Elliot Tucker-Drob
@tuckerdrob.bsky.social
1.7K followers 79 following 23 posts
http://www.lifespanlab.com/
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
tuckerdrob.bsky.social
Non-paywalled link to my commentary on @vw1234.bsky.social and colleagues new paper in @nature.com rdcu.be/eI2NG
Reposted by Elliot Tucker-Drob
tuckerdrob.bsky.social
A deep and thought-provoking lecture that is definitely worth watching all the way through.
ent3c.bsky.social
My Dobzhansky lecture at BGA: "Theodosius Dobzhansky and the Origins of Radical Behavior Genetics" is publicly available. I talk about the tensions introduced into the field at the difficult border between science using model organisms and human beings. Thanks to BGA for the opportunity.
Sat_208_Dobzhansky_Lecture
Dobzhansky Lecture by Eric Turkheimer
vimeo.com
tuckerdrob.bsky.social
Let’s not “memory hole” the Flynn Effect, whereby objective cognitive measures show large mean cohort trends that are not plausibly reflective of any sort of general aspect of intelligence, but the individual correlates are largely invariant across generations.
tuckerdrob.bsky.social
But what is messy? What is late? Still subject to frame of reference.
tuckerdrob.bsky.social
Perhaps not peer comparison but shifting frame-of-reference, concept of normative or ideal, use of language… what @michelnivard.bsky.social likens to a vowel shift. Not necessarily the case, but important to consider, rather than trusting mean trends in self-report as veridical without question.
tuckerdrob.bsky.social
The interpretation is that the charter schools increase conscientiousness, self control, & grit... but also make students more self-critical with respect to those skills (perhaps they are cured of a Dunning-Krueger effect), such that self reports of those skills go down while the skills improve. 5/5
tuckerdrob.bsky.social
they may be misleading when comparing across cultures, cohorts, or possibly developmental periods due to different ways that people interpret the questions and use the likert scales, reference bias, etc... 3/
tuckerdrob.bsky.social
Unfortunately, "objective" observation- and task-based methods for measuring personality have much weaker construct validity and criterion validity. While self-reports are a great way to measure individual differences in personality among people matched on culture and context... 2/
tuckerdrob.bsky.social
A few related conversations have been converging on the question of when various trends and observations with respect to personality are genuine. This is a complex issue without a simple answer... A key issue is that personality is best measured using self- or informant ratings... 1/
michelnivard.bsky.social
While I am not entirely convinced this is “real” and not some psychometric equivalent of a vowel shift (and PRS could help find out a bit I think) this it is relevant:
tuckerdrob.bsky.social
The twin/family studies were not clear whether it was dominance vs. epistasis vs. some other sort of nonadditivity. Dominance was just the easiest to model. We can now estimate dominance SNP h2 but can’t obtain an estimate of epistatic SNP h2. Assimilation/contrast effects may also be at play.
tuckerdrob.bsky.social
To close the loop on this, this is what we wrote in the review (originally posted on the other platform).
Reposted by Elliot Tucker-Drob
Reposted by Elliot Tucker-Drob
laraffington.bsky.social
Humbled to receive the BGA's early career award ☺️ Thank you to my brilliant team #MPRGBiosocial, the @maxplanck.de for investing in early career researchers, @mpib-berlin.bsky.social for the excellent environment, and my many mentors incl @kph3k.bsky.social @tuckerdrob.bsky.social #ScienceTeamSport
behaviorgenetic.bsky.social
🏆 @laraffington.bsky.social‬ won the early career award, and Paul Liechtenstein won the Dobzhansky award
tuckerdrob.bsky.social
Omg 😂. Well played @michelnivard.bsky.social
michelnivard.bsky.social
O, right I promissed JUICE! Not everyone believes in this work, one of the "haters" was very early... In fact @ent3c.bsky.social practically leant over this papers' crib and said: "well that's not going to be a looker."... Someone just as petty as me, but far more organized, kept the receipts 👇
Reposted by Elliot Tucker-Drob
michelnivard.bsky.social
O, right I promissed JUICE! Not everyone believes in this work, one of the "haters" was very early... In fact @ent3c.bsky.social practically leant over this papers' crib and said: "well that's not going to be a looker."... Someone just as petty as me, but far more organized, kept the receipts 👇
Reposted by Elliot Tucker-Drob
michelnivard.bsky.social
You will have seen this post by @tedmond.bsky.social‬ on our new GWAS of Personality. He says you should read the paper (you should), I want to write a thread to entice you. Because social media has shredded your attention as it has mine, I promise there is JUICE & BEEF in this thread!
tedmond.bsky.social
Extremely excited to share the first effort of the Revived Genomics of Personality Consortium: A highly-powered, comprehensive GWAS of the Big Five personality traits in 1.14 million participants from 46 cohorts. www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...
Reposted by Elliot Tucker-Drob
hfsunde.bsky.social
Probably the most important paper in personality psych this decade just dropped. 👀 Interesting genetic correlations between other traits (the #1 reason for GWASs on social traits IMO), and evidence of weak but non-zero assortative mating on personality.
tedmond.bsky.social
Extremely excited to share the first effort of the Revived Genomics of Personality Consortium: A highly-powered, comprehensive GWAS of the Big Five personality traits in 1.14 million participants from 46 cohorts. www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...
Reposted by Elliot Tucker-Drob
michelnivard.bsky.social
🔥🔥🔥 2 years of our lives right there (extremely proud of everyone, I’ll write a thread later)
tedmond.bsky.social
Extremely excited to share the first effort of the Revived Genomics of Personality Consortium: A highly-powered, comprehensive GWAS of the Big Five personality traits in 1.14 million participants from 46 cohorts. www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...
Reposted by Elliot Tucker-Drob
tedmond.bsky.social
Extremely excited to share the first effort of the Revived Genomics of Personality Consortium: A highly-powered, comprehensive GWAS of the Big Five personality traits in 1.14 million participants from 46 cohorts. www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1...
Reposted by Elliot Tucker-Drob
aysuo.bsky.social
PGI Repository v2.0 preprint out! A 🧵 on the main results and updates @robel-alemu.bsky.social @paturley.bsky.social @alextisyoung.bsky.social
biorxivpreprint.bsky.social
An Updated Polygenic Index Repository: Expanded Phenotypes, New Cohorts, and Improved Causal Inference https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2025.05.14.653986v1
Reposted by Elliot Tucker-Drob
michelnivard.bsky.social
Super brief video intro-ing the alpha version(!!) of an free studyguide/book in sequence models and deeplearning in/for genomics.
Alpha version of my new book on ML in Genomics is online!
YouTube video by Michel's Science Speedrun
www.youtube.com