Sir, I don’t dispute that this is evidence of some change, but he did sing Green Acres dressed in overalls and a straw hat with Megan Mullally at the 2005 Emmys. Is that different in context than whatever *gesticulating wildly* this is?

The state secrets doctrine is bogus in its current form and Justice Gorsuch’s dissent in United States v. Zubaydah should be required reading. A rare Gorsuch W.

Which if true (it’s not) begs the question: why is the president’s skin so thin that shaking hands with another causes his skin to tear apart like tissue paper into open ulcers?

I don’t have high hopes for my home state and I take this with a grain of salt considering the lunatics there bullied and threatened Acton out of her public health job during covid for doing a responsible job, but whoa.

I can’t see how the polling gets any better for Vivek than statistical tie.

my god what is Roger’s espresso maker? I must have it

No, you can taste the civil war era in every Necco wafer, which makes it an S-tier candy.

Convinced these people also have no clue what bonds are.

No kidding, but that’s not the point I’m making.

Unless Sauer is implicitly saying Trump in this case can be held accountable under this rationale because Trump intends to run, illegally, again.

The Constitution sets out rules of the game regardless of how popular an action a president or Congress takes might be. Popular will doesn’t overrule constitutional guardrails no matter how big, or in this case small, an electoral victory is. Sauer as always is making an a-constitutional argument.

And quite frankly that argument in itself doesn’t hold water anyway! Most are held accountable by running for reelection once. The logical endpoint of this argument is that a lame duck president in their second term can do whatever they want since there are no more elections.