Jeremy Schmit
schmitbiophysics.bsky.social
Jeremy Schmit
@schmitbiophysics.bsky.social
Statistical mechanics & biophysics theorist. Emergent properties in biomolecules. Systems biology curious. Father, former athlete. Kansas State University Physics. Occasional appearance of Legos.
Congratulations, Ivar!
February 4, 2026 at 8:08 PM
There is a tradeoff between mobility and affinity. Increasing length reduces binding cooperativity (for fixed valence) which initially aids mobility until entanglement kicks in.
February 3, 2026 at 8:58 PM
I agree with your speculation of a publication bias. When developing our paper, I spoke to several groups sitting on unpublished negative results. We even changed the pitch of our paper to emphasize the (limited) regimes of acceleration, when the real message is about retardation.
February 3, 2026 at 8:34 PM
Put simply: high concentrations facilitate reactions because you get more molecular collisions. However, molecules don't move well (or collide) when they are stuck together:
journals.aps.org/pre/abstract...
Physical limits to acceleration of enzymatic reactions inside phase-separated compartments
We present a theoretical analysis of phase-separated compartments to facilitate enzymatic chemical reactions. While phase separation can facilitate reactions by increasing local concentration, it can ...
journals.aps.org
February 3, 2026 at 8:27 PM
Not sure I have advice to give, but I will offer congratulations on the life/career achievement!
December 12, 2025 at 7:39 PM
I don't know if I'm more relieved to hear that my cultural references aren't as old as I feared, or more concerned that the same bad idea emerged from independent sources.
December 12, 2025 at 7:32 PM
It seems your coach was unable to tell the difference between a cartoon and an instructional video on coaching pedagogy
December 12, 2025 at 5:23 PM
This was a running joke in a South Park episode. But, if there is one thing we have learned since it aired, there is a significant part of the population that is incapable of telling the difference between satire and reality.
December 12, 2025 at 4:38 PM
A lot of complexity comes from thinking in terms of two-phase dilute/dense equilibrium. A three-state monomer/oligomer/dense framework is much easier. The monomer/oligomer and monomer/dense equilibria are easy to understand (and calculate) and the oligomer/dense comes along for free. 7/7
December 1, 2025 at 9:14 PM
We show how to subtract oligomer effects from experimental data in order to reveal the solubility product phase boundary. The deviations from power law can then be used to understand the dense phase energy landscape. 6/7
December 1, 2025 at 9:14 PM
Second, unlike salts, biomolecular condensates do not have strict stoichiometries. Variable stoichiometry in the dense phase bends the power law phase boundary, resulting in a larger two-phase region. 5/7
December 1, 2025 at 9:13 PM
First, the solubility product describes the relationship between the dense phase and free monomers. But the dilute phase concentration measured by experiments usually includes oligomers. Oligomers cause "re-entrant" and "magic number" effects, both of which shrink the two-phase region. 4/7
December 1, 2025 at 9:13 PM
Biomolecular phase diagrams rarely show power law boundaries. We show that the solubility product power law still works, but it is hidden by two opposing effects. 3/7
December 1, 2025 at 9:13 PM
Multi-component condensation has a lot in common with salts, which have simple power-law phase boundaries. The exponent in the power law comes from the salt’s dissociation constant, the so-called “solubility product”. 2/7
December 1, 2025 at 9:09 PM