Well, that brought back memories I did not realize i still had. I don't care for that at all

(and that vote was 206-8-7)

Apologies if you already know. The usccb is in Baltimore for their big fall meeting electing a new president and also voting on multiple of these statements. Not that it isn't without newsworthiness but they also did a statement on trans healthcare (they are, er, against)

Did no one on bluesky ever work for someone who packed their schedule too full and occasionally would shoot off emails from his phone while between meetings to you? I have received some illegible emails (to be fair to my boss he was genial about some particularly egregious ones)

I don't think there is any good mechanism of this as process though. Like ultimately the solution has to be "the NYT as institution and as journalists have ethics" and...well

Fair. I am narrowing this *just* to the anti of liberal democracy

Hey, i think i own A TINY SHARE in the nyt. MY FIDUCIARY INTERESTS!!

Waitwaitwait.
It's publicly traded

I guess the nyt doesn't have shareholders

Is there any way that fiduciary duty can
A.) overule first amendment concerns in this particular case
B.) be tied to maintaining integrity and liberal democracy for long term shareholder interest

My radical view is that the story about the president being implicated in a notorious paedophile ring should be covered as an important story *in its own right*, and then secondarily any political consequences can be covered later

Gonna be honest, i legitimately don't understand some of these emails people are posting

I don't understand this email

"lol nothing matters" can be self-fulfilling in any case, so let's avoid doing that

Well, at least we have national unity

Happy birthday!

Very queer coded (complementary)

"even though you are right in loving your neighbor or recognizing selfishness, you did so through heresy and are therefore condemned to the pit" no, i reject this. This is not grace