We do understand your concerns about fairness in the job market, but e’re directing our energy at very different parts of the problem. The poem is a response to that misdirection, absoltely not a call to defend it.

If we truly wanted to end abuse, we’d be regulating corporations, capping rents, ending zero-hour contracts—not surveilling the most vulnerable people in the country while landlords and billionaires carry on untouched.

Not at all what the poem says. Nowhere in the sonnet we defending exploitation or illegal employment practices. Quite the opposite. The poem critiques the political theatre of targeting migrant delivery riders instead of the powerful systems and profiteers that create and sustain inequality.

Nowhere in the sonnet are we defending exploitation. The poem critiques the political theatre of targeting migrant delivery riders instead of the profiteers that create inequality. If we truly wanted to end abuse, we’d focus corporations not surveilling the most vulnerable people in the country.

It does :)