But, Will, have you tried assuming what she did was in good faith? Just look at her tenure running the Free Press!

*Checks free press articles*

...oh no...

...oh no, no, no, no, no...

Ok, yeah, the one guy who is the exception lol ;)

Honestly, happy to yell at you being a mark here and NOT clicking your awful article :)

Exactly! We we advocate and seek justice for victims, that still puts the perpetrators in a bind.

Trump can deny all he wants. When his victims get justice, all his denials are for naught.

San Diego is just a black hole for careers. No notoriety can escape it.

Shit, you mean there's voters out there that don't use Twitter who would wanna vote in an election!?

There are voters who aren't right of center!? And those voters may be largely ignored and untapped for mobilizing!?

I mean, she is the kind of person who thought "I must do everything I can to defend the people in charge of this process of genociding Palestinians"

She's the kind of person to think "I must to everything I can to harass Arab people"

of course none of this controversy is about defending or explaining journalism or human rights investigations—it’s about a group of powerful people who want to reserve the right to deny reality, however poorly, whenever they want to or are told to

She thought the principles of this report were the fucking administration, not the people tortured at CECOT.

She can't see regular people as having lives worthy of interest.

And now she is once again finding out how much she doesn't understand regular people.

Of course, that'd require to think people without money or power have humanity. She comes off as seeing vulnerable people as sort of background characters.

She wants her audience to be the kind of people on the Marc Andresson group chats. Her insipid "Things that matter" series, her pouncing to do that Erika Kirk interview and whatever the heck was her other useless one. This is all shit those CHUDS care about.