It seems now the Judicial Office will make no further embarrassing edits to Peggie/ NHS Fife judgment and will just leave to appeal.
Leaving the other fake quote which had the same goal of shoehorning in a "hierarchy of rights" concept leaves it all very tawdry. www.thecourier.co.uk/fp/politics/...

So if Judge Kemp thought fixing one fake quote would be enough then he may have another thing coming.
Telegraph is now citing the Lee v Ashers fake quote still being left in the judgment.
There can be no excuse for this.

The Scots Judiciary authority is crumbling in real time

archive.ph/Sw4SR

Amazingly they've just reissued the *whole* judgment but have ONLY modified the Forstater quote but it STILL has the undeniably fabricated quotes from Lee v Ashers and the FWS Supreme Court!
This is actually crazy now. They'll have to do this again assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/693ac2...

🚨So, Judicial Office admits the Peggie decision needs amending!
Article only mentions the Forstater fake quote, not the Asher's one, nor the more substantial fabricated SC quote.
Surely @naomicunningham.bsky.social should get an extra week added to respond now? www.thecourier.co.uk/fp/news/5391...

Michael Foran, Oxford Professor of Law, about this:

"Media is now reporting the possibility that several of the quotes from caselaw in Peggie v NHS Fife may be entirely fabricated. This is extraordinarily serious..."

Trans activism destroys everything it touches
www.thetimes.com/uk/scotland/...

"and that's the reason to remove ALL trans people from society"

Mate, I suggest you get an MRI scan for this hallucinatory state you suffer from

Context for the above found here x.com/jessesingal/...

WAFFLES

Do you think Alina Chan is a "crank" because of anything you worked out for yourself or because Michael told you?

This @usatoday.com article should be withdrawn.
It claims:
'Researchers whose findings suggest no clear competitive advantage for transgender women have reportedly been excluded from this group.'
There are no such findings.

You first try to delegitimise Alina Chan for writing in "right-wing media", then when she writes for the New York Times you dismiss her title as "head scratching" when it is a perfectly clear description of what she wrote.

Not very good advert for your book for people outside your epistemic bubble.