Like yeah you should return your shopping cart but I think we can all agree that this type of language is pretty gross

Neither chicken nor egg came first, because those are conceptual categories invented by human beings. MAN came first.

Then it’s a good year—except for the horrors.

I don’t think the real art looked like that. It was probably similar to that, but I’m willing to bet that most (or at least a lot of) people would be able to tell the difference.

I don’t think I was denigrating the image based on aesthetic value, but I do think you can tell that it was AI-generated. Yes, text-to-image models are trained on real, human artworks, but that doesn’t mean it can replicate them perfectly.

Very good! I understand that these things can happen, but I hope they take more care to avoid them in the future

Sure, but what I mean is that the image is obviously AI-generated. Whether it was labeled as such doesn’t matter because you can tell from just looking at it.

That said, I do think it’s shitty of shutterstock to not label the slop more clearly.

Do they not have eyes?

Not sure if it’s a problem on my end but the sound cuts off at the beginning of “decadence”

I would probably check myself into some sort of institution actually