What a dumb comment 'Brian'

"Wretched party" because one Rep., who wouldn't even put their name on the record (because they'd be thrown out of the party), is a closet neo-con.

Yep.

Names should be on those quotes or they shouldn't be published.

Utterly devoid of value without a source and pure cowardice.

If you're not kicking the BlueSky bee's nest on at least a bi-weekly basis are you even really posting at all on here?

The far-left gangs just rove around looking for those whose ideas don't conform entitely to the most wild far-left panic narrative of the moment.

Truthout is indeed clown tier, I agree.

Denying reality? Dude were you in a coma and then educated on what happened by a half-baked AI?

Harris was put in an insanely challenging position a mere 100 days before the election and polling did not have Biden winning so this 'layup' assertion is pure fantasy.

Yes, much too complicated, how sharp of you to notice.

5/7 on the list there are abjectly right-wing outlets and none "dominate" individually or collectively.

The existence of MSNOW, DemocracyNow, MediaMatters, ProPublica, Vox, Current Affairs, and BlueSky isn't left-wing domination either.

I don't think any of the quoted examples are evidence of evil, lying, or fraud but he does appear to have an awful case of self-defeating leftist.

The list is filled with organizations I'd already associate with "conservative media".

That a Republican owns OANN and Fox and Newsmaxx would surprise exactly zero people.

Whoever made that info graphic is less than sharp.

Half of those organizations are irrelevant.

For any list of 7 media organizations to make the point they are trying to make all 7 on the list would have to be from the top 10 or so list of media organizations by size/reach/subscribers/etc.

Seems well into the pet-peeve category of complaints.

Looks to be a fake tweet.

My point is that how foolproof it is weighs on whether the tool actually saves you time.

CTRL+F works 100% reliably on typed text; I'm not going to skim a doc that I could search. I trust the tool is close to flawless.

AI on the other hand produces enough flaws that human review is still necessary

This is all assuming that the OCR / page reading capabilities are more or less flawless of course.

It's improved from classic and basic OCR but I'd not hang my hat on it.

Nope, no mentions of XYZ found because it couldn't read some handwriting on page 334 or the scan was a bit smushed on page 758.

I think you misunderstand what this account is doing here.

You're the caricature the Right is desperate to find and highlight.

You made zero cogent arguments or points. Mute is where you belong.

In a party line vote she managed to get some crossovers to compensate. No small thing.

These are legislators and politicians, not magicians.

She can't outweigh the pardon Cuellar just got from Trump ( he was one of the three Dem crossovers ) and should have been chased out of the House already.