I'm wrapping up my research project.
Essentially, my disability benefits got cut, and I have tuition fees to pay. My freelance job is temperamental.
Please donate what you feel comfortable donating; no pressure.
gofund.me/d013948e
My dissertation might well be very short. I doubt I can produce enough mathematics for the degree.
Mileage varies for doctorates. They're each unique. This fact is also of no comfort.
My dissertation might well be very short. I doubt I can produce enough mathematics for the degree.
Mileage varies for doctorates. They're each unique. This fact is also of no comfort.
∃x(Px→∀yPx).
∃x(Px→∀yPx).
Fuck my life.
Fuck my life.
How well, in your opinion, does Conway's, "The Game of Life" describe life in general?
The game is "Turing complete"; I know that much. That means it can simulate any computer.
By the way, there is a free simulation of it via the Google Play store, called "Golly".
How well, in your opinion, does Conway's, "The Game of Life" describe life in general?
The game is "Turing complete"; I know that much. That means it can simulate any computer.
By the way, there is a free simulation of it via the Google Play store, called "Golly".
As a lay person in biology, I summarise the main thesis of Dawkins', "The Selfish Gene" to be: morality is game theory acting on genes, with memes (in the original sense of the word) taking over evolved instincts.
Would that be accurate?
Do his ideas still hold today?
As a lay person in biology, I summarise the main thesis of Dawkins', "The Selfish Gene" to be: morality is game theory acting on genes, with memes (in the original sense of the word) taking over evolved instincts.
Would that be accurate?
Do his ideas still hold today?
There are mathematical systems that model logics in which at least one of the laws of logic (i.e., identity, noncontradiction, and excluded middle) does not hold.
Do you think pointing to them would get past presuppositionalists' insistence we justify "faith" in logic?
There are mathematical systems that model logics in which at least one of the laws of logic (i.e., identity, noncontradiction, and excluded middle) does not hold.
Do you think pointing to them would get past presuppositionalists' insistence we justify "faith" in logic?
We’re still trying to work out how this math maths. Is he suggesting people are crossing illegally out of the US into Mexico and Canada? Math exposes the lie, but when reality is inconvenient, the authoritarian will simply demand a new one.
We’re still trying to work out how this math maths. Is he suggesting people are crossing illegally out of the US into Mexico and Canada? Math exposes the lie, but when reality is inconvenient, the authoritarian will simply demand a new one.
math.stackexchange.com/q/3570121/10...
math.stackexchange.com/q/3570121/10...
If you'd like to get me a gift, then thank you! - please consider helping me out with my tuition fees!
www.gofundme.com/f/final-stre...
If you'd like to get me a gift, then thank you! - please consider helping me out with my tuition fees!
www.gofundme.com/f/final-stre...
Essentially, my disability benefits got cut, and I have tuition fees to pay. My freelance job is temperamental.
Please donate what you feel comfortable donating; no pressure.
gofund.me/d013948e
Essentially, my disability benefits got cut, and I have tuition fees to pay. My freelance job is temperamental.
Please donate what you feel comfortable donating; no pressure.
gofund.me/d013948e
I need a helping hand, please:
gofund.me/d013948e
Would a superchat advertising my GoFundMe be welcome on TACIS?
I don't want to make any assumptions. You're not obliged to help.
I'm a little desperate.
I need a helping hand, please:
gofund.me/d013948e
Would a superchat advertising my GoFundMe be welcome on TACIS?
I don't want to make any assumptions. You're not obliged to help.
I'm a little desperate.
Maybe threaten people with Hell.
Maybe threaten people with Hell.