AM