Robert Saunders (aka McMullen)
@roberthmcmullen.bsky.social
400 followers 250 following 200 posts
Author of "stranger and stranger”, letter writer, advocate and fundraiser for biomedical ME/CFS research.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
roberthmcmullen.bsky.social
This study is being discussed on S4ME with Chris Ponting, Jonathan Edwards and others expressing concerns about over interpreting the significance of the reported findings: www.s4me.info/threads/deve...
Reposted by Robert Saunders (aka McMullen)
cgatist.bsky.social
The research used to claim reliability of a ME/CFS blood test has important limitations, shown here.

www.theguardian.com/society/2025...
Three possible confounders in a study proposing an ME/CFS blood test : sex/age, batch and inactivity/severity. Better designed studies by independent researchers are necessary.
roberthmcmullen.bsky.social
George, If you’re minded to write more about this I would recommend reading this excellent analysis by @benbgeiger.bsky.social which reveals how misleading some of the statistics about increases in people claiming out-of-work benefit are:
inequalities.substack.com/p/real-out-o...
Are out-of-work benefit claims at a record high?
The official statistics are wildly misleading - I've now made some new estimates that show just how wrong they are
inequalities.substack.com
Reposted by Robert Saunders (aka McMullen)
mecfsskeptic.bsky.social
1) We’ve written an article about the DecodeME results: what the study measured, what the results show, and why its findings are important.
roberthmcmullen.bsky.social
This is the most recent study that I’m aware of: bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com/articles/10....

It estimates that UK prevalence “may be as high as” 404,000.
Unequal access to diagnosis of myalgic encephalomyelitis in England - BMC Public Health
Background People with Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (ME/CFS; sometimes referred to as chronic fatigue syndrome) experience poor health-related quality of life and only rarely recover. ME/CFS has no curative treatment, and no single diagnostic test. Public health and policy decisions relevant to ME/CFS require knowledge of its prevalence and barriers to diagnosis. However, people with ME/CFS report lengthy diagnostic delays and prevalence estimates vary greatly due to uneven diagnosis and misdiagnosis. Factors that influence diagnosis could be revealed by stratifying a single population by gender, age and ethnicity. Methods Hospital Episode Statistics data, routinely collected by the NHS in England, was downloaded from the Feasibility Self-Service of NHS DigiTrials. This was used to stratify individuals with the ICD-10 code that best reflects ME/CFS symptoms (G93.3) according to age, self-reported gender and ethnicity, General Practice and NHS England Integrated Care Board (ICB). Results In all, 100,055 people in England had been diagnosed with ME/CFS (ICD-10:G93.3) between April 1 1989 and October 7 2023, 0.16% of all registered patients. Of these, 79,445 were females and 20,590 males, a female-to-male ratio of 3.88:1. Female relative to male prevalence peaked at about 6-to-1 in individuals’ fourth and fifth decades of life. Prevalence varied widely across the 42 ICBs: 0.086%-0.82% for females and 0.024%-0.21% for males. White individuals were approximately fivefold more likely to be diagnosed with ME/CFS than others; Black, Asian or Chinese ethnicities are associated with particularly low rates of ME/CFS diagnoses. This ethnicity bias is stronger than for other common diseases. Among active English GP practices, 176 (3%) had no registered ME/CFS patients. Eight ICBs (19%) each contained fewer than 8 other-than-white individuals with a G93.3 code despite their registers containing a total of 293,770 other-than-white patients. Conclusion Other-than-white ethnic groups, older females (> 60y), older males (> 80y), and people living in areas of multiple deprivation are disproportionately undiagnosed with ME/CFS. Lifetime prevalence of ME/CFS for English females and males may be as high as 0.92% and 0.25%, respectively, or approximately 404,000 UK individuals overall (0.6%). This improved estimate of ME/CFS prevalence allows more accurate assessment of the socioeconomic and disease burden imposed by ME/CFS.
bmcpublichealth.biomedcentral.com
roberthmcmullen.bsky.social
As a non lawyer I’m wondering why he would have bothered to set up a trust when it would have been far easier and less expensive to keep ownership of the land himself and let his parents use it for free for their lifetime as a gift. It appears that’s what he did. Seems very sensible and kind to me.
roberthmcmullen.bsky.social
Doesn’t even appear on the main page of the BBC News app, which has had Farage in its headlines for weeks.
roberthmcmullen.bsky.social
Niger seed plant – Guizotia abyssinica.
roberthmcmullen.bsky.social
The government should be leading, not following.
roberthmcmullen.bsky.social
And still the government and numerous progressive journalists and commentators continue to use X, like zombies manipulated by Musk’s algorithm.
roberthmcmullen.bsky.social
The big issue of the day: fewer or less than half of children? www.thetimes.com/comment/colu...

@susiedent.com please can you adjudicate?
Let’s be natural when it comes to fewer versus less
This is contested territory — it certainly seems to rile some of our readers

Rob Nash
Friday September 12 2025, 7.52pm, The Times

Fewer than half of Feedback readers spend less than 20 minutes a day thinking about grammar. Or perhaps I mean: less than half of readers spend fewer than 20 minutes a day thinking about grammar.
The first version is preferable, to my mind. But not to everyone’s.

Our style guide says: “The thing being measured is singular (time, space) even if the units (years, miles) are plural.” Fewer, on the other hand, is used “generally with plural nouns”. Feedback readers are definitely a plural (even in a bad week), so it’s fewer. QED, surely.

QEDon’t, reckoned Robert Saunders of West Sussex, who was “shocked to read that ‘Fewer than half of UK children under 15 help with household chores’. What is the world coming to? It is less than half, not fewer.” Bernard Hughes was likewise “disturbed by the headline. ‘Fewer than half’ is surely an example of hypercorrection. ‘Less than half’ is much more natural and I think would have been universally used till people started worrying about it seeming wrong. ‘Half’ is an amount, not a number. Will you come out against this nonsense?”

This is contested territory, and it seems to me in the case of our headline that there are three questions. First, is less/fewer referring to the size of the fraction or the number of children? The latter, in my view. Second, even if the latter, would it still be preferable to use less? Not to my ear. Third, can one not choose whichever one thinks sounds better? I suppose so. As the Times style guide concludes: “This is an area where prescriptive zeal should not trump common sense and an ear for what sounds natural and right; so that’s one less thing to worry about.”
roberthmcmullen.bsky.social
I mostly stopped listening to Today before I stopped using X.
Reposted by Robert Saunders (aka McMullen)
meassociation.org.uk
ME Research UK and the ME Association are excited to announce funding to Dr Fatima Labeed and Dr Jackie Cliff to develop a diagnostic test for ME/CFS, expanding on their initial study showing electrical differences in blood cells from people with ME/CFS. 

https://meassociation.org.uk/wohx

#MECFS
Research: Second-Phase Funding to Advance the Development of a Diagnostic Test for ME/CFS - The ME Association
The ME Association and ME Research UK are excited to […]
meassociation.org.uk
roberthmcmullen.bsky.social
In 2023 I unsuccessful nominated Tom for an honorary degree at Trinity College Dublin with the support of numerous scientists, organisations and others. (Details here: www.s4me.info/threads/tom-...)

Delighted that Tom has now been honoured by the Belvedere Union. Hugely well-deserved 💪 🥳
roberthmcmullen.bsky.social
Congratulations,Tom! This is great news and well deserved 💪🥳
Reposted by Robert Saunders (aka McMullen)
roberthmcmullen.bsky.social
Prof Chris Ponting, lead author of DecodeME: “It is clear that ME is not a research priority for this UK government ... We have to asked the question of them: Why is ME not a priority when all these other diseases have been and are?“

Why is that @rthonwesstreeting.bsky.social?
roberthmcmullen.bsky.social
The video clip above is taken from the DecodeME webinar on 14 August: www.facebook.com/share/v/16q2...

Chris Ponting was answering a question about what he hopes for next.
Redirecting...
www.facebook.com
roberthmcmullen.bsky.social
Prof Chris Ponting, lead author of DecodeME: “It is clear that ME is not a research priority for this UK government ... We have to asked the question of them: Why is ME not a priority when all these other diseases have been and are?“

Why is that @rthonwesstreeting.bsky.social?
Reposted by Robert Saunders (aka McMullen)
susiedent.com
Sometimes the historical dictionary offers solace through the existence of an obsolete word that is sorely needed now. One of them is ‘respair’, recorded just once, in the 15th century. It means fresh hope, and a recovery from despair.
Reposted by Robert Saunders (aka McMullen)
decodemestudy.bsky.social
"DecodeME is now calling on researchers worldwide to join us in accelerating ME/CFS research.” - Prof Chris Ponting (DecodeME Investigator).

We encourage researchers to explore and build on our findings. Apply for access to our rich dataset now shorturl.at/F8aOM
Image of Chris Ponting next to quote "This is a wakeup call. These extraordinary results speak the language of people with ME/CFS, often recounting people's ME/CFS symptoms. DecodeME is now calling on researchers worldwide to join us in accelerating ME/CFS research"