Thekla Morgenroth
@theklamorgenroth.bsky.social
2.2K followers 370 following 83 posts
Assistant professor of social psychology at Purdue. Obsessed with my cat Kartoffel. Recruiting a grad student for Fall 2026!
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Pinned
theklamorgenroth.bsky.social
I'll be recruiting a grad student to join the UNICORN lab for Fall 2026! If you know any magical students interested in gender/sex, LGBTQ+ issues, intergroup relations, stereotyping & prejudice, social cognition, feminism, issues of bodily autonomy, or anything else I do, please send them my way!
a cartoon unicorn with a rainbow mane is dancing on a dance floor
ALT: a cartoon unicorn with a rainbow mane is dancing on a dance floor
media.tenor.com
theklamorgenroth.bsky.social
New paper! "Reviewing Research on Transgender and Nonbinary People in Social Psychology: Insights and Future Research Directions" With the magical @kirameans.bsky.social onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/...
Reposted by Thekla Morgenroth
chrbuettner.bsky.social
📣 Call for unpublished studies on discrimination of bisexual people!

⬇️ Please see the full call below

We are very grateful for all contributions!

#SocialPsych #PsychSciSky
theklamorgenroth.bsky.social
Please consider participating in our research! We're looking for social psychologists (broadly defined) who study gender (broadly defined). Research is (unfortunately) limited to people from/living in US, Canada, Australia, European Economic Area, and UK.
kirameans.bsky.social
Are you a social psychologist who studies gender? We invite you to complete a 15-minute voluntary and anonymous survey about your experiences with publishing your research. 1/x
Reposted by Thekla Morgenroth
jinxungoh.bsky.social
#Psychjobs
My former institution Colby College is hiring a tenure track in intergroup relations, broadly defined & open to many psych areas (not just social). This is my replacement line. I truly enjoyed my time at Colby and it's a great dept! Happy to answer Qs if I can.
apply.interfolio.com/172552
Apply - Interfolio {{$ctrl.$state.data.pageTitle}} - Apply - Interfolio
apply.interfolio.com
theklamorgenroth.bsky.social
and feel free to chat to my current grad students @kirameans.bsky.social and Heejoo Chung (not on here) to find out what it's like to work with me.
theklamorgenroth.bsky.social
I'll be recruiting a grad student to join the UNICORN lab for Fall 2026! If you know any magical students interested in gender/sex, LGBTQ+ issues, intergroup relations, stereotyping & prejudice, social cognition, feminism, issues of bodily autonomy, or anything else I do, please send them my way!
a cartoon unicorn with a rainbow mane is dancing on a dance floor
ALT: a cartoon unicorn with a rainbow mane is dancing on a dance floor
media.tenor.com
theklamorgenroth.bsky.social
Check out our new pre-print in which we argue something that might be obvious but doesn't seem to be obvious to everyone: Large Language Models (such as ChatGPT) do not simulate human psychology.
Reposted by Thekla Morgenroth
theklamorgenroth.bsky.social
You can email me at tmorgenr(at)purdue.edu
theklamorgenroth.bsky.social
P.S.: Am I a real social psychologist now that I've published in JPSP? 😆
theklamorgenroth.bsky.social
18/18 Finally: All our materials and data are openly available: osf.io/xkbgh/. Studies 1 and 2a were not preregistered. For all remaining studies, we preregistered hypotheses, sample size, exclusion criteria, measures, and analytic strategy, and report deviations from the preregistrations.
Materials and data
Hosted on the Open Science Framework
osf.io
theklamorgenroth.bsky.social
17/n Our studies emphasize how such sex/gender-dependent granting of rights might be justified and psychologically and societally sustained. We hope that our work does not remain the last to shed psychological light on this topic!
theklamorgenroth.bsky.social
16/ Many questions are of course still open and there's a bunch of limitations - but we hope that this is a useful contribution to the literature. Bodily autonomy – a core value in philosophy and human rights – seems to be granted less to women than to men across several domains.
theklamorgenroth.bsky.social
14/n Everyone thought harm-based arguments were the most convincing, regardless of condition. But, in line with our predictions, the relative convincingness of harm (compared to fairness/purity) was increased when talking to the political outgroup. (figure is for Republican participants)
theklamorgenroth.bsky.social
13/n ... the most convincing arguments for their position (pro or anti decriminalization of sex work). Importantly, we told them to either convince a group of fellow Republicans/Democrats, a group of the political outgroup, or a mixed group.
theklamorgenroth.bsky.social
12/n So in the remaining studies, we examined whether people are more likely to use harm-based arguments when talking to a value-based outgroup member. We recruited Democrats who supported the decriminalization of sex work and Republicans that opposed it. We asked them to select...
theklamorgenroth.bsky.social
11/n But why does harm make such a useful strategic tool? We argue that people know that it is the "common ground" they share with outgroups. E.g. someone opposing sex work bc of religious beliefs likely knows that arguments based on religion will not be convincing to non-religious people.
theklamorgenroth.bsky.social
10/n ... I care more about other stuff anyway." So we gave opponents and supporters information either in line or contradicting their views. As expected, people claimed harm was a less important reason for their views when the information was in opposition to their pre-existing views:
theklamorgenroth.bsky.social
9/n ... claims that the decriminalization of sex work increases or decreases harm shouldn't affect the stated importance of harm. But if people use harm strategically, then giving them information that contradicts their views may make them go "actually, harm is not that important to me. ...
theklamorgenroth.bsky.social
8/n Ok, so people don't seem to be accurate in their perceptions of what predicts their views, but we also wanted to show that people use harm _strategically_, i.e. when it benefits them in some way. So in Study 3, we reasoned that if people truly care about harm, giving them information that...
theklamorgenroth.bsky.social
7/n So everyone says harm matters. But does it really? When we measure importance of harm (& other foundations), it doesn't predict opposition. Only importance of fairness and purity are predictive.
theklamorgenroth.bsky.social
6/n In Study 2, we replicated these patterns when asking people directly about harm (& other foundations) and found similar patterns for another topic related to women's bodily autonomy (abortion).