After the first perspective shift I thought we might be in for a relatively limited conclusion but I didn't think the first act basically covered the full plot.
@zohrankmamdani is a deeply thoughtful human being and we think he would make the best NYC mayor imaginable. We feel this as New Yorkers, as Jews and as human beings who are desperate for kindness, compassion and empathy to be represented in our politics.
I'd even have been less bothered by the post if it were explicitly calling me annoying than calling any group of people annoying based on their race and gender.
That's categorically a different thing & whether it applies to me or not doesn't change that.
People can and will advocate for themselves however they prefer.
You won't get a blank check on any sort of advocacy from the public.
From Marijuana legalization, to abortion, to gay rights, to Healthcare reform, etc. finding effective ways to advocate that will increase net support is critical.
It -is- me in this instance, but I'm fine with people calling me individually annoying but don't think blanket statements like that really have any place.
Even positive ones are expressions of racial bias. "Green women are pretty."
Racism is not exclusively systemic and it's wild that you think it is.
While there's as you mentioned plenty of examples of systemic racism, there's no shortage of interpersonal racism as well between individuals or groups smaller than these enormous systems and that extends to all.
Three times in the past two weeks, editorials at the 'Washington Post' failed to disclose that they focused on matters in which owner Jeff Bezos had a material interest.
