Shaina Sangha
@shaina-sangha.bsky.social
87 followers 110 following 17 posts
Policymaking team and formerly public finances @instituteforgovernment.org.uk. Former parliamentary staffer.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
shaina-sangha.bsky.social
If your blood pressure thinking about foreign affairs wasn't high enough, here's an @instituteforgovernment.org.uk explainer from me on defence spending.

How much do we spend? How much did we used to spend? What do we spend on? Questions asked, questions answered ...
instituteforgovernment.org.uk
With Russia’s invasion of Ukraine in 2022, and Trump’s return to the White House, defence spending has risen up the political agenda.

So how much does the UK spend – and how does this compare to its NATO allies? @shaina-sangha.bsky.social explains www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/explainer/uk...
UK defence spending | Institute for Government
Defence spending has grown in political salience in recent years.
www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk
Reposted by Shaina Sangha
drbenpaxton.bsky.social
Procurement is massively underrated as an opportunity for improvement, and where a mission-led approach could make a difference.
Our NEW REPORT explores why this change is hard, and how procurement should be used to shape markets + drive innovation🧵
www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/publication/...
The role of procurement in delivering mission-led government | Institute for Government
How can the government remove the barriers to its missions?
www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk
shaina-sangha.bsky.social
Great paper from Gemma, Tom and Jill, who have been thinking about how to do tax reform a lot longer than just this budget cycle.
Reposted by Shaina Sangha
Reposted by Shaina Sangha
teodorgrama.bsky.social
Great to see our latest @instituteforgovernment.org.uk report on the fast stream covered in The Guardian.

The civil service wants the fast stream to do too much, all at once. A smaller programme that is laser-focused on developing future leaders would deliver more for the civil service.
Civil service graduate talent scheme needs urgent reform, says thinktank
Exclusive: Institute for Government says failings are leading many fast streamers to leave programme early
www.theguardian.com
Reposted by Shaina Sangha
hannahkeenan.bsky.social
Think 2 big risks in No.10 shake-up are (a) more big figures & no clarity on who does what means duplicative work gumming up the system, and (b) the 'change the way the state works' bit of missions gets totally cannibalised by the 'deliver the plan for change targets' bit of missions.
Screenshot of text that reads: "By any measure, this is a big shake-up. In the PM's words, it is about moving the government into “phase two” and “ramping up the next phase of the government’s domestic agenda”. In more common parlance: it’s about getting stuff done. There are two traps Starmer must navigate through to give this set-up a chance of success: clarity and ambition.

First, by not being clear enough on who is responsible for what, especially in terms of delivering on Starmer’s priorities, the new look No 10 is at real risk of compounding some of the issues it seeks to resolve. I currently count at least four people doing this from the centre: Jones in his new role; Clara Swinson (appointed as second permanent secretary at the Cabinet Office last year and head of the Mission Delivery Unit); Pandit, who is reportedly staying on in a “new role leading on policy delivery in No10”; and Pat McFadden, whose responsibilities as Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster include “missions” and “supporting the delivery of the government’s priorities”. Add to that the Prime Minister’s private office (and a new PPS in Dan York-Smith who will want to show he ‘gets’ what Starmer is after), and the myriad of others in and around the centre who purport to speak for the Prime Minister, and the picture is looking very busy."
Reposted by Shaina Sangha
hannahkeenan.bsky.social
I am really very certain - having also seen 4 iterations of No.10 while working in the Cabinet Office - that adding more people to the centre of government is not the solution here.

If the shake-up is on, it better be a proper one.
shaina-sangha.bsky.social
All this to say that we should be aware of the ratio between *money spent upfront/time spent/norms broken/treaties exited* and *money saved* through these policies. There are MANY good reasons to do reform in this area but big savings for the exchequer are not high up the list. 6/7
shaina-sangha.bsky.social
This might be a salient issue for Farage and worthwhile to him to spend more money on than he can hope to recoup. Zia Yusuf has said this will net £7bn savings, need to see detail on this. But it will not shield any govt from the trifecta of tax rises, big spending cuts, or expensive borrowing. 5/7
shaina-sangha.bsky.social
In the short/med-term at least, a money saving measure, this is not! In long-term too, it is impossible to know what deterrent effect this will have and whether any savings will be delivered - the HO said this itself when asked to evaluate the impact of a Rwanda-style scheme a few years ago. 4/7
shaina-sangha.bsky.social
Though, incidentally, the amount Farage has put up (unclear from where) for returns deals would be £2bn so c.50% (presumably additionally) of what we currently spend on asylum plus all the costs (as yet unclear) of building new detention centres, exiting conventions etc. 3/7
shaina-sangha.bsky.social
There's money to save but of £23bn HO says it will spend in 25/26, £4.3bn (I note they often underestimate this a bit but nevertheless) will be on asylum related costs. You're now talking about 1/300th of total govt spend. 2/7
shaina-sangha.bsky.social
Re. Farage's £ figures in announcement today on asylum plans, this is not a big money saver for govt. HO's total managed expenditure (for police, asylum, national security etc) in 24/25 was £22.5bn. That's a lot but £8bn less than e.g. DfT and 1/13th of what DWP spends. 1/7
Reposted by Shaina Sangha
gilesyb.bsky.social
"look beyond AI and much of the economy appears sluggish. Real consumption has flatlined since December. Jobs growth is weak. Housebuilding has slumped, as has business investment in non-ai parts of the economy"
www.economist.com/finance-and-...
From The Economist
How America’s AI boom is squeezing the rest of the economy
Beware the data-centre takeover
www.economist.com
Reposted by Shaina Sangha
amberdellar.bsky.social
NEW REPORT: how does where you live and your background affect how you do at school?

- Inequalities have widened around the country and between groups of children since the pandemic

- Progress depends on sharing what works to support disadvantaged pupils & cutting high absence

🧵👇
Educational outcomes across England | Institute for Government
Examining the performance gaps in schools.
www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk
Reposted by Shaina Sangha
stuarthoddinott.bsky.social
I wonder how many times right wing think tanks can write the same report about the NHS

Seems we haven't reached the limit yet

200 pages to make the most boring (and worse, useless) set of policy recommendations
Reposted by Shaina Sangha
Reposted by Shaina Sangha
stuarthoddinott.bsky.social
Good write up of the 10 year plan from Nick Timmins:

- A lot of existing policy. But that's good: things like integration are laudable aims
- Focus on tech is welcome, but dependent on limited capital budgets
- Social care still needs addressing

www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/comment/nhs-...
Labour’s 10 Year Health Plan: familiar ideas could be frustrated by familiar problems | Institute for Government
There is plenty of the what but less of the how in Wes Streeting’s new plan.
www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk
Reposted by Shaina Sangha
drhannahwhite.bsky.social
“In many areas, the Labour government has introduced changes that are necessary and valuable and yet these have not been knitted together in a way that is sufficient to shift public perceptions of change” www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk/comment/labo...
Labour’s first year: Keir Starmer’s government is less than the sum of its parts | Institute for Government
Keir Starmer has yet to set out a clear governing philosophy.
www.instituteforgovernment.org.uk
Reposted by Shaina Sangha
gilesyb.bsky.social
So I noticed a jarring headline in the FT, saying "UK DISPOSABLE INCOME FALLS AT FASTEST RATE SINCE 2023"

and wondered if you were as bothered by it as I was.

I am here to say: fear not. Or rather, look at it like the graph down here: 1/

www.ft.com/content/08a1...
Reposted by Shaina Sangha
Reposted by Shaina Sangha
stuarthoddinott.bsky.social
Another Zia Yusuf tweet that shows a lack of understanding of how local govt works

1) Kent is not responsible for appointing auditors. Fees are set and auditors appointed by a body call Public Sector Audit Appointments (PSAA)