In my view, it is comfortable but also careless to assume that the US wouldn't take the 'irrational' act and break their major alliance over Greenland. Trump is not a rational actor and the US administration might have been weakened to the point where they cannot stop his impulses in time.

Politico is also mentioning Canada and the Netherlands as participants www.politico.eu/article/denm...

Well, it made me google the correct information at least, so in that it has had the intended effect. But I can tell you that I will generally dismiss information from a source that seems to contain errors that are obvious at a glance.

Like, I do not mean to offend, but it seems pretty clear if the correct information and a curated image is available to you, why would you create (or generate) a subpar alternative and use that for your post? It just undermines your point.

Fair enough. But then my question is, why not use this image in the first place, given the image used in the first post is wildly inaccurate?

Like, especially if you want to make a point about factual things not matching what someone says, this is a bad way to go about it. It just gives the impression of asking AI to generate something and then not doing the slightest bit of quality control on the resulting image....

For another example, Thule Air Base and Pittufik space base are the same base, but placed differently in both images. (Also, both locations are wrong, see attached image).

Also, the Baffin Bay is west of Grenland inbetween it and Canada, not east at the Atlantic Ocean etc.

Sadly, this visual is badly made (or more likely, badly generated). I don't know how close it is to the truth but the obvious problems (see for example the azimuthal projection in the bottom left) make me mistrust the rest of the contained information.

Well, Greenland, Taiwan and Ukraine are not the sum total of "other global affairs" (and even then, this probably has some knock-on effects).

But obviously, there are larger implications for global affairs in e.g. Panama and Cuba.

The problem here might be that classically, the "E3" would include Italy (besides Germany and France).

Meinem Laienverständnis nach §78, Abs. 5 "Soweit die Geschäftsordnung nichts anderes vorschreibt oder zuläßt, beginnen die Beratungen der Vorlagen frühestens am dritten Tage nach Verteilung der Drucksachen (§ 123)." in Verbindung mit §75, Abs. 1 (g)

The relevant § here is §126

Well, there is a mention of "no german liability for the liabilities of other states", which is a talking point strongly associated with "no common debt" (Z. 4363 f).