Thomas R. Carey🖖
@trc487.bsky.social
artist, historian, independent journalist, political junkie, writer of science fiction and archeoastronomy, retired - maybe an author someday if we survive 2025 - 2029.
Why redact Elon? We've seen this post before. I might even have a copy of it.
December 22, 2025 at 2:05 AM
Why redact Elon? We've seen this post before. I might even have a copy of it.
Do you have the one of the Trump pics in a desk drawer? I forgot to save a copy when I saw it yesterday, and now I can't find it.
December 22, 2025 at 1:53 AM
Do you have the one of the Trump pics in a desk drawer? I forgot to save a copy when I saw it yesterday, and now I can't find it.
Well, they really do look a lot alike, but Ingrid has green eyes and Pam has blue eyes. If you look closely, you can just make out that Pam's eyes are blue and Ingrid's are not blue.
December 21, 2025 at 10:22 PM
Well, they really do look a lot alike, but Ingrid has green eyes and Pam has blue eyes. If you look closely, you can just make out that Pam's eyes are blue and Ingrid's are not blue.
The pic I posted could have been any blond girl. You can't even see her face - just her hair. The pic is real. People are mashing it up with the fake pics out there. I never said the blond in the pic was Pam.
And a supposition is not by nature substantive. It's seeking opinions, not discussions.
And a supposition is not by nature substantive. It's seeking opinions, not discussions.
December 21, 2025 at 9:53 PM
The pic I posted could have been any blond girl. You can't even see her face - just her hair. The pic is real. People are mashing it up with the fake pics out there. I never said the blond in the pic was Pam.
And a supposition is not by nature substantive. It's seeking opinions, not discussions.
And a supposition is not by nature substantive. It's seeking opinions, not discussions.
And about 40% of you all focused totally on the fake pic and ignored the question - so far.
December 21, 2025 at 9:48 PM
And about 40% of you all focused totally on the fake pic and ignored the question - so far.
No worries. I was just curious as to how many people focus on the picture instead of the question.
Technically I could have used the picture because the blonde pictured in it is totally typical of the kind of girls Trump likes.
Anyway, so far it is about 40% to 60%
Technically I could have used the picture because the blonde pictured in it is totally typical of the kind of girls Trump likes.
Anyway, so far it is about 40% to 60%
December 21, 2025 at 9:47 PM
No worries. I was just curious as to how many people focus on the picture instead of the question.
Technically I could have used the picture because the blonde pictured in it is totally typical of the kind of girls Trump likes.
Anyway, so far it is about 40% to 60%
Technically I could have used the picture because the blonde pictured in it is totally typical of the kind of girls Trump likes.
Anyway, so far it is about 40% to 60%
I looked up the color of their eyes, and Ingrid has green eyes while Pam has blue eyes. If you look closely at the images, it appears to be green eyes and blue eyes.
December 21, 2025 at 9:41 PM
I looked up the color of their eyes, and Ingrid has green eyes while Pam has blue eyes. If you look closely at the images, it appears to be green eyes and blue eyes.
I never said that was Pam and not Ingrid. People assume too much too quickly in this charged atmosphere.
And ironically, the first time I played politics here on Bluesky, I got a lot of clicks when beforehand when I just posted the news as it happens, I'd get a few clicks here and there.
My bad.
And ironically, the first time I played politics here on Bluesky, I got a lot of clicks when beforehand when I just posted the news as it happens, I'd get a few clicks here and there.
My bad.
December 21, 2025 at 9:32 PM
I never said that was Pam and not Ingrid. People assume too much too quickly in this charged atmosphere.
And ironically, the first time I played politics here on Bluesky, I got a lot of clicks when beforehand when I just posted the news as it happens, I'd get a few clicks here and there.
My bad.
And ironically, the first time I played politics here on Bluesky, I got a lot of clicks when beforehand when I just posted the news as it happens, I'd get a few clicks here and there.
My bad.
I never said that was Pam and not Ingrid.
December 21, 2025 at 9:29 PM
I never said that was Pam and not Ingrid.
I never said that was Pam and not Ingrid.
December 21, 2025 at 9:27 PM
I never said that was Pam and not Ingrid.
As you noted, I did in fact say it was Ingrid. How is that disinformation?
December 21, 2025 at 9:27 PM
As you noted, I did in fact say it was Ingrid. How is that disinformation?
I never said that was Pam and not Ingrid.
December 21, 2025 at 9:26 PM
I never said that was Pam and not Ingrid.
It's just a supposition, and I never said that was Pam and not Ingrid in the picture. Call it a political ploy if you want, but I agree, all political science is pseudo-science.
Although I do find the megalithic construction all over the world 1000s of years ago to be puzzling to say the least.
Although I do find the megalithic construction all over the world 1000s of years ago to be puzzling to say the least.
December 21, 2025 at 9:25 PM
It's just a supposition, and I never said that was Pam and not Ingrid in the picture. Call it a political ploy if you want, but I agree, all political science is pseudo-science.
Although I do find the megalithic construction all over the world 1000s of years ago to be puzzling to say the least.
Although I do find the megalithic construction all over the world 1000s of years ago to be puzzling to say the least.
It's misdirection.
A big percentage of the responses here focused on the fake pic and not the supposition about why Bondi is the head of a massive cover-up. People jump on the fake pic to misdirect away from the issue. A lot more don't because they know the pic is not the real or important issue.
A big percentage of the responses here focused on the fake pic and not the supposition about why Bondi is the head of a massive cover-up. People jump on the fake pic to misdirect away from the issue. A lot more don't because they know the pic is not the real or important issue.
December 21, 2025 at 9:14 PM
It's misdirection.
A big percentage of the responses here focused on the fake pic and not the supposition about why Bondi is the head of a massive cover-up. People jump on the fake pic to misdirect away from the issue. A lot more don't because they know the pic is not the real or important issue.
A big percentage of the responses here focused on the fake pic and not the supposition about why Bondi is the head of a massive cover-up. People jump on the fake pic to misdirect away from the issue. A lot more don't because they know the pic is not the real or important issue.
I'm hoping it happens before Christmas. People with the goods can prove Bondi and Blanche are crooked AF, and the best time to nail them is when you catch them in the act.
December 21, 2025 at 8:48 PM
I'm hoping it happens before Christmas. People with the goods can prove Bondi and Blanche are crooked AF, and the best time to nail them is when you catch them in the act.
Trying to clear this up is all well and good, and I applaud your need to stop fake news or pictures from being distributed, but all you might accomplish in light of our extremely biased media nowadays is to raise the question:
"Why is Ingrid standing up against Trump with Epstein behind them?"
"Why is Ingrid standing up against Trump with Epstein behind them?"
December 21, 2025 at 8:43 PM
Trying to clear this up is all well and good, and I applaud your need to stop fake news or pictures from being distributed, but all you might accomplish in light of our extremely biased media nowadays is to raise the question:
"Why is Ingrid standing up against Trump with Epstein behind them?"
"Why is Ingrid standing up against Trump with Epstein behind them?"