Svend-Erik Skaaning
@skaaning.bsky.social
1.4K followers 360 following 27 posts
Professor of political science, Aarhus University Democratization, autocratization, state capacity, cross-national comparisons, social science history
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Svend-Erik Skaaning
lotemhalevy.bsky.social
And another great potential read for graduate students on the measurement of "waves" of democratization and autocratization by @skaaning.bsky.social especially helpful for students thinking about periodization (including thinking about the contemporary "moment").

doi.org/10.1080/1351...
Reposted by Svend-Erik Skaaning
janvogler.bsky.social
🚨 Are you interested in Historical Political Economy? 🚨

At the Virtual Workshop in HPE (VWHPE)—organized jointly with @dkofanov.bsky.social & @tinepaulsen.bsky.social—we discuss state-of-the-art research on a regular basis.

‼️ We have just issued a new call for papers. ‼️

Link & info in post #2.
Reposted by Svend-Erik Skaaning
polstudies.bsky.social
How do different forms of state capacity protect democracy? Andersen, @chknutsen.bsky.social & @skaaning.bsky.social argue coercive & administrative capacity affect stability in distinct ways depending on the threat: buff.ly/Q4HDylB

@polstudiesassoc.bsky.social @uoypolitics.bsky.social @sagepub.com
Reposted by Svend-Erik Skaaning
polstudies.bsky.social
How do different forms of state capacity protect democracy? D Andersen, @chknutsen.bsky.social & @skaaning.bsky.social argue coercive & administrative capacity affect stability in distinct ways depending on threat: buff.ly/Q4HDylB

@polstudiesassoc.bsky.social @uoypolitics.bsky.social @sagepub.com
skaaning.bsky.social
Happy to have been part this new publication on the relationship between different dimensions of state capacity and modes of democratic breakdown!
chknutsen.bsky.social
Does higher state capacity go together with lower risk of democratic breakdown? Many political scientists certainly believe so!

Yet, in an article just published in @polstudies.bsky.social , David Andersen, @skaaning.bsky.social and I highlight important nuances to this general relationship.
skaaning.bsky.social
Min bog - Dansk demokrati i perspektiv - skrevet med David Andersen og udarbejdet i forbindelse med Magtudredningen 2.0 er netop udgivet! Gratis E-bog og gratis lydbog er tilgængelige her:
unipress.dk/udgiv.../d/d...
unipress.dk
Reposted by Svend-Erik Skaaning
rsenninger.bsky.social
📣 Jobs, jobs, jobs!

Aarhus University’s Department of Political Science is hiring:

🔹 Assistant Professor
🗓 Deadline: 25 August
🔗 international.au.dk/about/profil...

🔹 Associate Professor
🗓 Deadline: 8 September
🔗 international.au.dk/about/profil...
Reposted by Svend-Erik Skaaning
janvogler.bsky.social
After 10 years of doing research in Historical Political Economy, this fall I’ll finally get a chance to teach a survey course on the field & I’m really looking forward to it! 😊

I thought this would be an opportunity to create a syllabus with many essential contributions to this growing field.
skaaning.bsky.social
Thanks again for organizing! It was, indeed, a great workshop!
Reposted by Svend-Erik Skaaning
lisajanssen.bsky.social
What a pleasure to direct this amazing @ecpr.bsky.social Joint sessions workshop on citizens democratic commitment with Hannah Werner - thanks to all participants for the exciting papers and stimulating discussions!
skaaning.bsky.social
The same haircut - and the best. Welcome to the club ;-)
Reposted by Svend-Erik Skaaning
kristianvsf.bsky.social
🛎️New WP with @morganlcj.bsky.social @timallinger.bsky.social and @danbischof.bsky.social

Against the surge of conjoints and other hypothetical experiments in relation to democratic backsliding, we study the consequences of using hypotheticals versus real-world scenarios.

osf.io/preprints/os...
Reposted by Svend-Erik Skaaning
danbischof.bsky.social
🚨 working paper (w. @morganlcj.bsky.social @markuswagner.bsky.social): Protesters are not judged equally - even if tactics of groups are similar.

We ran an experiment in 🇩🇪 testing how people react to farmers vs. climate activists blocking roads.

What we find is disturbing:

osf.io/preprints/os...
skaaning.bsky.social
The article closes with an examination of the association between de jure constitutional provisions and de facto observance of the rule of law. A two-way fixed effects regression analysis covering most independent countries from 1850 to 2010, identifies a NEGATIVE but substantively weak association.
skaaning.bsky.social
It also examines the co-variation with alternative measures. The pairwise correlations with the V‑Dem index are 0.88 (Freedom House), 0.89 (World Governance Indicators), and 0.91 (World Justice Project).
skaaning.bsky.social
The paper presents the theoretical (minimalist, procedural) underpinning of the definition and selection of indicators from different parts of the V-Dem experts survey. It also demonstrates that the indicators tap into a common underlying dimension and show high levels of scalability.
Reposted by Svend-Erik Skaaning
kunkakom.bsky.social
🚨 We're hiring! Join us at @LMU_Muenchen for the DFG-funded project "Democratic Persuasion: How to Make the Case for Democracy."

Interested in making scholarly & societal impact?

We’re looking for:
🔹 1 Postdoc (100%)
🔹 1 PhD researcher (70%)
Starting: Oct 2025 | Apply by: July 8
More info ⬇️ (1/7)
skaaning.bsky.social
Interested in debates about how to measure democracy and/or the use of observable and judgmental indicators? Then check out this piece.
danpemstein.com
A few years ago, @danweitzel.net, John Gerring, @skaaning.bsky.social and I were curious how well one could predict subjective democracy measures using easy(ish) to code observables. Turns out, *quite* well, even out of sample. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/...
Measuring electoral democracy with observables

Most cross-national indices of democracy rely centrally on coder judgments, which are susceptible to bias and error, and require expensive and time consuming coding by experts. We present an approach to measurement based on observables that aim to preserve the nuanced quality of subjectively coded democracy indices. Our observable-to-subjective score mapping is free of idiosyncratic coder errors arising from misinformation, slack, or biases. It is less susceptible to systematic bias that may arise from coders’ inferences about a country’s regime, for example, from the ideology of the ruler. The data collection procedure and mode of analysis are fully transparent and replicable, and the procedure is based on random forests and is cheap to produce, easy to update, and offers coverage for all polities with sovereign or semisovereign status, surpassing the sample of any existing index. We show that this expansive coverage makes a big difference to our understanding of some causal questions.
Reposted by Svend-Erik Skaaning
skaaning.bsky.social
There is widespread skepticism regarding the use of AI tools to generate offensive content both in absolute terms and compared to similar statements by individuals. There is stronger support for allowing governments and tech companies to restrict the use of generative AI tools than social media.