Ben Hyman
@revisenretweet.bsky.social
820 followers 140 following 18 posts
Economist @UCLA / @CAPolicyLab, formerly @NYFedResearch. @Wharton PhD. Research: Labor, PF, urban/spatial. Futbol: @OL, @ChelseaFC. W: benhyman.com
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
revisenretweet.bsky.social
inally, this paper is co-authored with two fantastic graduate students, one of which (@karenxni.bsky.social) will be on the job market this year! We plan to make all data in this paper publicly available, and hope this is the beginning of a rich research agenda in this area. 🧵/🧵
revisenretweet.bsky.social
Overall, this early look at natn'l job training efforts to accelerate worker adjustment to AI offers some optimism, but returns are higher when workers avoid AI skills altogether. Future work will need to disentangle if effects may differ for on-the-job training w/in firms. 12/🧵
revisenretweet.bsky.social
The distribution of training participants is also occupationally representative of the nation. This + the large scale of the job training data allow us to cautiously infer to the national population of CPS unemployed workers. 11/🧵
revisenretweet.bsky.social
Although WIOA training participants are mostly low income, they are highly AI exposed. The modal participant displaces from the top quintile of occups in AI-exposure ('5' on the x-axis). Many workers in this quintile were cashiers or customer service reps before training. 10/🧵
revisenretweet.bsky.social
More descriptives: high earnings returns are concentrated in the most recent years when labor mrkts were exceptionally tight ➡️ training may carry stronger signal value when firms have to reach deeper into the skill market. Or it may reflect changes in AI—an open question! 9/🧵
revisenretweet.bsky.social
We find that 25-40% of occupations are “AI retrainable” (high sahre!). Some occupations (e.g. paralegals) rank higher b/c workers earn more when moving to higher AI-content work, and others (e.g. customer service reps), rank lower because workers are forced to move down in AI-content. 8/🧵
revisenretweet.bsky.social
Using our matched sample, we construct an AI Retrainability (AIR) index ranking occups by the share of retrained workers earning ⬆️ wages despite moving into AI-intensive roles. We then ask whether AIR is driven by earnings gains holding AI skills constant, or AI upskilling. 7/🧵
revisenretweet.bsky.social
Our main finding is that while workers leaving AI‑exposed occups see strong earnings returns from training (~$1500/qtr, large estimates!), AI‑specific retraining delivers 29% lower returns vs. general training ➡️ frictions in acquiring skills used by AI-intensive occups. 6/🧵
revisenretweet.bsky.social
We assemble a new dataset of 1.6m+ job training spells from the Workforce Innovation & Opportunity Act (WIOA) linked to AI exposure measures by @erikbryn.bsky.social , @danielrock.bsky.social , & co-authors. We then analyze earnings returns to training by pre-separation AI exposure. 4/🧵
revisenretweet.bsky.social
This paper shines early light on the effectiveness of job training for workers in occs. exposed to AI before job loss, and for those who target AI-intensive occs. in their next jobs (presumably by acquiring AI-compatible skills that safeguard against future job loss). See ⬇️ 3/🧵
revisenretweet.bsky.social
While much attention has been paid to the potential impact of AI on headcounts, there is next to no evidence on the adjustment margin firms most commonly pursue to accommodate AI technology: reskilling workers for AI. (See e.g., firm survey results w/ Fed colleagues below). 2/🧵
Reposted by Ben Hyman
benkeys.bsky.social
An accessible summary of my recent research on housing, climate risk, and insurance:

www.nber.org/reporter/202...
Housing, Climate Risk, and Insurance
www.nber.org
revisenretweet.bsky.social
CA spends three times as much on film tax credits as it does on discretionary business incentives for all remaining industries, ***combined***. One day, my paper on film tax credits will come out...
revisenretweet.bsky.social
Any good IO Papers on lawsuit competition as deterrent? Asking as a consumer, not producer
Reposted by Ben Hyman
nber.org
NBER @nber.org · Jan 15
Open call for papers, Fiscal Dynamics of State and Local Governments. Conference to be held in Cambridge, MA on September 11-12, 2025. Submit papers by 11:59pm EDT on February 27, 2025. More information: https://www.nber.org/calls-papers-and-proposals/fiscal-dynamics-state-and-local-governments
revisenretweet.bsky.social
First post where the sky is blue, so I figured I'd share some good news. Happy to have received two hard-earned R&Rs over the last few weeks.

Been around long enough to know that R&Rs are only half the battle, but to all my juniors / late bloomers, just a message to keep your head down & spirit up!