SHERA Research Group International Collective researchers MVAWC
@sheraresearch.bsky.social
1.6K followers 3K following 360 posts
#Health #Social #Rights #Familycourt #violenceagainstwomen #Children #CSA Insta:@sherafamily_ X: @sherafamily WARNING: SHERAFAMILLE IS A FAKE ACCOUNT https://www.shera-research.com Some LTs: https://linktr.ee/elizabethdalgarno1 https://linktr.ee/dremmakatz
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
sheraresearch.bsky.social
This post explores ‘Freedom Day’- the day children can no longer be forced into contact with an abusive parent, nor subjected to interference from courts. It marks the end of a long, traumatic process, & the beginning of another: the aftermath... drelizabethdalgarno.substack.com/p/freedom-da...
'Freedom Day': When the Family Court Lets Go, but the Damage Remains
The day they say women and child victim-survivors are 'free' from Family Court proceedings, but they've already lost too much.
drelizabethdalgarno.substack.com
sheraresearch.bsky.social
#reproductiveabuse #reproductivecoercion #familycourt #familylaw
sheraresearch.bsky.social
This post discusses reproductive coercion of #mothers/#women in the family courts and the linked outcomes for #children. It attends to the clear contradictions between health policies that promote mother-child bonds & legal policies that suppress this drelizabethdalgarno.substack.com/p/the-family...
“The [Family] Court Took My Baby": Reproductive Coercion/Abuse in the Name of Fathers' Rights.
'Neutral' Law, Coercive Outcomes: How Family Courts Police Reproduction
drelizabethdalgarno.substack.com
sheraresearch.bsky.social
University of Hiroshima, Brunel University, University of Ottawa, Equality Now, The National Family Violence Law Center, and many more to report on the current situations in Colombia, Brazil, Japan, Sri Lanka, Africa, Spain, the UK, the USA, Canada and beyond. More details soon.
sheraresearch.bsky.social
This year, we have world-leading expert speakers from the World Health Organization and SVRI - Sexual Violence Research Initiative, Association of Clinical Psychologists UK, Right to Equality,
sheraresearch.bsky.social
(including but not limited to unregulated experts, systemic reforms, use of parental alienation theories / alternative approaches and solutions).
sheraresearch.bsky.social
Save the date! October 7th 2025:

#Familycourt #HealthJustice #Global #postseparationabuse

Join us for a free online ground-breaking Health Justice Conference focussing on global insights into the family courts and health/human rights impacts for victim survivor women and children
Reposted by SHERA Research Group International Collective researchers MVAWC
clerotto.bsky.social
Little Red Riding Hood's bedtime reading
Enough to make you scream
Well done Nic & Liz @sheraresearch.bsky.social for making waves
No Samba but a dance in Durham Hills for the ink blot witch makers & expert fakers
committees.parliament.uk/writtenevide...

Everybody Scream
youtu.be/03iBgkXb1EE?...
Reposted by SHERA Research Group International Collective researchers MVAWC
claremcglynn.bsky.social
"This is not misogyny by accident, it is by design"
My comment on the latest example of AI tech being released without a care about its adverse uses and impacts, particularly on women and girls.
www.bbc.co.uk/news/article...
Pornographic Taylor Swift deepfakes generated by Musk's Grok AI
Grok Imagine's
www.bbc.co.uk
sheraresearch.bsky.social
We must take urgent steps to address the ongoing and ever-present harm our #familycourts are causing. Our justice systems should protect victim-survivors and not be a tool for further #postseparationabuse of women and children drelizabethdalgarno.substack.com/p/whats-love...
https://drelizabethdalgarno.substack.com/p/whats-love-got-to-do-with-it-post
sheraresearch.bsky.social
Also: Judges should be “on their guard” re expert witness evidence, according to supreme court judge, who urged legal profession to improve their “scientific and technical literacy” with problems with “people coming forward claiming expertise in pseudoscience” www.theguardian.com/law/2025/aug...
Judge tells colleagues to be ‘on their guard’ over expert witness evidence
Patrick Hodge, supreme court’s deputy president, wants judges to improve their scientific and technical literacy
www.theguardian.com
sheraresearch.bsky.social
Thank you Jessica Bradley for this important piece on #familycourt with quotes from two of our core members Dr Dalgarno and Dr Barnett
and @drproudman.bsky.social. Rosie said ‘this isn’t parental alienation – we’ve been abused’. Re Dr Maria Downs www.sheffieldtribune.co.uk/the-harmful-...
The ‘harmful pseudo-science’ infecting Sheffield’s family courts
Dr Maria Downs and the extraordinary growth of ‘parental alienation’
www.sheffieldtribune.co.uk
sheraresearch.bsky.social
@seethrujustice.transparencyproject.org.uk is it saying litigants are bound by professional rules or the home setting is or both? in law, it seems this is not right in either case
sheraresearch.bsky.social
Key recommendations for #familycourt #familylaw to be presented again to the UN Human Rights Council in June 2025
Key recommendations for family courts:

93. Accelerate the conclusion of the inquiry into the mother and Baby Homes in Northern Ireland ensuring effective access to truth, justice and reparations and taking into consideration lessons learned from similar inquiries.

94 Urgently and swiftly prohibit the use of parental alienation and related pseudo-science concepts, appoint only experts who are fully qualified psychologists or psychiatrists; that are regulated by the HCPC and that have regular accredited domestic abuse training. Ensure an end to the of parental involvement between abusive parents and their children at all costs. Prohibit the removal of children from the parent they live with for the purpose of restarting, repairing or improving the child’s relationship with the other parent.
sheraresearch.bsky.social
Thank you UN Special Rapporteur #VAWG Reem Alsalem #familycourt

Again the Special Rapporteur recommends #parentalalienation frameworks be prohibited from use in FC, calls for abuse and trauma informed regulated experts in #familycourt & an end to the #presumptionofinvolvement for abusive parents
2.         Beyond legal barriers, family courts have been criticized for prioritizing parental contact and involvement over the safety of children, sometimes granting access to fathers despite serious allegations and even findings of abuse. Courts repeatedly disregarded domestic violence evidence, instead framing protective mothers as engaging in "parental alienation" With mothers being advised not to raise allegations of domestic violence or child sexual abuse in case they are accused of “parental alienation.” Mothers are also threatened with the removal of their children if they seek to protect their children by limiting contact with abusive fathers. In many cases, children’s voices are not heard or listened to. Such cases expose deep flaws in the system, where the presumption of parental involvement can override safeguarding concerns  - links to our paper in bio open access 81. Mothers who have lost the care of their children as a result of custody cases are struggling to come to terms with the loss. They face systematic challenges in accessing justice, exacerbated by legal aid cuts, court biases, and a failure to prioritize child safety in cases involving domestic abuse. The 2013 Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act removed legal aid from most private family law cases, forcing many parents, especially mothers, to represent themselves. By 2024 over half of mothers in custody disputes appeared in court without a lawyer[1], and by 2017, 21,852 parents applied for private law child arrangement cases without legal representation—a 134% increase from 2011[2]. This lack of legal support disproportionately affects lower-income mothers. The result is often prolonged cases, psychological distress, denial of justice and a growing family court backlog, which stood at over100,000 children as of 2013[3]. The lack of justice has forced many mothers to escape the UK to jurisdictions not covered by the Hague Convention on Child Abductions. 44. The UK government’s Violence Against Women and Girls Strategy emphasizes prevention, previously allocating £6.6 million over three years (2022-2025) to this end. However, a significant challenge persists including: Framing violence against women and girls predominantly as a criminal justice issue, focusing on punishing offenders rather than investing adequately in the systemic and societal changes required to address root causes. Prevention efforts remain underfunded, while the implementation of protective measures, victim compensation, and rehabilitation is weak. This punitive approach, coupled with poor enforcement of court judgments and protection orders fosters a sense of impunity for perpetrators, undermining progress. 
45. Specialist services for girls and young women under 25, who face disproportionate rates of domestic abuse, are critical yet insufficient. Statutory agencies are positioned to identify and intervene early, but without robust investment, many women at risk are left without support, leading to trauma, school exclusion, or entanglement in the criminal justice system. Efforts to shift harmful social norms, particularly among boys and men, such as Scotland’s Equally Safe strategy, which aims to ensure that young people develop mutually respectful, responsible and confident relationships[1]  are to be commended. However, the £6.6 million investment in such policies pales against the scale of need (3.5 million boys) and the scale of sexual and gender-based violence. 

[35                      NSPCC, Child sexual abuse: statistics briefing.
                    [36]       Adrienne Barnett, Domestic abuse and private law cases: A literature Review, Ministry of Justice, 2020.
                    [37]       https://rapecrisis.org.uk/get-informed/breaking-point/?utm_source=chatgpt.com.
                    [38]       https://www.executiveoffice-ni.gov.uk/articles/truth-recovery-design-panel. 
                    [39]       https://ombudsman.ie/en/publi… 57. Women and girls with disabilities in the UK are particularly vulnerable to sexual and gender-based violence, discrimination, and abuse, yet the response from authorities is often inadequate. The Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities raised concerns in 2017, stating that the rights of women and girls with disabilities have not been systematically integrated into gender equality and disability agendas, with a lack of data and measures addressing the compounded effects of multiple and intersectional discrimination[1]. Women and girls with psychosocial disabilities face significant obstacles when attempting to access justice. The prevalent practice of restricting legal capacity makes it difficult for these women to initiate or participate in legal proceedings, and their testimonies are often met with skepticism/ Service providers also tend to be slow in responding to financial abuse, further exacerbating their vulnerability.[2]

                    [1]       Ibid.
        [2]  https://www.wbg.org.uk/article/cuts-to-social-security-for-disabled-women/.
r stereotypes.