Marc Schulz
@schulzmarc.bsky.social
Ending section 230 will do nothing to stop tech companies from doing this. It will end free speech and exchange of ideas and hand the trump administration yet more tools to destroy competing ideas
December 19, 2025 at 9:30 AM
Ending section 230 will do nothing to stop tech companies from doing this. It will end free speech and exchange of ideas and hand the trump administration yet more tools to destroy competing ideas
Devaluing your IP for short term revenue seems pretty on brand for the last 45 years of business management.
December 11, 2025 at 4:31 PM
Devaluing your IP for short term revenue seems pretty on brand for the last 45 years of business management.
You are correct on this and honestly I can’t think of any firewall where if you hit the deny rule it continues evaluating.
December 6, 2025 at 1:30 AM
You are correct on this and honestly I can’t think of any firewall where if you hit the deny rule it continues evaluating.
They could have just let the lower court rulings stand. The fact that they've taken it up likely means they plan on overturning the lower courts and creating an entire class of people that the president can seemingly define as he sees fit to not be worthy of citizenship.
This is terrible.
This is terrible.
December 5, 2025 at 7:49 PM
They could have just let the lower court rulings stand. The fact that they've taken it up likely means they plan on overturning the lower courts and creating an entire class of people that the president can seemingly define as he sees fit to not be worthy of citizenship.
This is terrible.
This is terrible.
Hacked computer at home, permanent internet loss. Maybe SCOTUS will set an impossibly high bar for these lawsuits or if they side with sony severely damage the internet as we know it. 2/2
December 2, 2025 at 5:41 PM
Hacked computer at home, permanent internet loss. Maybe SCOTUS will set an impossibly high bar for these lawsuits or if they side with sony severely damage the internet as we know it. 2/2
Cox's argument is probably correct but didn't really go far enough. It would crush public and semi-public internet access and kill any home user who isn't a cybersecurity wiz. It also kills xfinity's public mesh project because that puts subscribers at risk of being disconnected. 1/2
December 2, 2025 at 5:41 PM
Cox's argument is probably correct but didn't really go far enough. It would crush public and semi-public internet access and kill any home user who isn't a cybersecurity wiz. It also kills xfinity's public mesh project because that puts subscribers at risk of being disconnected. 1/2
From an ethical standpoint no there doesn't. You inheritly treat your partner differently than you might a stranger or even a good friend. This creates both conscious and unconscious biases. It's not being prudish it's just being realistic. It's why romantic relationships at jobs are frowned upon.
December 2, 2025 at 5:17 PM
From an ethical standpoint no there doesn't. You inheritly treat your partner differently than you might a stranger or even a good friend. This creates both conscious and unconscious biases. It's not being prudish it's just being realistic. It's why romantic relationships at jobs are frowned upon.
I think we might just be arguing two different standards. You are arguing that there needs to be concrete evidence. I'm arguing that the perception based on their deceptiness around their relationship is enough.
December 2, 2025 at 4:31 PM
I think we might just be arguing two different standards. You are arguing that there needs to be concrete evidence. I'm arguing that the perception based on their deceptiness around their relationship is enough.
The relationship was improper and could have impacted the case in any number of ways.
I'm not defending a double standard. I think this should have applied to thomas and anyone else in similar situations.
I'm not defending a double standard. I think this should have applied to thomas and anyone else in similar situations.
December 2, 2025 at 3:41 PM
The relationship was improper and could have impacted the case in any number of ways.
I'm not defending a double standard. I think this should have applied to thomas and anyone else in similar situations.
I'm not defending a double standard. I think this should have applied to thomas and anyone else in similar situations.
Correct. Appearance of impropriety is "whatever the ones judging it want it to mean." For example if I was dating my boss and got a promotion my coworkers would likely think it improper regardless of the facts. It's their perception. Willis in this case has a perception issue that created doubt.
December 2, 2025 at 12:35 AM
Correct. Appearance of impropriety is "whatever the ones judging it want it to mean." For example if I was dating my boss and got a promotion my coworkers would likely think it improper regardless of the facts. It's their perception. Willis in this case has a perception issue that created doubt.
This conversation is going nowhere because at the end of the day you think that there needs to be a proven conflict of interest and I think there only need be a reasonable appearance of impropriety.
December 1, 2025 at 11:07 PM
This conversation is going nowhere because at the end of the day you think that there needs to be a proven conflict of interest and I think there only need be a reasonable appearance of impropriety.
The rest is just an anti-woke screed also not backed up with anything.
There are ways to write this that are personal and religiously based but this paper is 100% deserving of a zero as it doesn't engage with the material in anything other than passing.
Really disappointed in you professor
3/3
There are ways to write this that are personal and religiously based but this paper is 100% deserving of a zero as it doesn't engage with the material in anything other than passing.
Really disappointed in you professor
3/3
December 1, 2025 at 6:51 PM
The rest is just an anti-woke screed also not backed up with anything.
There are ways to write this that are personal and religiously based but this paper is 100% deserving of a zero as it doesn't engage with the material in anything other than passing.
Really disappointed in you professor
3/3
There are ways to write this that are personal and religiously based but this paper is 100% deserving of a zero as it doesn't engage with the material in anything other than passing.
Really disappointed in you professor
3/3
4) God really just made woman a helper
5) There is no pressure for women to be feminine and men to be masculine (cites no evidence)
6) Makes a claim disputing the is idea that permitting gender nonconforming doesn't provide positive outcomes.
7) Calls her professor a demon.
2/3
5) There is no pressure for women to be feminine and men to be masculine (cites no evidence)
6) Makes a claim disputing the is idea that permitting gender nonconforming doesn't provide positive outcomes.
7) Calls her professor a demon.
2/3
December 1, 2025 at 6:51 PM
4) God really just made woman a helper
5) There is no pressure for women to be feminine and men to be masculine (cites no evidence)
6) Makes a claim disputing the is idea that permitting gender nonconforming doesn't provide positive outcomes.
7) Calls her professor a demon.
2/3
5) There is no pressure for women to be feminine and men to be masculine (cites no evidence)
6) Makes a claim disputing the is idea that permitting gender nonconforming doesn't provide positive outcomes.
7) Calls her professor a demon.
2/3
"Society pushing the lie that there are multiple genders "
Multiple simply means more than one. (M/F)
But her response is essentially
1) I don't believe bullying to be a problem
2) My fellow students are sheep
3) Makes an unsupported assertion that the author claims sterotypes are bad
1/3
Multiple simply means more than one. (M/F)
But her response is essentially
1) I don't believe bullying to be a problem
2) My fellow students are sheep
3) Makes an unsupported assertion that the author claims sterotypes are bad
1/3
December 1, 2025 at 6:51 PM
"Society pushing the lie that there are multiple genders "
Multiple simply means more than one. (M/F)
But her response is essentially
1) I don't believe bullying to be a problem
2) My fellow students are sheep
3) Makes an unsupported assertion that the author claims sterotypes are bad
1/3
Multiple simply means more than one. (M/F)
But her response is essentially
1) I don't believe bullying to be a problem
2) My fellow students are sheep
3) Makes an unsupported assertion that the author claims sterotypes are bad
1/3
He chose not to and the mechanism for removing him chose not to act. Unless the arguement is that what he did was fine I don't see the comparisson.
They argued conflict of interest but that's not why she was removed. She was removed because of the appearance of impropiety broke public trust.
They argued conflict of interest but that's not why she was removed. She was removed because of the appearance of impropiety broke public trust.
December 1, 2025 at 5:32 PM
He chose not to and the mechanism for removing him chose not to act. Unless the arguement is that what he did was fine I don't see the comparisson.
They argued conflict of interest but that's not why she was removed. She was removed because of the appearance of impropiety broke public trust.
They argued conflict of interest but that's not why she was removed. She was removed because of the appearance of impropiety broke public trust.
If you have something you want me to test out for replication just let me know. Happy to help.
November 27, 2025 at 3:34 AM
If you have something you want me to test out for replication just let me know. Happy to help.
Works for me! Safari 18.6 no extensions.
November 27, 2025 at 3:20 AM
Works for me! Safari 18.6 no extensions.
There are ethical concerns around married couples but that's typically handled through organizational controls. If their relationship had been public maybe you don't get the appearance of impropriety. Their interviews and testimony and inconsistencies therin did them in.
Thomas should have recused
Thomas should have recused
November 26, 2025 at 7:11 PM
There are ethical concerns around married couples but that's typically handled through organizational controls. If their relationship had been public maybe you don't get the appearance of impropriety. Their interviews and testimony and inconsistencies therin did them in.
Thomas should have recused
Thomas should have recused
Their relationship is the conflict of interest. Decisions and results in the case whether knowing or unknowingly were influenced by their desire to pursue the relationship (which was a secret). This is why she was simply removed and the case sent back for a new DA assignment and not dismissed.
November 26, 2025 at 6:46 PM
Their relationship is the conflict of interest. Decisions and results in the case whether knowing or unknowingly were influenced by their desire to pursue the relationship (which was a secret). This is why she was simply removed and the case sent back for a new DA assignment and not dismissed.
Pretty much every workplace ethics training for her entire lifetime has warned against office romances and the potential for appearances of impropriety. Which is what she was removed on.
November 26, 2025 at 5:42 PM
Pretty much every workplace ethics training for her entire lifetime has warned against office romances and the potential for appearances of impropriety. Which is what she was removed on.