The Child Molester in Chief says the New York Times is a “threat to the National Security of our Nation” and a “TRUE ENEMY OF THE PEOPLE.” The same child molester that fought to keep Jack Smith's second final report secret.

www.tiktok.com/@ryansmalcol...

It's weird how Russia will consistently bankrupt themselves chasing after an adversary. Last time it was an attempt to keep up with the US. This time it's an attempt to keep up with the EU. What is the definition of insanity again?

Generally, this just further highlights how far the Republican Party has slipped into corruption.

You know, and we know that there are defined legal limits on what's considered a "security issue." Things like FOIA exist for a reason.

At the congressional dining hall: "Hey, what's in this sloppy joe?" "That's a food service security issue and I will not talk about it."

Is there a way to impeach both the President and Vice President...and House Speaker, and Senate Pro Temp, and Sec of State. How far would we have to dig down to find an actual competent executive? This is why we need proportional representation and a Vote of No Confidence for the rulling party.

As a past Information Security Officer I have redacted plenty of documents. These are not properly redacted documents. Outside of describing sensitive investigative methods, redactions would normally be limited to victim name, addresses, location, photograph, and contact information.

LOL, I'm a bit slow today - what was this .gif refering to?

I lived in several states over the years and I can mention that there are significant differences to how each viewed smoking or chewing. Salt Lake City Utah's public anti-smoking attitude was shockingly different than Winston-Salem North Carolina's "tobacco is my family business" attitude.

Okay, here's like, 20 min of my time to show how any graphic (in this case a hastilly made bullet talking paper) can communicate a more *impactful* condemnation of something than repeating the phrase "millions of Americans will see increased health insurance costs" during interviews.

I'm a progressive, but I blame Democrats for this. All I ever heard was "Expensive health insurance" to the point that it sounded like the rest of the bill was just peachy. They SUCK at communicating to different levels of the public.

It's like he envisions himself dictating this to his Minister of Propaganda. "Whaddya think of that, Goebbels? I still got it don't I?"

There's often a kernel of truth to every tale. Trump wins in 2024 and no one raises a single arguement. No one gives us justification for such an upset or assures us it was reviewed and found 100% valid. Then, all the law suits agains him and his cronies are dropped. What. the. hell?