androgynous vampire enthusiast
LightNews LightNews
banner
riotlinguist.bsky.social
androgynous vampire enthusiast
@riotlinguist.bsky.social
7K followers 280 following 8.9K posts
anarchist. sad and angry all the time. transfeminism enjoyer. trans genderqueer, TME. they/them.

read some stuff: immerautonom.noblogs.org

https://ko-fi.com/narcissus_andtheircats
Posts Replies Media Videos
riotlinguist.bsky.social
“It's both possible, and even necessary, to simultaneously enjoy media while also being critical of its more problematic or pernicious aspects" was such a simple message that was so thoroughly and viciously rejected, but i think many of you still need to learn it
picture of anita sarkeesian from her series "feminist frequency," wearing a pale plaid top, hoop earrings, and a ponytail, as she speaks to the camera.
November 22, 2025 at 9:42 PM
riotlinguist.bsky.social
the "power and control" or "cycle of abuse" wheel depicting cycles of domestic and intimate partner violence. the cycle goes: 1. "explosion: physical, sexual, and/or emotional abuse." 2 "remorse: guilt, apologies, promises, justifying excuses." 3. "honeymoon: affection, adoration, gift-giving, helpful, compliments." 4. "tension: moody, nitpicking, criticisms, threats, gaslighting, mindgames." and then it circles back to 1.
November 19, 2025 at 8:42 PM
riotlinguist.bsky.social
it's the same rhetorical move as "if harvey weinstein really raped those women, why did they thank him in their oscar speeches? why did they go back and work with him? why are they smiling in their pictures? if the survivor was really abused why did they go back to their abuser?" abuse apologia 101.
Leaving an abusive relationship is never easy – and it isn't always the safest option. In fact, survivors of abuse return to their abusive partners an average of seven times before they leave for good. That may sound unbelievable or unreasonable to a person who has never experienced abuse.
November 19, 2025 at 7:36 PM
riotlinguist.bsky.social
also in case you're wondering: yes obviously people were uploading kids into the face swap thing.

also some of the files contained the full first and last names of victims.

again, this is the fully openly advertised purpose of the app
Some of the faces in the faceswap containers are recognizable in the generations in the "live photos" container, which appears to be outputs generated by Secret Desires and are almost entirely hardcore pornographic Al-generated videos. In this container, multiple videos feature extremely young-looking people having sex. The prompts exposed by some of the file names are also telling of how some people use Secret Desires. Several prompts in the faceswap container, visible as file names, showed users' "secret desire" was to generate images of underage girls: "17-year-old, high school junior, perfect intricate detail innocent face," several prompts said, along with names or young female celebrities. We know from hacks of other "Al girlfriend" platforms that this is a popular demand of these tools; Secret Desires specifically says on its terms of use that it forbids generating underage images. the faceswap container, I found a file photo of a state representative speaking in public, photos where women took mirror selfies seemingly years ago with flip phones and Blackberries, screenshots of selfies from Snapchat, a photo of a woman posing with her university degree and one of a yearbook photo. Some of the file names include full first and last names of the women pictured.
November 19, 2025 at 5:39 PM
riotlinguist.bsky.social
needs highlighting: this isn't like a preditable but plausibly deniable outcome. non-consensual imagery of real people you encounter, like "that girl at the gym" is the explicitly advertised POINT of the app.
Secret Desire runs advertisements on Youtube where it markets the platform’s ability to create sexualized versions of real people you encounter in the world. “AI girls never say no,” an AI-generated woman says in one of Secret Desire’s YouTube Shorts. “I can look like your favorite celebrity. That girl from the gym. Your dream anime character or anyone else you fantasize about? I can do everything for you.” Most of Secret Desires’ ads on YouTube are about giving up on real-life connections and dating apps in favor of getting an AI girlfriend. “What if she could be everything you imagined? Shape her style, her personality, and create the perfect connection just for you,” one says.
November 19, 2025 at 5:35 PM
riotlinguist.bsky.social
it's easy to forget just how completely normal everyone was about it
post on twitter from Normy Wormy @weaklilgr… (the rest of the handle is cut off): Chili Neighbor is a neurodivergent nightmare scenario because it's an autistic person sharing what they (correctly) think is, according to the social script, a spontaneous act of kindness and then the entire world gets absolutely furious at them for no reason. reply from Yadira @SensuOuroborous: I think my only problem was that the chinchilla was a shady person and acted like a mom followed by another tweet from Yadira @SensuOuroborous: Like I don't think it's bad to be grossed out by incest undertones
November 19, 2025 at 8:34 AM
riotlinguist.bsky.social
even if you wanna try to try to rescue 1 corinthians 6:9 (lol) by claiming it's mistranslated or it can't be referring to "homosexuality" because it only talks about male homosexuality and doesn't mention lesbianism, etc, none of tht rescues romans 1:26-27
Romans 1:26 - That is why God abandoned them to their shameful desires. Even the women turned against the natural way to have sex and instead indulged in sex with each other. Romans 1:27 - And the men, instead of having normal sexual relations with women, burned with lust for each other. Men did shameful things with other men, and as a result of this sin, they suffered within themselves the penalty they deserved.
November 18, 2025 at 2:51 AM
riotlinguist.bsky.social
you can click "tools" next to the verse and click on each individual word or phrase to see the original text that's being translated, how it's being translated, and a link to its entry in the Strong's Concordance. here's malakos:
Outline of Biblical Usage [?] 1. soft, soft to the touch Il. metaph. in a bad sense 1. effeminate A. of a catamite B. of a boy kept for homosexual relations with a man C. of a male who submits his body to unnatural lewdness D. of a male prostitute
November 18, 2025 at 1:00 AM
riotlinguist.bsky.social
here's all the translations you can check, i bet you haven't even heard of most of them. now if it were one mistranslation in 1946, why would all these other scholars who have retranslated it since then be saying the same thing? why would the pre-1946 translations say "effeminates"?
screenshot of the available bible translations that can be cross-referenced using strong's concordance KJV NKJV ESV CSB LSB AMP ASV HNV LXX YLT VUL MGNT BES CHT LUT RVR09 EM RST NLT NASB20 NET DBY NAV TR RVR60 KOR SE NIV NASB95 RSV WEB WLC SVD BBE LS LUT RST SE
November 18, 2025 at 12:58 AM
riotlinguist.bsky.social
i'm afraid the KJV predates 1946 and unmistakably says "effeminates and those who defile themselves with [the male sex]," it was already homophobic before then.

here's the ESV:
Or do you not know that the unrighteous(fn will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality, finl The two Greek terms translated by this phrase refer to the passive and active partners in consensual homosexual acts
November 18, 2025 at 12:51 AM
riotlinguist.bsky.social
KJV, NKJV, New Living Translation, New International Version (notice the "translation note"--it says "both active and passive partners")
King James Version of 1 Corinthians 6:9 - Know ye not that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Be not deceived: neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor abusers of themselves with mankind, New King James Version of 1 Corinthians 6:9 - Do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived. Neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor homosexuals in| nor sodomites, New Living Translation of 1 Corinthians 6:9 - Don't you realize that those who do wrong will not inherit the Kingdom of God? Don't fool yourselves. Those who indulge in sexual sin, or who worship idols, or commit adultery, or are male prostitutes, or practice homosexuality, New International Version of 1 corinthians 6:9 - Or do you not know that wrongdoers will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: Neither the sexually immoral nor idolaters nor adulterers nor men who have sex with men
November 18, 2025 at 12:49 AM
riotlinguist.bsky.social
tweet from user Evan Kilgore @EvanAKilgore saying "Yes, I voted for this. We are so back. 🇺🇸" with an attached image of donald trump standing behind a podium holding a big list of tariffs. Evan Kilgore @EvanAKilgore saying "This is what I voted for. 🇺🇸🌳" in reply to a tweet from user johnny maga @_johnnymaga which reads "Greatest of all time. ❤️🌳" with two attached pictures of trump digging a hole to plant a tree. Evan Kilgore @EvanAKilgore on twitter: "The Government just fucked my family's livelihood. Literally destroyed it overnight with the Hemp provision. 1 will not be voting in 2026 or 2028. The GOP sucks and will sell out to lobbies and Big donors at the expense of the American people. Fuck the Government."
November 17, 2025 at 10:26 AM
riotlinguist.bsky.social
oh no you don't @mrfunkypunkie.bsky.social.

bsky.app/profile/tali...
meme of darkseid stopping superman from walking away by casually grabbing his cape
November 17, 2025 at 6:39 AM
riotlinguist.bsky.social
at least i appreciate this confirmation that samus is still canonically 6'3"
a shot from the new metroid prime 4 gameplay footage, during a short cutscene where samus reaches out her hand to take a data chip from the annoying ass NPC, mackenzie. she is noticably several inches taller than him
November 15, 2025 at 8:20 AM
riotlinguist.bsky.social
in some cases, a child can be legally forcibly married with their parents' and then LEGALLY BARRED FROM GETTING A DIVORCE. so not only is sexual abuse *literally legal* with parental permission via marriage, but it can become ILLEGAL for a child to flee their abuser.
Between 2000 and 2018, some 300,000 minors were legally married in the United States.[23] The vast majority of child marriages (reliable sources vary between 78% and 95%) were between a minor girl and an adult man.[23][24][25] In many cases, minors in the U.S. may be married when they are under the age of sexual consent, which varies from 16 to 18 depending on the state.[26] In some states, minors cannot legally divorce or leave their spouse, and domestic violence shelters typically do not accept minors.[27][28][29]
November 14, 2025 at 8:56 PM
riotlinguist.bsky.social
and another one!! the MOST woke thing these cis boys (i checked) can think of is UBI?? unbelievably weak
Universal basic income now. Talia "Estro Junkies" Bhatt 99 @taliabhatt.itch.io • 10m @ fae/faer @ she/her xe/xir • xe/xem "my least woke opinion is---" That's enough. We've had enough people indulging in the "thrill of a little conservatism", as a treat. Of considering reactionary thought to be a salacious and taboo in a world descending into reactionary mania. Give me your MOST woke opinions. We're bringing it back.
November 14, 2025 at 9:22 AM
riotlinguist.bsky.social
not to be rude to this guy but if this is your MOST woke opinion.... woof. failed the assignment bro
The economy is incredibly broken. We should move to universal basic income. Talia "Estro Junkies" Bhatt 9& @taliabhatt.itch.io • 2m @faelfaer @ shelher © xe/xir © xe/xem "my least woke opinion is---" That's enough. We've had enough people indulging in the "thrill of a little conservatism", as a treat. Of considering reactionary thought to be a salacious and taboo in a world descending into reactionary mania. Give me your MOST woke opinions. We're bringing it back.
November 14, 2025 at 9:14 AM
riotlinguist.bsky.social
"gyneconemist"

"maybe borrow one from clinton?"
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029973 📁 001 📄 Page 1 From: Jennifer Jacquet Sent: 8/4/2011 8:21:25 PM To: Jeffrey Epstein [jeeyacation@gmail.com] Subject: Re: Importance: High Yuck. Maybe borrow one from Clinton? On Aug 4, 2011, at 4:17 PM, Jeffrey Epstein wrote: i would need my speculumator to gauge accurately On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 10:09 PM, Jennifer Jacquet < > wrote: Well, you're the gyneconomist. Better get to work. On Aug 4, 2011, at 4:05 PM, Jeffrey Epstein wrote: they are being feminized. On Thu, Aug 4, 2011 at 10:01 PM, Jennifer Jacquet 1> wrote: Richard and I have already been in touch about the transfer to the project I work with here at UBC, and it seems there is no problem (I'll check with our admin right now). Thank you, though! p.s. What the heck is happening to the financial markets and how are you going to help? On Aug 4, 2011, at 3:40 PM, Jeffrey Epstein wrote: john and i agree that maybe you shoudl take money from edge. as opposed to me „ if it helps
November 13, 2025 at 5:55 AM
riotlinguist.bsky.social
just sending each other bitter little "jokes" about persecuted MeToo men huh

(this one is in response to an article about a "women of the world" conference)
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 011904 From: Lawrence Krauss Sent: 4/5/2018 10:16:55 PM To: jeffrey E. [jeeyacation@gmail.com] Subject: Re: Importance: High Let's do a men of the world conference. Kevin spacey Bill Clinton Al franken Woody Allen Lawrence M. Krauss Director, The Origins Project at ASU Foundation Professor School of Earth & Space Exploration and Physics Department Arizona State University, P.O. Box 871404. Tempe. AZ 85287-1404 origins.asu.edu | twitter.comilkrauss||krauss.faculty.asu.edu Sent from my iPhone On Apr 5, 2018, at 2:04 PM, Lawrence Krauss Enjoy. Lawrence M. Krauss Director, The Origins Project at ASU Foundation Professor School of Earth & Space Exploration and Physics Department Arizona State University, P.O. Box 871404, Tempe, AZ 85287-1404
November 13, 2025 at 5:49 AM
riotlinguist.bsky.social
"woody and soon yi coming for dinner tonight. m" woof
HOUSE OVERSIGHT 022660 From: Michael Wolff Sent: 1/9/2015 6:33:09 PM To: jeffrey E. [jeeyacation@gmail.com] Subject: Re: Importance: High Is Clinton willing to say he was not there? Btw, I've just filed a column for USA Today for Monday explaining how Dershowitz and Andrew allegations were picked up from unverified civil court docs, transferred to UK tabs, which go wild because of no libel rules on U.S. court papers, and then translated back here as "reported fact." Problem with story is that tabs are too invested in present story line, and unlikely that the Times or WSJ will want to touch it--tho, depending on who is willing to on record, they might. There is another politico reporter I know who might do it, again, if the on-the-record sources are public people. Or, I will use it for New York Magazine, but that won't be until Feb. Can you still talk tomorrow? When works? Woody and Soon-Yi coming for dinner tonight. m
November 13, 2025 at 5:47 AM
riotlinguist.bsky.social
oh no you don't, coward
Mike Borden @aldebaran26.bsky.social Since the 90s, we've literally seen the women Bill Clinton likes. He likes his women on the bigger boned side with generous posteriors. Diddling, yes. Kid diddling, yeah no. Doctor Memory @blank.org This. If you were an adult in the 90s you are painfully familiar with what Slick Willie's type is, and "underaged bikini model" wasn't it.
November 13, 2025 at 3:24 AM
riotlinguist.bsky.social
WARNINGGGG!!! this is a GRAPHIC VIOLENT IMAGE of people with their EYES GOUGED OUT
poster for the film "parasite," featuring the film's characters standing around outside the opulent house that is the setting, each with a censor bar placed over their eyes
November 12, 2025 at 9:43 AM
riotlinguist.bsky.social
...aggression????

lot to unpack here--spinning "a bunch of workers died in horrific conditions" as a positive & gendered story of heroism for one--but trying to sneak in "cis male aggression is good" into a story about a fairly non-aggressive activity (building stuff) is some sleight of hand
November 9, 2025 at 10:03 PM
riotlinguist.bsky.social
"did women ruin the workplace?" - Joseph Literal Goebbels, 1933 "On German Womanhood"
The woman has always been not only the man’s sexual companion, but also his fellow worker. Long ago, she did heavy labor with the man in the field. She moved with him into the cities, entering the offices and factories, doing her share of the work for which she was best suited. She did this with all her abilities, her loyalty, her selfless devotion, her readiness to sacrifice. The woman in public life today is no different than the women of the past. No one who understands the modern age would have the crazy idea of driving women from public life, from work, profession, and breadwinning. But it must also be said that those things that belong to the man must remain his. That includes politics and the military. That is not to disparage women, only a recognition of how she can best use her talents and abilities. Looking back over the past years of Germany’s decline, we come to the frightening, nearly terrifying, conclusion that the less German men were willing to act as men in public life, the more women succumbed to the temptation to fill the role of the man. The feminization of men always leads to the masculinization of women. An age in which all great idea of virtue, of steadfastness, of hardness, and determination have been forgotten should not be surprised that the man gradually loses his leading role in life and politics and government to the woman. It may be unpopular to say this to an audience of women, but it must be said, because it is true and because it will help make clear our attitude toward women. The modern age, with all its vast revolutionary transformations in government, politics, economics, and social relations has not left women and their role in public life untouched. Things we thought impossible several years or decades ago are now everyday reality. Some good, noble, and commendable things have happened. But also things that are contemptible and humiliating. These revolutionary transformations have largely taken from women their proper tasks.
November 9, 2025 at 9:46 PM
riotlinguist.bsky.social
every time one of these wastrel losers opens their mouth to whine and wheedle that men simply naturally "need" to be the boss of women and fathers simply "need" to be the masters of the home it only further convinces me that capital-F Fathers and Fatherhood must be totally abolished as a concept.
In “Of Boys and Men,” Reeves, a fellow at the Brookings Institution, draws on the work of the late British sociologist Geoff Dench, who posited that the “fundamental weakness of feminist analysis” is its failure “to see that men may need the status of the main provider role to give them a sufficient reason to become fully involved, and stay involved, in the longer-term draggy business of family life.” And Reeves co-signs the supply-side economist George Gilder’s hypothesis that, once wives become “both provider and procreator,” their husbands become “exiles” in their own homes. Reeves mostly rejects Gilder and Dench’s line of revanchist patriarchy, but he credits them for correctly diagnosing “the dangers of anomie and detachment among men stripped of their traditional role.” In an age when two out of every five households have a female primary breadwinner, no one seems to know “what fathers are for,”
November 9, 2025 at 9:06 PM