Robbie DeLacy
@rdelacy.bsky.social
Cis-ish het dude. Mostly reskeets of people smarter than me. I do not automatically follow back. You have to earn my follow. He/him.
I love how obvious it is that they’re all trying to force themselves to enjoy it and failing miserably.
February 8, 2026 at 12:03 PM
I love how obvious it is that they’re all trying to force themselves to enjoy it and failing miserably.
*His* religion bars it. That does not matter to her, and she doesn’t need his permission to survive. The fact that he’d rather she be dead than break HIS religion’s rules shows exactly how much he respects her.
February 8, 2026 at 5:42 AM
*His* religion bars it. That does not matter to her, and she doesn’t need his permission to survive. The fact that he’d rather she be dead than break HIS religion’s rules shows exactly how much he respects her.
Selective Service being required only for men is not misandry. It’s actually because *misogyny* has led society to believe that women are unfit for the military. Feminists have also been arguing for its abolition for decades, while “men’s rights activists” have not.
February 8, 2026 at 5:32 AM
Selective Service being required only for men is not misandry. It’s actually because *misogyny* has led society to believe that women are unfit for the military. Feminists have also been arguing for its abolition for decades, while “men’s rights activists” have not.
That’s just not true.
February 8, 2026 at 5:30 AM
That’s just not true.
That’s not misandry. It’s actually because misogyny has systematically kept women out of the jobs with that kind of risk.
February 8, 2026 at 5:30 AM
That’s not misandry. It’s actually because misogyny has systematically kept women out of the jobs with that kind of risk.
Reposted by Robbie DeLacy
To be clear, misandry does not exist any more than “reverse racism” exists.
There are individual women’s opinions about men, but there is no structural oppression/denigration of men.
There are individual women’s opinions about men, but there is no structural oppression/denigration of men.
February 5, 2026 at 7:28 PM
To be clear, misandry does not exist any more than “reverse racism” exists.
There are individual women’s opinions about men, but there is no structural oppression/denigration of men.
There are individual women’s opinions about men, but there is no structural oppression/denigration of men.
It’s supposed to happen today, but you haven’t posted. I can only think of two possible reasons for that. Either it was never real, or nobody showed up and you’re too embarrassed to talk about it. The former is more likely, but I’m hoping it’s the latter, because that’s way funnier.
February 7, 2026 at 9:21 PM
It’s supposed to happen today, but you haven’t posted. I can only think of two possible reasons for that. Either it was never real, or nobody showed up and you’re too embarrassed to talk about it. The former is more likely, but I’m hoping it’s the latter, because that’s way funnier.
Slander is for spoken words. If they’re written, it’s libel. But it’s not libel if it’s true, and given how much you exploded under the barest pressure, it most certainly is true.
February 7, 2026 at 10:54 AM
Slander is for spoken words. If they’re written, it’s libel. But it’s not libel if it’s true, and given how much you exploded under the barest pressure, it most certainly is true.