Drew Jones
@skiptotheend.bsky.social
World's leading Dunning-Kruger expert.
She will be condemning him for revoking Roe vs Wade any day now. Any day now.
January 18, 2026 at 8:48 PM
She will be condemning him for revoking Roe vs Wade any day now. Any day now.
*that person's behaviour is found to *not* legally amount to harassment.
January 16, 2026 at 5:28 PM
*that person's behaviour is found to *not* legally amount to harassment.
Wow. That's quite the company brand there.
January 16, 2026 at 5:21 PM
Wow. That's quite the company brand there.
Looks like it. If you accuse trans people of harassment and undermining your dignity then your employer must take it seriously even when that trans person has displayed behaviour that there is no legal grounds to call harassment.
January 16, 2026 at 1:11 PM
Looks like it. If you accuse trans people of harassment and undermining your dignity then your employer must take it seriously even when that trans person has displayed behaviour that there is no legal grounds to call harassment.
I'm not legally literate so I don't understand how the Trust is meant to take seriously complaints about a person, when that person's behaviour is found to legally amount to harassment.
Some complaints are not serious but kneejerk bigotry.
Some complaints are not serious but kneejerk bigotry.
January 16, 2026 at 1:07 PM
I'm not legally literate so I don't understand how the Trust is meant to take seriously complaints about a person, when that person's behaviour is found to legally amount to harassment.
Some complaints are not serious but kneejerk bigotry.
Some complaints are not serious but kneejerk bigotry.
Do you acknowledge that the Bible as a whole demonstrates and attributes bigotry, xenophobia, misogyny, violent retribution, slavery to God?
January 16, 2026 at 5:18 AM
Do you acknowledge that the Bible as a whole demonstrates and attributes bigotry, xenophobia, misogyny, violent retribution, slavery to God?
That is not a necessary process for being able to identify as a Christian. How are you so unaware of how sectarian and widely interpreted Christianity is?
January 16, 2026 at 5:13 AM
That is not a necessary process for being able to identify as a Christian. How are you so unaware of how sectarian and widely interpreted Christianity is?
Not True Christians?
January 16, 2026 at 5:10 AM
Not True Christians?
'Identifying Christians' are Christians because your No True Scotsman is only rationalisation that is meaningful to you.
January 16, 2026 at 5:09 AM
'Identifying Christians' are Christians because your No True Scotsman is only rationalisation that is meaningful to you.
It's also the former. Whether you like it or not those billions are formally recognised as Christians. Maybe not *true Christians* but Christians none the less.
January 16, 2026 at 5:07 AM
It's also the former. Whether you like it or not those billions are formally recognised as Christians. Maybe not *true Christians* but Christians none the less.
I am. I'm criticising your poor understanding of the No True Scotsman fallacy and application of it.
January 16, 2026 at 5:05 AM
I am. I'm criticising your poor understanding of the No True Scotsman fallacy and application of it.
Maybe. More over my argument is that the standards for being Christian aren't formalised or monitored by an active authority today.
January 16, 2026 at 5:03 AM
Maybe. More over my argument is that the standards for being Christian aren't formalised or monitored by an active authority today.
It's your rhetoric that dismisses them. That's not a way of removing them from belief in Christianity. Some Christians are badly behaved and remain Christian despite it because Christianity isn't a belief system that necessarily makes people good.
January 16, 2026 at 5:01 AM
It's your rhetoric that dismisses them. That's not a way of removing them from belief in Christianity. Some Christians are badly behaved and remain Christian despite it because Christianity isn't a belief system that necessarily makes people good.
Yeah, the Bible itself encourages the No True Scotsman and poisoning the well fallacy.
January 16, 2026 at 4:59 AM
Yeah, the Bible itself encourages the No True Scotsman and poisoning the well fallacy.
It's not a clear distinction that is monitored and enforced, like a formalised membership. That's why your appeal to academic exceptions if the No True Scotsman fails. It's the arbitrary, selectively judged boundaries cropped out of your screenshot.
January 16, 2026 at 4:57 AM
It's not a clear distinction that is monitored and enforced, like a formalised membership. That's why your appeal to academic exceptions if the No True Scotsman fails. It's the arbitrary, selectively judged boundaries cropped out of your screenshot.
Have you ever spoken to these people? How easily they dismiss your Christianity? They can quite easily cherry pick Matthew 5:18-5:20. They don't want to get rid of the Old Testament, the Mosaic law as that contains the 10 Commandments. Also has original sin and all the stuff Christianity relies on.
January 16, 2026 at 4:55 AM
Have you ever spoken to these people? How easily they dismiss your Christianity? They can quite easily cherry pick Matthew 5:18-5:20. They don't want to get rid of the Old Testament, the Mosaic law as that contains the 10 Commandments. Also has original sin and all the stuff Christianity relies on.
All those judgy Christians would also say it's not them judging, they are just the messenger passing on what God/Jesus wants and will judge people for.
It's how it all works. Everyone uses their god to lend authority to their preferences and cherry picked ideals.
It's how it all works. Everyone uses their god to lend authority to their preferences and cherry picked ideals.
January 16, 2026 at 4:48 AM
All those judgy Christians would also say it's not them judging, they are just the messenger passing on what God/Jesus wants and will judge people for.
It's how it all works. Everyone uses their god to lend authority to their preferences and cherry picked ideals.
It's how it all works. Everyone uses their god to lend authority to their preferences and cherry picked ideals.
That is not direct speech. It's all attributed to Jesus by the Gospel writers. We don't even know who wrote the Gospels, they too are attributed to Matthew, Mark, Luke and John.
January 16, 2026 at 4:45 AM
That is not direct speech. It's all attributed to Jesus by the Gospel writers. We don't even know who wrote the Gospels, they too are attributed to Matthew, Mark, Luke and John.
Yeah, you can extrapolate from the parable if you are inclined. Still doesn't make it a biblically defined term.
January 16, 2026 at 4:42 AM
Yeah, you can extrapolate from the parable if you are inclined. Still doesn't make it a biblically defined term.
Jesus isn't around monitoring and policing conduct and belief in him. That's how.
January 16, 2026 at 4:40 AM
Jesus isn't around monitoring and policing conduct and belief in him. That's how.
This is all No True Scotsman and special pleading. Christianity is what people who identify as Christians do, not what you insist must be done to be "actual Christians".
That "actual Christianity" is NTS fallacy stuff.
That "actual Christianity" is NTS fallacy stuff.
January 16, 2026 at 4:38 AM
This is all No True Scotsman and special pleading. Christianity is what people who identify as Christians do, not what you insist must be done to be "actual Christians".
That "actual Christianity" is NTS fallacy stuff.
That "actual Christianity" is NTS fallacy stuff.
Tiny little babies are baptised and accepted into church communities and Christianity before they are out of nappies, let alone talking and able to intellectually consent to the conditions you insist are necessary.
January 16, 2026 at 4:35 AM
Tiny little babies are baptised and accepted into church communities and Christianity before they are out of nappies, let alone talking and able to intellectually consent to the conditions you insist are necessary.
This is the No True Scotsman fallacy.
January 16, 2026 at 4:33 AM
This is the No True Scotsman fallacy.
Who is formally overseeing Christianity making sure the members are complying with the conditions of membership?
No one. It's not a tightly defined and monitored system. It's self-policing and each has their own subjective rules and standards.
No one. It's not a tightly defined and monitored system. It's self-policing and each has their own subjective rules and standards.
January 16, 2026 at 4:33 AM
Who is formally overseeing Christianity making sure the members are complying with the conditions of membership?
No one. It's not a tightly defined and monitored system. It's self-policing and each has their own subjective rules and standards.
No one. It's not a tightly defined and monitored system. It's self-policing and each has their own subjective rules and standards.
That's why I am not immediately recognising it as authoritative even though you can ultimately claim each separate quote that forms the whole was originally attributed to Jesus.
January 15, 2026 at 10:47 PM
That's why I am not immediately recognising it as authoritative even though you can ultimately claim each separate quote that forms the whole was originally attributed to Jesus.