If there had been it wouldn't have been positive.

Call it a win.

Not until he understands how tariffs work and realises who actually pays them.

Just genuinely nuts.

Definitely not cool at all.

Isn’t there also a question of where the liability lies? My understanding is that it’s the GP’s medical indemnity insurance that has to cover PAs decisions as, in theory, the GP signs off on the PAs decisions? Please clarify if I’ve got this wrong.

If you could take the fourteen years of everything that happened and we experienced under the Tory government, slowly concentrated it down then drew it up into a syringe and injected it into someone, you’d have made Liz Truss.

More of an achievable threshold amongst his supporting cohort than intelligence would be.

The introduction of PAs is something borrowed from the US. Over there, it is very transparent and everyone knows when they are seeing one. They have a role and can be useful with the right experience.

It’s their opaque use here as an obvious cost saving exercise that is frightening and dangerous.

Simply that people born much later than the events we wish to avoid repeating have no feel for their impact even to the point where they’re prepared to question aspects of them.

That, and stability not suiting their own agenda.

I’d say less nightmares. More Brie-zzare dreams.

I’m here all week.

Click on and following all of these accounts is like going round and resetting all the clock when they go back.

Satisfyingly reassuring to put everything back as it was before.

In the UK, we're yet to be subjected, however, I'm definitely now feeling it for little ones.

Agreed

I did find that it was easier to get a little bit of engagement on Threads compared to screaming into the abyss on Twitter. Hopefully Bluesky will be nicer too.