Keep a vault in git and load the repo up with Claude Code commands to quickly create new docs and all sorts of other Claude magic.

And surely you’re aware that wealth-inequality is not a measure of quality? It must be coupled with poverty rates, median income, and/or absolute income.

Is a society where everyone is wealthy & healthy yet some are more-so bad?

Is a society where everyone is equally impoverished good?

What’s the downside of raising the wealth floor and giving every child access to experiencing compounding wealth?

This seems like a win?

To that end, the Build Canada team has worked with entrepreneurs in our network to craft mandate letters for specific ministries that we believe will help transform the party’s policy agenda into action.

Read them here: www.buildcanada.com/memos/mandat...

Read the full survey findings here: www.buildcanada.com/memos/ready-...

There’s surely many reasons why they are projected to go from 24 seats to ~9.

Dumb stuff like this isn’t helping.

Do I want to see an NDP majority government? No.

But I do want to see very strong representation of the party in Parliament.

It’s because I'd like to see a strong NDP that ludicrous policy like this brings me to post about it.

tl;dr

One may concede there are both pros and cons in taxing the realized wealth of the very wealthy.

I’m unaware of any valid argument in taxing any amount of unrealized capital gains.

You must be new here

I’ve long adored @thetyee.ca. I subscribed to their newsletter in 2006.

But why not explore the impact canadaspends.com and @buildcanada.com is making as much of it aligns with the values of their readers.

Instead they pulled a sort of uno-reversy Fox News type piece or whatever this is.