Yes, this is exactly the kind of nonsense one expects from pro Israel Schwartz media.

Privately, I’m sure she’d tell you her real thoughts.

It is deliberate. She is trying to maintain her cache as the foremost impartial constitutional affairs commentator and avoid political comment. This is as outspoken as you’ll get from her, and to be fair, she’s usually more reserved and not nearly this critical.

Have you read the laws? Would you mind explaining to me how they do that? My understanding differs rather substantially from yours.

What about them is sensible Liam

Agree. I guess I think it’s just comical to suggest ON, a sectarian, populist, disorganised, radical right wing party, is more leftist than the greens as OP suggested

Of course cutting GST is left wing, however you cannot analyse just one aspect of ON’s incoherent taxation platform

I don’t think any single one of those counts as “left wing”. Populist yes but left wing?

Can you name a single policy of ON that’s more “left” of the greens…?

This means the banning power can be used when hateful conduct is directed at Judaism but not at Islam, Hinduism, Christianity or any other religion. It also does not apply to hateful conduct against the LGBTIQ+ community, women or people with disability. It deliberately carves them out.

This doesn’t say what the OP says. Just that advocating genocide is better dealt with the genocide offences in the criminal code.

No it doesn’t. It doesn’t specifically exclude “advocating genocide”. What section says that in the exposure Bill? What?

It’s simply wonderful to breathe outside without any form of mask on, you should try it. Also you’re absolutely mental and need urgent psychiatric care for your irrational fear of Covid and your agoraphobia

You have profound and extreme mental illness

Hahahahahahahahaha