@quantumcurious.bsky.social
Reposted
MitID virkede på de-Googlede versioner af Android indtil for nylig, hvor de gennemtvang at det kun fungerer på standard-Android. Så MitID alene har i store træk tvunget alle danskere til at have en amerikansk kontrolleret telefon – paradoksalt nok med en forklaring om at øge sikkerheden.
January 18, 2026 at 10:15 AM
MitID virkede på de-Googlede versioner af Android indtil for nylig, hvor de gennemtvang at det kun fungerer på standard-Android. Så MitID alene har i store træk tvunget alle danskere til at have en amerikansk kontrolleret telefon – paradoksalt nok med en forklaring om at øge sikkerheden.
We need a full blown EU federation now! Only a state will guarantee that an attack on one, is an attack on all. We need a light speed scaling up of defence industriest, and EU Tech sector. The current system is to slow. The EU needs massive reforms to its core structure now, or it will fail...
December 11, 2025 at 1:56 PM
We need a full blown EU federation now! Only a state will guarantee that an attack on one, is an attack on all. We need a light speed scaling up of defence industriest, and EU Tech sector. The current system is to slow. The EU needs massive reforms to its core structure now, or it will fail...
So if the US is teaming up with Russia against Europe, then maybe Europe should team up with China? If the US is cut off from China and European industries, they can't pose a treat to Europe for very long. Just saying. It might says Lockhead Martin on the sticker but...
December 10, 2025 at 8:58 AM
So if the US is teaming up with Russia against Europe, then maybe Europe should team up with China? If the US is cut off from China and European industries, they can't pose a treat to Europe for very long. Just saying. It might says Lockhead Martin on the sticker but...
Yes—again, invention isn’t the same as mass adoption. Predicting the future isn’t an exact science; it’s speculation. No one can predict the stock market with 100% accuracy either. It’s not hard facts, but a range of outcomes worth considering.
March 25, 2025 at 8:45 PM
Yes—again, invention isn’t the same as mass adoption. Predicting the future isn’t an exact science; it’s speculation. No one can predict the stock market with 100% accuracy either. It’s not hard facts, but a range of outcomes worth considering.
Have you looked at Tesla's FSD in the U.S. recently? The progress is impressive—and fast. Sure, Boston Dynamics leads in robot agility, but Tesla’s edge is scalable, low-cost production. That’s where Optimus could matter. Producing advanced tech affordably is one of Elon’s strengths.
March 25, 2025 at 8:42 PM
Have you looked at Tesla's FSD in the U.S. recently? The progress is impressive—and fast. Sure, Boston Dynamics leads in robot agility, but Tesla’s edge is scalable, low-cost production. That’s where Optimus could matter. Producing advanced tech affordably is one of Elon’s strengths.
Of course he’s a great salesman he’s American. But he’s close Elon Musk, a longtime friend and former student. So Musk’s outlook may be shaped by his views.
Wireless tech existed, but predicting global consumer internet by 2010 in 1990 was still impressive Invention isn’t the same as mass adoption.
Wireless tech existed, but predicting global consumer internet by 2010 in 1990 was still impressive Invention isn’t the same as mass adoption.
March 25, 2025 at 8:37 PM
Of course he’s a great salesman he’s American. But he’s close Elon Musk, a longtime friend and former student. So Musk’s outlook may be shaped by his views.
Wireless tech existed, but predicting global consumer internet by 2010 in 1990 was still impressive Invention isn’t the same as mass adoption.
Wireless tech existed, but predicting global consumer internet by 2010 in 1990 was still impressive Invention isn’t the same as mass adoption.
Unfortunately, I believe your spot on.
Also, the geopolitical rules based order only works, when there is someone strong enough and willing to enforce it. That is becoming brutaly clear to such one's as myself who has not known anything else and taken it for granted.
Also, the geopolitical rules based order only works, when there is someone strong enough and willing to enforce it. That is becoming brutaly clear to such one's as myself who has not known anything else and taken it for granted.
March 25, 2025 at 7:02 PM
Unfortunately, I believe your spot on.
Also, the geopolitical rules based order only works, when there is someone strong enough and willing to enforce it. That is becoming brutaly clear to such one's as myself who has not known anything else and taken it for granted.
Also, the geopolitical rules based order only works, when there is someone strong enough and willing to enforce it. That is becoming brutaly clear to such one's as myself who has not known anything else and taken it for granted.
Kick the ball not the man🙂🤷♂️
March 25, 2025 at 6:37 PM
Kick the ball not the man🙂🤷♂️
From a U.S. perspective, market access isn’t enough. It's about securing strategic control and denying rivals like China access. Canada and Greenland are open through market ( for now ) but sovereign. Russia isn't an ally their China's. The U.S. seeks reliable access and leverage over competitors.
March 25, 2025 at 6:36 PM
From a U.S. perspective, market access isn’t enough. It's about securing strategic control and denying rivals like China access. Canada and Greenland are open through market ( for now ) but sovereign. Russia isn't an ally their China's. The U.S. seeks reliable access and leverage over competitors.