Refugee from Xitter
@stewie33.bsky.social
Politics, humor, cats, random acts of beauty, and sometimes auto racing. Anti-Gavin Trolls blocked (no big fan either but now's not the time for that!) . Reposts≠endorsement. NO DMs.
Reposted by Refugee from Xitter
3/liability is an invitation to cheat.
All that said, the CLEAR & PRESENT Danger is Roberts and Alito have been anti-voting from birth. Alito claimed he was very upset in HS when Baker v Carr (one person, one vote) was decided. In HS he thought some ppls’ votes should count more than others.
All that said, the CLEAR & PRESENT Danger is Roberts and Alito have been anti-voting from birth. Alito claimed he was very upset in HS when Baker v Carr (one person, one vote) was decided. In HS he thought some ppls’ votes should count more than others.
February 15, 2026 at 8:44 PM
3/liability is an invitation to cheat.
All that said, the CLEAR & PRESENT Danger is Roberts and Alito have been anti-voting from birth. Alito claimed he was very upset in HS when Baker v Carr (one person, one vote) was decided. In HS he thought some ppls’ votes should count more than others.
All that said, the CLEAR & PRESENT Danger is Roberts and Alito have been anti-voting from birth. Alito claimed he was very upset in HS when Baker v Carr (one person, one vote) was decided. In HS he thought some ppls’ votes should count more than others.
Reposted by Refugee from Xitter
2/drawn, and serves no state interest other than imaginary as there is virtually no identity fraud or noncitizens voting in federal elections, hence the burdens placed are unconst.
Moreover, turning over voting information to the federal govt is overreach.
Exempting those who purge voter rolls from
Moreover, turning over voting information to the federal govt is overreach.
Exempting those who purge voter rolls from
February 15, 2026 at 8:44 PM
2/drawn, and serves no state interest other than imaginary as there is virtually no identity fraud or noncitizens voting in federal elections, hence the burdens placed are unconst.
Moreover, turning over voting information to the federal govt is overreach.
Exempting those who purge voter rolls from
Moreover, turning over voting information to the federal govt is overreach.
Exempting those who purge voter rolls from
Reposted by Refugee from Xitter
And unconstitutional on many other grounds such as: the only burdens allowed to be placed on basic rts (all the rts to vote in the Const and Amendments, and Speech which voting certainly is, the voice of the people) must be:
a-narrowly drawn; and
b-serve a compelling state interest.
This is broadly
a-narrowly drawn; and
b-serve a compelling state interest.
This is broadly
February 15, 2026 at 8:44 PM
And unconstitutional on many other grounds such as: the only burdens allowed to be placed on basic rts (all the rts to vote in the Const and Amendments, and Speech which voting certainly is, the voice of the people) must be:
a-narrowly drawn; and
b-serve a compelling state interest.
This is broadly
a-narrowly drawn; and
b-serve a compelling state interest.
This is broadly
Reposted by Refugee from Xitter
Reposted by Refugee from Xitter
