banner
sgtwrc.bsky.social
@sgtwrc.bsky.social
It's amazing how often on BlueSky a polite fact check, with a mainstream source to back it up, results in an immediate block. Blocking objective facts is sad.
He doesn't call him a hero on X either.
December 18, 2025 at 10:50 AM
He has never called Rittenhouse a hero. He's repeatedly said he isn't a hero. You're seeing things that aren't there. bsky.app/search?q=fro...
December 18, 2025 at 10:46 AM
Google image search says it's you Ron.
December 16, 2025 at 3:42 AM
Sorry to break it to you, but everyone you disagree with isn't a bot.
December 15, 2025 at 1:20 AM
The Rittenhouse video is bizarre in the extreme. His description of events bears no resemblance to the description of events in the affidavit for the arrest warrant. It looks like a pretty clear-cut case of murder.
December 13, 2025 at 11:24 AM
This is 71-year-old Robert Cobb. He tried to stop rioters from burning down his friend's mattress business and the Danish Hall. He wasn't armed. A rioter broke his jaw & knocked him unconscious. This was on the 24th, night 2 of the riots, before any of the people with long guns showed up on night 3.
December 13, 2025 at 11:19 AM
Dictionaries exist.
December 12, 2025 at 8:01 PM
He did. There were many bunnies to chase. He almost ripped my shoulder out its socket going after one. He's a very good boy.
December 12, 2025 at 10:14 AM
Rather than gun homicides, I prefer to just look at intentional homicides (the victim doesn't care what weapon was used). The US is still very high & I'm sure guns make it worse, but it does make the data look more interesting.

Data Source: genderdata.worldbank.org/en/indicator...
December 12, 2025 at 5:11 AM
One of the people at the gas station where he was pushing the burning dumpster was dressed in a similar way to Rittenhouse. I think the most likely reason for the attack was Rosenbaum mistook him for the guy from the earlier confrontation. But this is just an educated guess.
December 12, 2025 at 12:55 AM
In the case of Rosenbaum, we can only speculate. Rosenbaum was clearly angry at those who tried to interfere with lighting fires, committing vandalism & making threats. Earlier in the evening he'd confronted men with long guns, upset that his dumpster fire had been extinguished.
December 12, 2025 at 12:53 AM
The "flimsy 'self-defense' argument" was testimony from multiple witnesses that Rosenbaum threatened to kill him if he found him alone, found him alone, chased him while his buddy Ziminski fired a gun, cornered him, & grabbed for his gun (to presumably carry out the earlier death threat).
December 12, 2025 at 12:45 AM
Joseph Rosenbaum was no protestor. He was a suicidal career criminal who wandered into a riot when his girlfriend wouldn't let him stay at her place (due to a court order) after he'd been released from a mental hospital in Milwaukee. According to all the witnesses he was an agent of chaos all night.
December 12, 2025 at 12:42 AM
This was known to be false a year before his trial & confirmed to be false by the trial. "Mother drove" was always a myth. A myth that started on social media & was then repeated by mainstream media without any attempt at verification of the claim.
December 11, 2025 at 7:25 PM
This was known to be false a year before the trial & confirmed false by the trial. "Mother drove" was always a myth. A myth that started on social media & was then repeated by mainstream media without any attempt at verification of the claim.
December 11, 2025 at 7:24 PM
If you watched both cases (I did too), and you understand the law, then you should realize that Rittenhouse was clearly not guilty and that OJ clearly was guilty.

An OJ juror even admitted it was jury nullification for Rodney King.
December 11, 2025 at 7:21 PM
Here's the Wisconsin statute with a flow chart/decision tree explaining it.
December 11, 2025 at 8:23 AM
It is legal for 16-17-year-olds to open carry long guns in Wisconsin. I think it's a stupid law, but it is nonetheless the law in your state. It is one of the many myths of the case that it was illegal. PBS did an explainer on it. www.pbs.org/newshour/nat...
December 11, 2025 at 8:21 AM
There is no age limit for being there, or for defending yourself. The court ruled his possession of that particular gun (a long gun) to be legal. Every witness who testified about it, including one of the people he shot, said he avoided confrontation all night.
December 11, 2025 at 2:57 AM
It was his uncontested testimony at the trial. The prosecutor even knew how many hours he'd worked that day & when he got off work.
December 11, 2025 at 2:34 AM
Why would she?
December 11, 2025 at 12:54 AM
Klepper interviewed Seth Todd, the "Antifa Toad." Didn't bother to mention that Todd describes himself on social media as Antifa & repeatedly calls for violence against LE & government officials. Just a whimsical guy in a costume. /3
December 9, 2025 at 6:52 PM
The clock icon next to the suggested search suggestions means it's coming directly from your search history.

When I try the search, spotting it the entire query up to the first two letters of "RI" it gives me "Kyle Richards" (whoever that is).
December 2, 2025 at 9:39 AM
@mabinogi62.bsky.social, yet another BlueSky member who doesn't understand how block works here. A simple factual statement results in her blocking, but not before @mabinogi62.bsky.social responds with a post no one will ever see, because she blocked who she's sending it to. 🤦‍♂️
November 29, 2025 at 7:00 PM
Correct, Rittenhouse wasn't protesting or counter protesting. His stated reason for being there was to protect Car Source & provide 1st aid. There are hours of video of him standing at Car Source and at least one video of him providing 1st aid to a protestor with an injured ankle at Car Source.
November 27, 2025 at 2:27 PM