'If AI is going to shape our digital future, then women’s safety, dignity and participation cannot be treated as optional extras. The question isn’t whether the technology can do this. It’s whether we’re willing to insist that it shouldn’t.'

'It’s the logical outcome of years of warnings being ignored. Warnings from women’s organisations who have been saying, clearly and consistently, that new technologies would be used to reproduce old harms unless governments and platforms acted decisively.'
cc @ukhomeoffice

'This isn’t a sudden failure of one rogue AI system. On Grok's launch, xAI positioned it as a more ‘unfiltered’, 'rebellious,' and boundary-pushing AI, explicitly designed to answer ‘spicy’ questions that other models would reject. '

'What’s striking, though, is how predictable this all feels.

Grok doesn’t represent a new category of harm. It simply exposes, in real time, the gaps women’s organisations have been flagging for years.'

This one, too, please
actionnetwork.org/petitions/ca...

Ha, they are just in the thrall of Musk (who hates them anyway) and his billions.

'We always hope.' Jesus christ!

We're in hell.

Horrendous. They haven't said a word. Considering all the fanfare they made about their violence against women and girls' strategy last month, they are a disgrace too.

2.37am

www.readtpa.com/p/grok-cant-...

🫶🏿