Ora Tor
@splitrailfence.bsky.social
1.7K followers 980 following 8.7K posts
Civil War historian. Wide Awake Progressive. Retired from social studies, financial analysis, and small business. Traveled over 50k US miles for my research. Nature knows best and intends no ill will.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Ora Tor
prchovanec.bsky.social
My problem is not that federal money is being either spent or cut, but that it is being spent or cut unconstitutionally.
Reposted by Ora Tor
prchovanec.bsky.social
It is Congress' power and responsibility to make those decisions either way (with the President, of course, exercising a veto when a bill is passed). But via DOGE, OMB, and other guises, that power is being hijacked and that responsibility abdicated.
Reposted by Ora Tor
royalpratt.bsky.social
Chicago federal court chief judge says she has not requested National Guard for courthouse
Reposted by Ora Tor
grudgie.bsky.social
Um - that makes no sense. Those hospitals would lose even more money.
atrupar.com
SCARBOROUGH: The Nebraska Rural Health Association says at least 6 rural hospitals would have to close bc of the big beautiful bill

FLOOD: Here's the deal: Some hospitals that are rural hospitals are going to eventually have to transition from being acute bed hospitals into being an ER model
Reposted by Ora Tor
owenjones.bsky.social
Woahhhhhh.

A poll that shows the Greens surging to 15% - and just 2 points behind the Labour party.
splitrailfence.bsky.social
Republican quandary: Newsom pulls a Michelle Obama, but Bob K Jr. did too, so what to do and how to feel? GOP needs a leader man to help them sort this out, I bet.
Reposted by Ora Tor
jeffroushwriting.bsky.social
As Banned Books Week continues, we revisit the US Supreme Court’s ruling in Board of Education, Island Trees Union Free School District v. Pico. While limited in precedential value, the case outlined important, enduring First Amendment principles. (Thread)
www.freedomforum.org/how-a-40-yea...
How a 40-Year-Old Supreme Court Ruling May Quash the Book Banning Wave
Some scholars and First Amendment advocates regard the 1982 decision as a win for students.
www.freedomforum.org
Reposted by Ora Tor
marcelias.bsky.social
Washington Post vs Democracy Docket.

Support independent, pro-democracy media by subscribing to Democracy Docket today. hubs.ly/Q03M8rql0
Reposted by Ora Tor
splitrailfence.bsky.social
On literacy and AI: "Nobody has ever studied the harmful effects of hammers on learning and concluded that teachers must all hit their students with hammers “responsibly.”"
An important thread ⤵️
tedmccormick.bsky.social
A striking thing about articles I’ve read claiming to “study the effects” of generative AI on student writing skills and consumption of information is that (1) they nearly always find the effects are negative and (2) most “conclusions” are still written assuming that we must use AI, for some reason.
Reposted by Ora Tor
tedmccormick.bsky.social
Imagine studying a technology whose presence in the classroom is so detrimental to the development of writing and research skills (including even the will to know the sources behind claims!) that mitigating its effects becomes a central goal of course design, and concluding with tips on adopting it.
Reposted by Ora Tor
tedmccormick.bsky.social
It is also remarkable how far what is essentially advertising copy has penetrated into ostensibly neutral, scholarly contextualizations even of critical studies — rote invocations of AI’s “power,” “potential,” and ubiquity, untethered to any specific sources or data, are just background noise now.
Reposted by Ora Tor
tedmccormick.bsky.social
It is hard not to connect these observable features of “academic” work on AI to the collapse of faculty governance in universities. Even academics in the midst of *doing* academic work *about* their academic work write as if they have no real choices about the material context in which it occurs.
Reposted by Ora Tor
tedmccormick.bsky.social
Generative AI, in both form and content, and whether looked on favourably or critically, seems to embody a collective hopelessness about the prospect of human learning and creativity, if not human knowledge altogether. It’s as if climate change had fans.
Reposted by Ora Tor
tedmccormick.bsky.social
This also indicates the essential dishonesty of saying “it’s just a tool.” A hammer is a tool. Nobody writes about the “inevitability” of hammers. Nobody has ever studied the harmful effects of hammers on learning and concluded that teachers must all hit their students with hammers “responsibly.”
splitrailfence.bsky.social
But I'm into the Hume thing. Thanks for posting a "nevermind" because I'm minding it!
Reposted by Ora Tor
bretdevereaux.bsky.social
A good example of why direct inflation adjustment of this sort is more deceptive than clarifying when applied over very long stretches of time where consumption patterns are very different.

Basic foods (bread/grain) probably devours a third of Cratchet's income, but not the modern worker's.
Reposted by Ora Tor
bretdevereaux.bsky.social
One way to think about the comparison is in a 'grain wage' - how wages translate to calories and what that means for standard of living.

Grain prices in Britain in 1843 (when A Christmas Carol was published) were around c. 6 shillings per bushel.

www.econ.ucdavis.edu/faculty/gcla...
www.econ.ucdavis.edu
Reposted by Ora Tor
bretdevereaux.bsky.social
Bob Cratchet's household - an adult male, an adult female, four children of varying ages - probably needs on the order of 11,000 calories per day, which is about 3.3kg of wheat; 23kg per week, 85% of a bushel.

So a third of Crachet's 15 shillings go to food at the cheapest option for food.
Reposted by Ora Tor
bretdevereaux.bsky.social
Let us compare a worker making just $8 an hour, working 40 hours a week. They make $320 a week, so we might compare how many calories a third of that value can buy to see if these two are similarly destitute.
Reposted by Ora Tor
bretdevereaux.bsky.social
Wheat-per-bushel prices wholesale vary, but over the last 20 years, between a $3-10 per bushel range, so a third of that minimum wage worker's paycheck ($106) is going to buy ~15 bushels a week (405kg, 1.35 million calories, 17 times what Cratchet is buying).

www.macrotrends.net/2534/wheat-p...
Wheat Prices (1959-2025)
Interactive chart of historical daily wheat prices back to 1975. The price shown is in U.S. Dollars per bushel.
www.macrotrends.net
Reposted by Ora Tor
bretdevereaux.bsky.social
(Worth noting: wheat prices in the USA are generally expressed as cents-to-bushel on charts, not dollars, because for a commodity traded in bulk, a movement of a few cents matters a lot. So when you see that the wheat price today is 507, that's not $507, that's $5.07 per bushel.)
Reposted by Ora Tor
bretdevereaux.bsky.social
The pressures of poverty on these two households are very different. Cratchet has to be sincerely worried about getting enough raw nutrition for his children (implied by Tiny Tim, probably suffering rickets); the minimum wage household is poor, but not the same extreme kind of poor.
Reposted by Ora Tor
bretdevereaux.bsky.social
And of course that's before we consider any of the impacts of income transfers, SNAP benefits and such for the minimum wage family.

By contrast, Cratchet's government in 1843 is not only not helping him feed his family, through the Corn Laws, they are actively *raising* the price of grain.