Jase Gehring
banner
skyjase.bsky.social
Jase Gehring
@skyjase.bsky.social
scientist at UC Berkeley inventing advanced genomic technologies

lover of molecules, user of computers

https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=63ZRebIAAAAJ&hl=en
O sorry we deleted your personal and professional information. Thats definitely a thing we would do 🖕
a close up of a woman 's face with a disney logo on the bottom right
ALT: a close up of a woman 's face with a disney logo on the bottom right
media.tenor.com
January 23, 2026 at 5:46 PM
can't deal with this right now
January 23, 2026 at 7:11 AM
the reason they put it in quotes and included 'scientific' is because theyre not talking about general intelligence. it's an agentic system that can design, execute, and evaluate experiments.
January 23, 2026 at 4:03 AM
gpt pretending like swearing doesn’t work when it definitely fucking works
January 22, 2026 at 11:22 PM
I agree. this strongly aligns with my views on general intelligence. Causality, embodiment, and continual learning. This is the way
January 22, 2026 at 8:12 PM
This system makes the most sense in the context of a highly automated biotech lab. It wont be as flexible or creative as humans for a while. I don’t know the real answer to your question. My boss is very worried. I’m focused on progress
January 22, 2026 at 8:04 PM
necessary? no. Useful? Hell yes. Science is an algorithm. Automation is already fundamental to science. This just takes it to another level
January 22, 2026 at 8:02 PM
scis quis
January 22, 2026 at 6:22 PM
heard talk of some shenanigans at nature methods recently. they seem in disarray. if not there, then yikes nature is having some *issues* across their ecosystem
January 22, 2026 at 6:14 PM
Super cool, thanks
January 22, 2026 at 5:10 PM
What is the number that makes Elon a trillionaire? That much
January 22, 2026 at 5:04 PM
I am thoroughly preserved, on the inside. Thank you, Ronald
January 22, 2026 at 12:59 AM
as an outsider these are often my favorite sections of deep learning papers. if you're in the field, i could see how it would be annoying to have a review in every paper, especially if you don't know until after you read that there's nothing interesting in there
January 21, 2026 at 9:55 PM