SkiSkinnySkis
@skiskinnyskis.bsky.social
This is why you don't allow clear judicial coups by corrupt and illegitimate justices to reempower violent traitors that attacked the US Capitol.
It's insane how badly Biden violated his oaths and duties to the Constitution.
It's insane how badly Biden violated his oaths and duties to the Constitution.
December 6, 2025 at 2:25 AM
This is why you don't allow clear judicial coups by corrupt and illegitimate justices to reempower violent traitors that attacked the US Capitol.
It's insane how badly Biden violated his oaths and duties to the Constitution.
It's insane how badly Biden violated his oaths and duties to the Constitution.
LBJ failing to execute Nixon for his Vietnam treason was the start.
December 6, 2025 at 2:19 AM
LBJ failing to execute Nixon for his Vietnam treason was the start.
The most pathetic thing is he begs Trump and the GOP to crap on his disabled son.
December 6, 2025 at 2:16 AM
The most pathetic thing is he begs Trump and the GOP to crap on his disabled son.
Expansion is the easiest classical path. But reducing the number of justices doesn't need congress, just a prez willing to use the powers the treasonous court provided.
December 6, 2025 at 12:52 AM
Expansion is the easiest classical path. But reducing the number of justices doesn't need congress, just a prez willing to use the powers the treasonous court provided.
Garland was Biden.
December 5, 2025 at 12:42 AM
Garland was Biden.
Biden was the true failure not only for Garland but also for never even attempting to enforce the 14th Sec 3 despite having a clear constitution duty to do so.
December 5, 2025 at 12:38 AM
Biden was the true failure not only for Garland but also for never even attempting to enforce the 14th Sec 3 despite having a clear constitution duty to do so.
Actually much more so in that they pulled a clear judicial coup to reempower that violent insurrectionist.
December 5, 2025 at 12:24 AM
Actually much more so in that they pulled a clear judicial coup to reempower that violent insurrectionist.
This is why it's extremely problematic to allow clear judicial coups that reempower violent insurrectionists.
December 5, 2025 at 12:23 AM
This is why it's extremely problematic to allow clear judicial coups that reempower violent insurrectionists.
I mean that really should have ended when the same court pulled a clear judicial coup to reempower a violent insurrectionist who led an attack on the literal US capitol.
December 5, 2025 at 12:14 AM
I mean that really should have ended when the same court pulled a clear judicial coup to reempower a violent insurrectionist who led an attack on the literal US capitol.
This is why you don't allow judicial coups to reempower violent traitors.
December 5, 2025 at 12:06 AM
This is why you don't allow judicial coups to reempower violent traitors.
This is what happens when you allow a corrupt and illegitimate court to pull a clear judicial coup for a violent insurrectionist and do nothing.
December 5, 2025 at 12:03 AM
This is what happens when you allow a corrupt and illegitimate court to pull a clear judicial coup for a violent insurrectionist and do nothing.
Conservatives take tremendous pride in being dumber than dogshit.
December 4, 2025 at 9:19 PM
Conservatives take tremendous pride in being dumber than dogshit.
Kalshi is more like Vegas/ sports betting and corrupt easily riggable bets for anything and everything.
Still really bad, but not necessarily digital tulips like Bitcoin is. His idiotic description in the clip doesn't help.
Still really bad, but not necessarily digital tulips like Bitcoin is. His idiotic description in the clip doesn't help.
December 3, 2025 at 10:10 PM
Kalshi is more like Vegas/ sports betting and corrupt easily riggable bets for anything and everything.
Still really bad, but not necessarily digital tulips like Bitcoin is. His idiotic description in the clip doesn't help.
Still really bad, but not necessarily digital tulips like Bitcoin is. His idiotic description in the clip doesn't help.
Unfortunately, J6 was also a golden opportunity , and look at how the Biden and the Ds totally fumbled that.
December 3, 2025 at 5:42 PM
Unfortunately, J6 was also a golden opportunity , and look at how the Biden and the Ds totally fumbled that.
No, she's a braindead cultist.
December 3, 2025 at 2:58 PM
No, she's a braindead cultist.
Him crying about mild criticism on Bluesky and then going back to Twitter was a huge red flag.
December 3, 2025 at 3:49 AM
Him crying about mild criticism on Bluesky and then going back to Twitter was a huge red flag.
Well open book take home stuff likely is rather doomed, but I don't think either of those is a huge necessity in creating better tests or tests that aren't just narrowly measuring test taking under strict time pressure.
December 2, 2025 at 7:21 PM
Well open book take home stuff likely is rather doomed, but I don't think either of those is a huge necessity in creating better tests or tests that aren't just narrowly measuring test taking under strict time pressure.
That way, being given extra time has little to no beneficial impact on those not disabled.
This might end up as "all" get extra time, but with better time insensitive tests that's likely a move in the right direction.
This might end up as "all" get extra time, but with better time insensitive tests that's likely a move in the right direction.
December 2, 2025 at 7:14 PM
That way, being given extra time has little to no beneficial impact on those not disabled.
This might end up as "all" get extra time, but with better time insensitive tests that's likely a move in the right direction.
This might end up as "all" get extra time, but with better time insensitive tests that's likely a move in the right direction.
For testing and time limits the problem is more that if you have a test that is super sensitive to time limits, then you have a bad test that is only testing a very narrow skill (ie taking tests under time pressure).
We should be aiming to create better tests that are more time insensitive.
We should be aiming to create better tests that are more time insensitive.
December 2, 2025 at 7:10 PM
For testing and time limits the problem is more that if you have a test that is super sensitive to time limits, then you have a bad test that is only testing a very narrow skill (ie taking tests under time pressure).
We should be aiming to create better tests that are more time insensitive.
We should be aiming to create better tests that are more time insensitive.
Also, absolutism just isn't morally tenable in my view. There are plenty of real world example where killing/murder was the least worst outcome, and also plenty of cases where failing to kill someone led to disastrous results and exponentially more suffering and deaths.
December 2, 2025 at 6:57 PM
Also, absolutism just isn't morally tenable in my view. There are plenty of real world example where killing/murder was the least worst outcome, and also plenty of cases where failing to kill someone led to disastrous results and exponentially more suffering and deaths.
My problem is I just don't believe the absolutists and often they are just lying or lying to themselves.
You go back in their timeliness, and sure enough 9 times out of 10 you find them celebrating a killing or murder.
You go back in their timeliness, and sure enough 9 times out of 10 you find them celebrating a killing or murder.
December 2, 2025 at 6:52 PM
My problem is I just don't believe the absolutists and often they are just lying or lying to themselves.
You go back in their timeliness, and sure enough 9 times out of 10 you find them celebrating a killing or murder.
You go back in their timeliness, and sure enough 9 times out of 10 you find them celebrating a killing or murder.
The bottom line is that there are indeed situations where murder/killing is the least worst realistic option.
December 2, 2025 at 6:38 PM
The bottom line is that there are indeed situations where murder/killing is the least worst realistic option.
Premeditated, not in the heat of the moment.
Possibly without cause or provocation, but most uses aren't that strict.
Possibly without cause or provocation, but most uses aren't that strict.
December 2, 2025 at 5:58 PM
Premeditated, not in the heat of the moment.
Possibly without cause or provocation, but most uses aren't that strict.
Possibly without cause or provocation, but most uses aren't that strict.
Ah so "murder not so cool" becomes "murder not so cool in this specific case".
Which is fine BTW, but it is simpler to just state that from the get-go.
Which is fine BTW, but it is simpler to just state that from the get-go.
December 2, 2025 at 5:49 PM
Ah so "murder not so cool" becomes "murder not so cool in this specific case".
Which is fine BTW, but it is simpler to just state that from the get-go.
Which is fine BTW, but it is simpler to just state that from the get-go.