MSFT is so good at lots of things, and can hire the best people in the world. So I can't help but feel that the performative boomer techno-incompetence of LinkedIn is meant to be a meta-signal to more senior executives that Microsoft has a camp for them as well.
December 4, 2025 at 10:33 AM
MSFT is so good at lots of things, and can hire the best people in the world. So I can't help but feel that the performative boomer techno-incompetence of LinkedIn is meant to be a meta-signal to more senior executives that Microsoft has a camp for them as well.
"This is my crude pseudo-IMF Keynesian macro model. There are many like it but this one is mine. It is my best friend, it is my life. Without me, my model is useless. Without my model, my short term rate forecasts are useless."
December 3, 2025 at 4:26 PM
"This is my crude pseudo-IMF Keynesian macro model. There are many like it but this one is mine. It is my best friend, it is my life. Without me, my model is useless. Without my model, my short term rate forecasts are useless."
You can argue it's the key difference between China and Russia. Raiders make it hard for medium sized businesses to grow to big ones - decent mittelstand companies that pay their taxes are vulnerable to visits from law enforcement who take over and milk the cash. The Chinese mittelstand grows big.
December 3, 2025 at 3:16 PM
You can argue it's the key difference between China and Russia. Raiders make it hard for medium sized businesses to grow to big ones - decent mittelstand companies that pay their taxes are vulnerable to visits from law enforcement who take over and milk the cash. The Chinese mittelstand grows big.
But for the purposes of a general discussion, you could use EBITDA interest coverage without fear of criticism. Bear in mind that interest coverage is EBITDA divided by interest paid - and the 39% is interest paid divided by "EBITDA". 39% equates to interest coverage of 2.6 or so, which is not bad
December 3, 2025 at 3:14 PM
But for the purposes of a general discussion, you could use EBITDA interest coverage without fear of criticism. Bear in mind that interest coverage is EBITDA divided by interest paid - and the 39% is interest paid divided by "EBITDA". 39% equates to interest coverage of 2.6 or so, which is not bad
Another wrinkle here is that if they are adding back depreciation, this tends to be lower in Russian companies, because the tax service is quite tough on deductions like depreciation, plus for more established companies the book value is more art than science
December 3, 2025 at 3:10 PM
Another wrinkle here is that if they are adding back depreciation, this tends to be lower in Russian companies, because the tax service is quite tough on deductions like depreciation, plus for more established companies the book value is more art than science
Actually, they say that they are using EBITDA as a denominator, but the Russian term implies that they're doing Earnings (net income) plus interest and taxes "minus losses". Those losses could be depreciation, or they may be removing loss-making companies from the aggregate.
December 3, 2025 at 3:10 PM
Actually, they say that they are using EBITDA as a denominator, but the Russian term implies that they're doing Earnings (net income) plus interest and taxes "minus losses". Those losses could be depreciation, or they may be removing loss-making companies from the aggregate.
The number is certainly the highest it's been, but one caveat is that Russian companies tend to under-use debt. One reason is that debts can be re-sold to corporate raiders, so they're a source of risk. Also banks are very conservative in corporate lending
December 3, 2025 at 3:04 PM
The number is certainly the highest it's been, but one caveat is that Russian companies tend to under-use debt. One reason is that debts can be re-sold to corporate raiders, so they're a source of risk. Also banks are very conservative in corporate lending
Actually, I've looked at the source (slide 10): www.forecast.ru/_ARCHIVE/Pre... And they're using a Russian equivalent of interest coverage using a sort of EBIT as a denominator
Actually, I've looked at the source (slide 10): www.forecast.ru/_ARCHIVE/Pre... And they're using a Russian equivalent of interest coverage using a sort of EBIT as a denominator
Interest coverage is related to EBIT or EBIT, whereas the Russian accounting would be related to net income. But it would be a reasonable starting point
December 3, 2025 at 2:57 PM
Interest coverage is related to EBIT or EBIT, whereas the Russian accounting would be related to net income. But it would be a reasonable starting point