Seems this reflects a general finding that significant advantages remain (in muscle mass, bone structure and density, VO2 max, as well as any height and reach advantage obviously), hence the suggested open/third category. There’s usually a middle way, or I like to think so…

Not my expertise but this is one of the papers on the specific sport pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC... Don’t know of other research but the proposal seems sound.

I’ve been only twice. The border police treatment entering from Canada 8 years or so ago was bad enough.

I mean... holy shit.

Psychology as a whole neglected complexity and systems thinking. Neither were taught on my degree and I only discovered after (through systems ergonomics/human factors).

I like this take on the question! I sort of took anaesthetists to be the more patient of the medics.

In that case I’ll go with neglect of custom.

Pressed send to early, this was 15’s question to me 😅

5/11 ⚠️ Notably, we found no evidence that physician associates add value in primary care or that anaesthetic associates contribute positively in anaesthetics. If you add cost of supervision, which the studies don’t, it’s very unlikely they are cost-effective