- what else does it affect? Underarm sweat. Colostrum. ATP (energy source) binding and transport. Stuff we don't generally want to mess with.

So, yeah. eugenics is still bad.

Of those traits we have total knowledge, most of the genetic data is multi-purpose. Changing that will result in changing other aspects in ways we do not want and cannot expect. For example: ear eax. Do you prefer wet or dry? Well to change that gene is just one nucleotide! Just one! But -

Congenital diseases and disorders are far more complicated than just switching off a few genes, more problems always arise. One better option is gene therapy. Haemophilia A and B are treatable by gene therapy, as are several types of cancer. We don't need eugenics, we never have and never will.

At this point, our intro comp/first-year English course has been so heavily revised, it no longer includes a novel, or "extended reading" of any kind, no "specialized" or "historical" reading, mostly in-class assignments, no research essay...and we are still seeing a 40-50% rate of AI misconduct.

When I ask them: "What are you reading? What are you watching? What are you listening to?" Often, the answer is: nothing. Which has a direct effect on their over-use of prompts and AI, because they can't think of ideas, because they are literally not engaging with a single figurative thing.

is it just me or does the guy actually just look like a nazi, as if he cosplays in WW2 German memorabilia in his spare time, alone and without context? he has that air in his photos.