Sean Morales-Doyle
@seanmorales-doyle.bsky.social
6.1K followers 110 following 23 posts
Director, Voting Rights Program, Brennan Center for Justice
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Sean Morales-Doyle
brennancenter.org
The appellate court said voters cannot sue to challenge discriminatory maps under the Voting Rights Act. The brief explains that's wrong, showing that courts, Congress, the Dep't of Justice, private attorneys, and others have long understood that Section 2 allows voters to do just that. 2/2
Reposted by Sean Morales-Doyle
brennancenter.org
Today, a group of historians, including Brennan Center Historians Council member @alexkeyssar.bsky.social, filed a brief urging SCOTUS to hear Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians v. Howe. 1/2 bit.ly/4gUM8mK
Reposted by Sean Morales-Doyle
brennancenter.org
“In 2025 and 2026, it’s important for people to make a plan for how to vote, and to do it the way you are most comfortable.” — @seanmorales-doyle.bsky.social on The Briefing with Michael Waldman. Watch the full episode on the White House’s effort to seize control of elections: bit.ly/3Illt5U
Reposted by Sean Morales-Doyle
lmillerkaralunas.bsky.social
A reminder that election certification law is already very clear: it's a mandatory legal duty, and county officials in Arizona (and across the country) have no discretion to refuse to certify final election results.
jenafifield.bsky.social
In Arizona, Cochise County supervisors plan to try to test the boundaries of state election laws, saying they want to ditch machines and hand-count ballots, and believe they supervisors should have a choice on whether to certify results. Full story: www.votebeat.org/arizona/2025...
Arizona county known for election turmoil is ready to stir things up again before 2026
New Cochise County supervisors say they want more clarity on the laws — even if it means inviting a court battle with the state.
www.votebeat.org
seanmorales-doyle.bsky.social
It is also yet another sign that Trump's administration is following the Project 2025 playbook, despite Trump's attempts to distance himself from it. That would be bad for our elections, at a time when the administration is already engaged in a concerted effort to undermine them.
The Trump Administration’s Campaign to Undermine the Next Election
The executive branch is interfering in U.S. elections in unprecedented ways.
www.brennancenter.org
seanmorales-doyle.bsky.social
Taken together, it seems these investigations may seek retribution against political adversaries, which Trump and his allies have threatened repeatedly. That would be a serious abuse of power & a plainly inappropriate use of a law designed to protect rights of newly freed Black folks in the 1800s.
seanmorales-doyle.bsky.social
The details of the investigation are not yet public, but at around the same time the subpoenas were issued to James's office, AG Pam Bondi called on election denier Ed Martin to launch a separate investigation into James personally. He is also reportedly investigating Sen. Adam Schiff.
seanmorales-doyle.bsky.social
As my colleague @lmillerkaralunas.bsky.social and I explained, Project 2025 proposed using that law to prosecute election officials that helped voters cast ballots 2020. This is obviously a little different because James is not an election official. But she is a top political rival of Trump's.
What’s Next for Elections Under the Project 2025 Agenda
The administration is using executive actions and public threats to chill future efforts to safeguard elections.
www.brennancenter.org
seanmorales-doyle.bsky.social
The NDNY US Attorney has reportedly issued 2 subpoenas to NY AG Letitia James's office under a 150-yr-old civil rights law in an investigation into whether the office violated Trump's civil rights or the NRA's in successful lawsuits vs each of them. Seems like a page straight out of Project 2025...
Justice Dept. Abruptly Escalates Pressure Campaign on a Trump Adversary
www.nytimes.com
Reposted by Sean Morales-Doyle
brennancenter.org
Our new report connects the dots showing that the Trump administration has launched a campaign to undermine American elections. bit.ly/46ETsQp
Trump’s Anti-Voter Agenda Crystallizes
The administration is now the primary threat to election integrity.
www.brennancenter.org
Reposted by Sean Morales-Doyle
statesunited.org
MUST READ >> A new report from @brennancenter.org lays out a coordinated strategy being enacted by the Trump Administration to undermine free, fair, and secure elections using the federal government itself.

Learn more: www.brennancenter.org/our-work/res...
The Trump Administration’s Campaign to Undermine the Next Election
The executive branch is interfering in U.S. elections in unprecedented ways.
www.brennancenter.org
Reposted by Sean Morales-Doyle
Reposted by Sean Morales-Doyle
brennancenter.org
In 1961, Black and white Freedom Riders traveled together on public transportation in defiance of the South’s segregation laws. Read an illuminating new interview with one of these brave activists: bit.ly/4fsYe5S
Freedom Rider Talks Voting Rights and Being Jailed for Testing Segregation Laws in 1961
The Voting Rights Act, a crowning achievement of the civil rights movement, turns 60 this week. It’s not in good shape.
www.brennancenter.org
seanmorales-doyle.bsky.social
60 years ago today, LBJ signed the Voting Rights Act. It has since been gutted by SCOTUS & is on the brink of further destruction. Where do we go from here? Come hear me discuss with historian @alexkeyssar.bsky.social, congresswoman @repnikema.bsky.social & an attorney @nativerights.bsky.social
The Past, Present, and Future of the Voting Rights Act
Experts discuss what remains of the landmark 1965 law after decades of attacks.
www.brennancenter.org
seanmorales-doyle.bsky.social
The case in question was brought by @nativerights.bsky.social & @campaignlegal.org, who proved in the trial court that ND's redistricting map discriminated against Native voters.
seanmorales-doyle.bsky.social
To underscore how wild the theory it is, the 8th Circuit ruling is based on the idea that Congress didn’t really intend to protect any rights when it passed the Voting RIGHTS Act. 🤯
seanmorales-doyle.bsky.social
The stay from SCOTUS means they might take the case up (hopefully to reverse the 8th 🤞). Gorsuch, Alito, and Thomas said they would have denied the stay. No big surprise since Gorsuch and Thomas basically invited this fringe theory in their concurrence in a case called Brnovich v DNC.
The Voting Rights Act Persists, but So Do Its Adversaries
One of the law’s few remaining safeguards is under attack by rogue states, lower federal courts, and a plurality of the Supreme Court.
www.brennancenter.org
seanmorales-doyle.bsky.social
The 8th Circuit had embraced a radical theory that essentially meant voters couldn't sue under the VRA to challenge race discrimination in voting. Historically, Section 2 cases have mostly been brought by private plaintiffs, and DOJ enforcement seems particularly unlikely during the current admin.
The Importance of Letting Voters Defend Their Rights in Court
Courts have recognized a "private right of action" in the Voting Rights Act since the law’s inception.
www.brennancenter.org
seanmorales-doyle.bsky.social
Today, SCOTUS put a hold on the 8th Circuit's terrible decision in the Turtle Mountain case, which held that private plaintiffs can't sue under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act. This is good news. It revives the VRA at least temporarily while SCOTUS considers whether to take the case.
Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians v. Howe
The full Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals declined to rehear a case that ended the ability of voters in seven states to protect themselves from racially discriminatory voting practices by suing under S...
www.brennancenter.org
Reposted by Sean Morales-Doyle
lizagoitein.bsky.social
A federal judge has issued a temporary restraining order (TRO) requiring Trump to return control of the National Guard to CA Governor Newsom. The order is accompanied by a powerful opinion that affirms the rule of law, separation of powers, and the First Amendment. 1/23
Reposted by Sean Morales-Doyle
tomtmwolf.bsky.social
Historians Martha Jones and Kate Masur have filed a critical new brief in the birthright citizenship cases, showing how the story of free Black Americans' advocacy for birthright citizenship unravels the admin's lead justification for its EO.

Read it ⬇️ www.brennancenter.org/media/13981/...
shared.outlook.inky.com
Reposted by Sean Morales-Doyle
jamalgreene.bsky.social
They wrote the books (literally) on the push for recognition of black citizenship.
tomtmwolf.bsky.social
Historians Martha Jones and Kate Masur have filed a critical new brief in the birthright citizenship cases, showing how the story of free Black Americans' advocacy for birthright citizenship unravels the admin's lead justification for its EO.

Read it ⬇️ www.brennancenter.org/media/13981/...
shared.outlook.inky.com
Reposted by Sean Morales-Doyle
tomtmwolf.bsky.social
After you read--or better, BEFORE you read--RSVP for this June 12 online event with Martha, Kate, and Erika Lee, where they'll unpack the historical dimensions of the lawsuits surrounding birthright citizenship: brennan.swoogo.com/birthrightci...
The Guarantee of Birthright Citizenship
Experts respond to the executive branch’s attack on a foundational right.
brennan.swoogo.com