Ryan Griffiths
@rygriff.bsky.social
270 followers 360 following 1K posts
‘And No One Cheered’ is the best book title ever because it’s about us and power.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
rygriff.bsky.social
‘Vote for me and I’ll do as you say and violate some Charter stuff using a Charter clause,’ is that liberal or democratic?
rygriff.bsky.social
If the Jays make the World Series I’ll listen to a game or two on the radio.
rygriff.bsky.social
It’s odd that he doesn’t already live in a country that approximates the dream of the dark enlightenment more nearly than the US does
rygriff.bsky.social
What’s it called when one’s presentation of one’s writing screams ‘bigots will persecute me for what I mean.’ Like where the point of veiling the views is not to hide them but shame anyone for persecuting them? Like, Hume.
rygriff.bsky.social
Oh, is that the reason? Real ermine? That’s cruel.
rygriff.bsky.social
I can feel what it must feel like for him to make that mistake. One of those ‘who took my phone. You bastards always play games with it.’ ‘It’s in your pocket.’ ‘Ok. But still it’s awful what you do with my phone.’
rygriff.bsky.social
The old ones are better because the new ones are better.
emmettmacfarlane.com
Sorry, traditionalists, but the new robes are sharper.
journodale.bsky.social
New ceremonial robes vs old ceremonial robes. #SCC
rygriff.bsky.social
If Party B enacts policy X only bc Party A enacted policy Y, that’s maybe backlash or reactionary. But if Party B is just for X and Party A is just for Y, then that’s just normal.
rygriff.bsky.social
When the state was new statecraft and principle were clearly distinct.

Now, ‘I’m for freedom of religion,’ ~means ‘the state shouldn’t X.’ We then ask, ‘on what principle?’

In the 18th cent ‘freedom of religion’ was the principle, and it was religious, and implied ~nothing about statecraft.
rygriff.bsky.social
Ohhhh, the thing about nostalgia is…

No, no, I know what you mean.
rygriff.bsky.social
The Bronx is in New York. What’s the ‘borough’ the Jays play in? Distillery District?
rygriff.bsky.social
The worse things get the more important is dusty history of political thought. Normative theory rises, too, but less. Why?

In HPT you often find that big good ideas beget horrors.

In any case, here’s my theory of why we’re good but this one thing is making us bad.
Reposted by Ryan Griffiths
kenwhite.bsky.social
/3 Because, if you didn’t know, prosecutors CAN obtain summonses to tell people to come to court to face charges, and who gets those and who gets arrested is a story of privilege, race, petty vindictiveness, and everything else bad about the system. But I digress.
Reposted by Ryan Griffiths
uncanonical.bsky.social
And I thought America took the Rawls hagiography too far.
rygriff.bsky.social
I love Jimmy Butler. Like, I assume he’s right always.
rygriff.bsky.social
Anyway, my basic thing is if he said ‘I like slavery and killing journalists’ and then have considered reasons why, that’d be uniquely horrible. Praising free speech is among the best things he could have done while doing a bad thing. Ok, bye. Sorry. Have a good one.
rygriff.bsky.social
Yes, but that’s what I mean by saying comedywashing is bad. I think it’s impossible to hear ‘speech is freer in SA than USA’ and not actually hear that as criticism of the USA for not being extremely free. If I say ‘Scrooge is nicer than you’ I’m just saying you’re bad and niceness is good.
rygriff.bsky.social
If I said ‘don’t violate human rights’ and a human rights violator said ‘of course not’ that wouldn’t mean I didn’t criticize him. How can you on one hand think a) SA does not have free speech and on the other think b) praising free speech does not imply criticism?
rygriff.bsky.social
Why be fussy about this? Criticize them for comedywashing SA. Yes. But. To praise free speech implies criticism of places that do t grant it. That is basic human thinking. I’m not reading into anything. Just simple. If you said ‘oil is bad,’ implies criticism of SA. Dead simple.
Reposted by Ryan Griffiths
lyresdictionary.com
iatroplasty (n)
the forming of doctors
rygriff.bsky.social
Oh, oh what a feeling
When you hit New Yorker’s
Ceiling.
rygriff.bsky.social
Cool book on biography of the reasonable person, but it downplays the legal concepts role in moral phil of the era, incorrectly i believe www.cambridge.org/core/books/r...
The Reasonable Person
Cambridge Core - Socio-Legal Studies - The Reasonable Person
www.cambridge.org
rygriff.bsky.social
Hume uses ‘impartial spectator’ in History of England, I think in the editions that came out in 1757 and Smith published Moral Sentiments in 1759. That said, a bunch of others had used ‘impartial spectator’ deriving from common law ‘reasonable person’
rygriff.bsky.social
Yeah. And sorry, I just meant my Hume econ stuff as helping. Many who know Hume extremely well don’t know much about his econ. Was just trying to save you time in case, like many Phils I respect, you didn’t quite know that. It is neat to find the overlaps, was trying to be like ‘you’re right’