Reviewers and critics shouldn't have to bow down to their audience if their review is different from the general consensus. If it's different from their opinion, that's fine. Makes their voice more unique than anything. You shouldn't get so attached to what critics say.

I definitely forgot to note that it’s not the original The Village People group, but rather another group from my knowledge.

Update: My grandma finally received SNAP benefits :)

However, don’t you dare scold those who are just simply expressing a sigh of relief.

It’s usually cishet white people who say things like this and it’s genuinely exhausting. You don’t see the rest of us scolding you for mourning these very people.

I’m cishet and I’m half white myself, but I’m not mourning these people, but I also won’t straight up mock them.

The people scolding those who aren’t mourning people like Charlie Kirk and Dick Cheney are the same people who expect marginalized people to “suck it up”, or to have some resilience, or to “be the bigger person”. You all truly don’t understand why a lot of us don’t want to mourn these people.

Happy birthday! :) 🎉🎈

—the fandom, but here’s one example of a character’s overall popularity: Matt Medic, who seems to have little depth and has only appeared in 5 episodes, seems to be more popular in the fandom than, let’s say Al Pine, who has appeared in 7 episodes and has some more character depth than Matt.

- Aiden Assist, a physically disabled Rescue Hero, only made 1 appearance in season 3 and that was it. I really wish that the show utilized him more to better represent disabled people, especially in the workforce and first responders.
- This isn’t criticism of the show itself, but rather—