We're gonna need an Ian Holm-y looking fella.

Cool. What if in this take they pulled a Better Call Saul and recontextualized Ash?

People who live in skyscrapers should get a vote on how they are engineered. /s

Interesting! The timeline alone is wild:

FDR dies April 12th
Truman briefed on the project April 25th
Trinity test July 16th
Hiroshima bombing Aug 6th

Extraordinary!

Got it. It's interesting bc Argonne, UofC and others locally are doing a good job imo of media outreach and education for quantum, but barely seem to be trying for "AI" so far.

Crain's rarely goes deep on anything technology related. I think DOE has decided to fully embrace "AI" = supercomputers, which they are good at managing and using at the national labs. Similar to how "nano" was used to brand materials science 10-20 years ago.

Understood. The pro gives a little more space, but of course is slightly bulkier and heavier. My aging eyes need the real estate for journal articles. I see now they have a Pro move, but it's way too small for me, like kindle size.

I have and like the Pro. The low functionality is its charm IMO, no distractions. Just for reading and taking notes by hand, keyboard pointless for this. I never use iPads, would rather be on desktop or phone. The colors on the Pro are just ok. Its surface better than glass screen for writing.

* this word may be too motivated, "description" could work better in many cases (geology, astronomy)

*This assumes the new Fusion Office starts with the people from the old Fusion Energy Sciences and AIQ combines people from BES and ASCR, but I am speculating.

Remarkable. Fusion and AIQ seem to have been elevated from within the Office of Science; I wonder what its structure is now.