Rupert Stuart-Smith
@rupertstuartsmith.bsky.social
110 followers 84 following 26 posts
Senior Research Associate in climate science and the law, Oxford Sustainable Law Programme, University of Oxford Climate scientist and collaborator of lawyers https://www.smithschool.ox.ac.uk/person/dr-rupert-stuart-smith
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Rupert Stuart-Smith
colincarlson.bsky.social
🚨 NEW: Climate change is already causing 30,000 deaths per year - a global annual economic loss of $100-350B USD - but the true damage is probably 10x higher. Out TODAY in Nature Climate Change: the first systematic look at the science of "health impact attribution" 🔓 www.nature.com/articles/s41...
"Health losses attributed to anthropogenic climate change," a brief communication in the journal Nature Climate Change. There's a map showing regions of the world, and pie charts of relevant studies as they apply to different health impacts like "heat-related deaths" and "maternal and child health"
rupertstuartsmith.bsky.social
The paper was co-authored with @anavicedo9.bsky.social Sihan Li @frediotto.bsky.social Kristine Belesova, Andy Haines @harrinluke.bsky.social Jeremy Hess, Rashmi Venkatraman @thomwetzer.bsky.social Alistair Woodward @krisebi.bsky.social - @smithschool.ox.ac.uk
rupertstuartsmith.bsky.social
Finally, we quantified individual companies' emissions' contributions to heat-related deaths using a simple 'market-share' approach that quantifies attributable deaths in proportion to emissions. The six highest-emitting companies globally caused at least one additional death each summer since 2004.
rupertstuartsmith.bsky.social
A benefit of this approach was that we could use daily observed mortality data to quantify heat-related deaths, rather than mean mortality for the day of the year, allowing us to more precisely quantify how many attributable deaths occured on any given day.
rupertstuartsmith.bsky.social
To quantify heat-mortality during and outside of heatwaves, we modified the approach used elsewhere and calculated counterfactual temperatures by subtracting attributable temperature anomalies from observations, producing a 50-yr time series that matches observed temperature flucturations.
rupertstuartsmith.bsky.social
We then quantified heat-mortality during and outside heatwaves. The hottest temperatures often get the most attention - and heat deaths are indeed highest then - but three-quarters of heat mortality attributable to human influence on the climate in 2018 occurred outside of the 12-day heatwave.
rupertstuartsmith.bsky.social
in KlimaSeniorinnen v Switzerland to justify its finding that Switzerland needed to reduce emissions: "Although the applicants could agree that adaptation was also crucial, it was not an answer to what Switzerland should have done to mitigate climate change." hudoc.echr.coe.int/eng#_ftnref178
rupertstuartsmith.bsky.social
Our finding shows that changes in vulnerability can reduce heat-mortality, but at least in Zurich, it's still not been enough. Only ceasing GHG emissions will stop the burden of climate change-caused deaths from rising further. As a preprint, the European Court of Human Rights cited this result...
rupertstuartsmith.bsky.social
We conducted experiments where we applied the heat-mortality relationship from the 1980s/90s to 2004-2018 as a 'constant vulnerability' baseline and found that >700 deaths had been avoided by declining vulnerability. But attributable heat-related deaths had continued to rise in any case.
rupertstuartsmith.bsky.social
We knew that vulnerability to heat changes with time: e.g. behavioural/infrastructual adaptation to heat would be reducing vulnerability while population ageing has the opposite effect. But what is the overall effect of changing vulnerability? Could it be enough to counteract the effects of warming?
rupertstuartsmith.bsky.social
Out now: our new study shows that climate change caused nearly 1,700 heat-related deaths in Zürich over 50 years.

We assessed the effects of changing vulnerability to heat, heat-mortality within and outside of heatwaves, and the contribution of individual companies' emissions to heat deaths.
rupertstuartsmith.bsky.social
The guidance is designed to be inclusive and method-agnostic, identifying key steps for robust, high quality analyses. We hope that it will prove useful to study authors, reviewers, journal editors and research funders.

Available here: link.springer.com/article/10.1...
link.springer.com
rupertstuartsmith.bsky.social
Out now: new guidance for research that attributes health outcomes to climate change led by @krisebi.bsky.social, Andy Haines @lshtm.bsky.social, myself, supported by a fantastic team of co-authors and @wellcometrust.bsky.social.
Reposted by Rupert Stuart-Smith
rubenpruetz.bsky.social
We need CDR. 🧩

But the ambiguity & lack of transparency regarding #CDR in states‘ climate plans jeopardize the PA. ❌

We unpack this issue by reviewing strategies of 70+ states concerning their CDR plans. 📑

👇 More in the thread by lead author Rupert Stuart-Smith & our study doi.org/10.1080/1469...
rupertstuartsmith.bsky.social
🚨 Out now in @climate-policy.bsky.social: New research with @thomwetzer.bsky.social @rubenpruetz.bsky.social @joerirogelj.bsky.social Lavanya Rajamani, Marianne Wood and Ewan White: States are depending heavily on CO2 removal to meet climate targets, risking the Paris Agreement goal.
Reposted by Rupert Stuart-Smith
joerirogelj.bsky.social
New research on limits to CO2 removal (CDR). CDR is key to our ambition to stop adding climate pollution to the atmosphere. Because it's uncertain how much will be delivered and it clearly comes with risks of social & environmental side-effects, legal issues arise. This paper provides an overview. 👇
rupertstuartsmith.bsky.social
🚨 Out now in @climate-policy.bsky.social: New research with @thomwetzer.bsky.social @rubenpruetz.bsky.social @joerirogelj.bsky.social Lavanya Rajamani, Marianne Wood and Ewan White: States are depending heavily on CO2 removal to meet climate targets, risking the Paris Agreement goal.
rupertstuartsmith.bsky.social
Legal analysis, in conjunction with the risks associated with CDR-dependent targets assessed here, could clarify states’ mitigation obligations under international law and facilitate progression past a risk-blind and indiscriminate use of scientific pathways in assessing states’ targets. More soon!
rupertstuartsmith.bsky.social
To minimise risks associated with reliance on CO2 removal, states should prioritise pathways that minimise overshoot and dependence on removals to reach net-zero. Risks associated with high CDR dependence might render state action inconsistent with norms and principles of international law.
rupertstuartsmith.bsky.social
-- Reliance on international cooperation to deliver CO2 removal (e.g. via carbon trading mechanisms) is also common in states' plans and amplifies these risks.

-- Non-delivery of planned CO2 removal would raise global temperatures further, worsening the impacts of climate change.
rupertstuartsmith.bsky.social
-- There is pervasive lack of transparency and ambiguities in states' international reporting, with respect to how states intend to meet their climate targets.

-- However, dependence on high levels of CO2 removal is widespread and substantial risks to delivery of planned CO2 removal exist.
rupertstuartsmith.bsky.social
-- Inadequate near-term emission reductions are common, jeopardise the Paris climate targets and create substantial long-term dependence on CO2 removal to eliminate a temperature overshoot, with its associated risks.
rupertstuartsmith.bsky.social
🚨 Out now in @climate-policy.bsky.social: New research with @thomwetzer.bsky.social @rubenpruetz.bsky.social @joerirogelj.bsky.social Lavanya Rajamani, Marianne Wood and Ewan White: States are depending heavily on CO2 removal to meet climate targets, risking the Paris Agreement goal.