Sarcasmo
@sarcasmodemiami.bsky.social
Want: An ever more inclusive, equal & democratic world.
Married dad growing orchids, tropical fruit, palms & cycads. Pets include 🐕🐈🐢🦎🐓 & 🐠. J.D., B.A. in econ & hist. Luv meteorology. 🇹🇼🇮🇱🇺🇦 & a 2 state solution. ⚽️ ^Das my fish^
Married dad growing orchids, tropical fruit, palms & cycads. Pets include 🐕🐈🐢🦎🐓 & 🐠. J.D., B.A. in econ & hist. Luv meteorology. 🇹🇼🇮🇱🇺🇦 & a 2 state solution. ⚽️ ^Das my fish^
Are we talking a 2015 Pokémon Art Academy Competition Card?
Is the intent of shitting on the table to distract while executing an unexpected, killer move?
Really... I'm gonna need more.
Really
Is the intent of shitting on the table to distract while executing an unexpected, killer move?
Really... I'm gonna need more.
Really
November 10, 2025 at 7:01 PM
Are we talking a 2015 Pokémon Art Academy Competition Card?
Is the intent of shitting on the table to distract while executing an unexpected, killer move?
Really... I'm gonna need more.
Really
Is the intent of shitting on the table to distract while executing an unexpected, killer move?
Really... I'm gonna need more.
Really
One (1) internet point awarded if you can give the coordinates where this picture was taken.
November 10, 2025 at 6:51 PM
One (1) internet point awarded if you can give the coordinates where this picture was taken.
then why time limit?
November 10, 2025 at 5:58 PM
then why time limit?
‘They caved for 90 days in order to try and get further concessions and, if they don’t, are right back ready to shutdown the government, again,’ is not much of a cave when i say it out loud.
November 10, 2025 at 5:55 PM
‘They caved for 90 days in order to try and get further concessions and, if they don’t, are right back ready to shutdown the government, again,’ is not much of a cave when i say it out loud.
Is your assertion that ‘a politician who will accept money from AIPAC is willing to act in service of AIPAC over their constituents’?
November 10, 2025 at 5:49 PM
Is your assertion that ‘a politician who will accept money from AIPAC is willing to act in service of AIPAC over their constituents’?
I doubt her condescension is intended to be for your benefit or rests on whether you give give a shit. It’s simply how someone speaks to another who is hopelessly confused by the reality of politics and spouting shit.
November 10, 2025 at 7:55 AM
I doubt her condescension is intended to be for your benefit or rests on whether you give give a shit. It’s simply how someone speaks to another who is hopelessly confused by the reality of politics and spouting shit.
my understanding is that Johnson has to bring the House back to vote on the legislation b/c the Senate bill differs from the House CR.
November 10, 2025 at 2:49 AM
my understanding is that Johnson has to bring the House back to vote on the legislation b/c the Senate bill differs from the House CR.
I don’t know what i think of the deal, but I’m pretty confident that in 2-3 days people will be mire focused on this instead:
November 10, 2025 at 1:04 AM
I don’t know what i think of the deal, but I’m pretty confident that in 2-3 days people will be mire focused on this instead:
example of something that i just discovered which could change the calculus. (in this case, for the better). unfortunately, only time will tell.
bsky.app/profile/conv...
bsky.app/profile/conv...
This is actually a huge get
(and which also might sink the deal in House anyway)
(and which also might sink the deal in House anyway)
The RIFs language is actually great. Not only does it rehire the people RIFed during the shutdown, it makes it an unequivocal Antideficiency Act violation to do ANY MORE RIFs through the duration of the CR (Jan 30)
Completely stops Trump/Vought Phase 2 for now
Would love to see this standardized
Completely stops Trump/Vought Phase 2 for now
Would love to see this standardized
November 10, 2025 at 12:48 AM
example of something that i just discovered which could change the calculus. (in this case, for the better). unfortunately, only time will tell.
bsky.app/profile/conv...
bsky.app/profile/conv...
In January, a lot of people will be fully and completely enraged & financially broken by the end of ACA subsidies.
November 9, 2025 at 10:40 PM
In January, a lot of people will be fully and completely enraged & financially broken by the end of ACA subsidies.
For 3 days. Then the reality of ACA cuts will be front and center and people will be mad at Republicans.
November 9, 2025 at 10:32 PM
For 3 days. Then the reality of ACA cuts will be front and center and people will be mad at Republicans.
Are you saying this could *conceivably* fail in the House and end up forcing the release of the Epstein files?
November 9, 2025 at 10:26 PM
Are you saying this could *conceivably* fail in the House and end up forcing the release of the Epstein files?
Until recent elections, that had some appeal. Now I think Republicans are toast & Dems will crush them electorally so Re-opening doesn’t feel like abandoning democracy. People will suffer horribly from ACA costs, but I don’t think anything can stop Republicans from that self-immolation
November 9, 2025 at 10:21 PM
Until recent elections, that had some appeal. Now I think Republicans are toast & Dems will crush them electorally so Re-opening doesn’t feel like abandoning democracy. People will suffer horribly from ACA costs, but I don’t think anything can stop Republicans from that self-immolation
Reposted by Sarcasmo
I’m not sure about the specifics and those will matter to me. BUT I’m also pretty confident after reading dozens of posts on the putative deal that 99% of the anger is based on assumptions & presumptions with zero grounding in reality. it could suck! or not! but that’s irrelevant to the reaction.
November 9, 2025 at 10:15 PM
I’m not sure about the specifics and those will matter to me. BUT I’m also pretty confident after reading dozens of posts on the putative deal that 99% of the anger is based on assumptions & presumptions with zero grounding in reality. it could suck! or not! but that’s irrelevant to the reaction.
I’m not sure about the specifics and those will matter to me. BUT I’m also pretty confident after reading dozens of posts on the putative deal that 99% of the anger is based on assumptions & presumptions with zero grounding in reality. it could suck! or not! but that’s irrelevant to the reaction.
November 9, 2025 at 10:15 PM
I’m not sure about the specifics and those will matter to me. BUT I’m also pretty confident after reading dozens of posts on the putative deal that 99% of the anger is based on assumptions & presumptions with zero grounding in reality. it could suck! or not! but that’s irrelevant to the reaction.
Welching on a deal is my jam.
November 9, 2025 at 10:10 PM
Welching on a deal is my jam.
Because laws matter whether their subject is something you deem important or not?
November 9, 2025 at 9:50 PM
Because laws matter whether their subject is something you deem important or not?
The first thing the league should do is bar them & everyone associated with the betting from ever having anything to do with baseball again. Bar them and their families from setting foot in a stadium again.
November 9, 2025 at 9:48 PM
The first thing the league should do is bar them & everyone associated with the betting from ever having anything to do with baseball again. Bar them and their families from setting foot in a stadium again.
I know you’re being sarcastic, but even *shittiest* capitalism is predicated on ‘laws matter.’ In a world where laws don’t matter, private ownership of property (the sine qua non of capitalism) loses meaning.
November 9, 2025 at 9:45 PM
I know you’re being sarcastic, but even *shittiest* capitalism is predicated on ‘laws matter.’ In a world where laws don’t matter, private ownership of property (the sine qua non of capitalism) loses meaning.
My neighbor is currently a national political reporter for Axios.
I try not to speak to my neighbor.
I try not to speak to my neighbor.
November 9, 2025 at 7:09 PM
My neighbor is currently a national political reporter for Axios.
I try not to speak to my neighbor.
I try not to speak to my neighbor.
I suggest this is the only viable argument for gambling, generally.
It provides a thrill… People need to learn, be reminded & taught that indulging that thrill will always yield a net negative to society.
It provides a thrill… People need to learn, be reminded & taught that indulging that thrill will always yield a net negative to society.
November 9, 2025 at 7:04 PM
I suggest this is the only viable argument for gambling, generally.
It provides a thrill… People need to learn, be reminded & taught that indulging that thrill will always yield a net negative to society.
It provides a thrill… People need to learn, be reminded & taught that indulging that thrill will always yield a net negative to society.