Yes I do see that - but it’s not our job to sink to the level of expectation that exists at the moment, it’s to raise those expectations and fight for them.

Apology accepted. I disagree with your political argument however.

You’re welcome to get frustrated when people laugh at the idea of revolution, I’m sure the Tsars and the French monarchy laughed too. I’m a revolutionary socialist, I’m not going to lie about it. Reformists are interviewed every day, I don’t have to join their ranks simply because you want me to.

You set the tone of this conversation champ, not me.

Even from the bit I posted you are still wrong - and you can google the interview yourself.

You’re reacting this way because you were wrong, proven so, and because you said yourself that you’re taking the piss. A bit of introspection on your part is required.

This is now simply projection on your part - maybe you should consider why I reacted so negatively to the fact you completely mischaracterised the words I said, because when you were corrected, you doubled down.

The working class shouldn’t be able to afford a studio apartment near where they work because of a payment they received for child sexual abuse is a genuinely wild take that should be expected coming from the ruling class, not from someone on the left.

They’re so trained to let these people and politicians not even answer their questions but instead say whatever they want and then the network will dutifully broadcast it all over the country.

Carry on then champ

I spent like 4 seconds on just the word revolution and the other 10 minutes of the interview on reform lol - not sure what you actually want here.

If you listen to my response I said yeah 2 is fine, but to get to my ultimate goal we’d need a revolution. You certainly don’t need a revolution to limit home ownership and I never said we did.