Reposted by Ulrich Hansen
2/10
Die Initiative World Weather Attribution analysierte 157 Extremereignisse allein 2025.
Ergebnis:
17 von 22 untersuchten Katastrophen wurden durch den Klimawandel wahrscheinlicher oder extremer.
Kein Alarmismus.
Einfache Statistik.
Die Initiative World Weather Attribution analysierte 157 Extremereignisse allein 2025.
Ergebnis:
17 von 22 untersuchten Katastrophen wurden durch den Klimawandel wahrscheinlicher oder extremer.
Kein Alarmismus.
Einfache Statistik.
December 31, 2025 at 8:14 PM
2/10
Die Initiative World Weather Attribution analysierte 157 Extremereignisse allein 2025.
Ergebnis:
17 von 22 untersuchten Katastrophen wurden durch den Klimawandel wahrscheinlicher oder extremer.
Kein Alarmismus.
Einfache Statistik.
Die Initiative World Weather Attribution analysierte 157 Extremereignisse allein 2025.
Ergebnis:
17 von 22 untersuchten Katastrophen wurden durch den Klimawandel wahrscheinlicher oder extremer.
Kein Alarmismus.
Einfache Statistik.
Reposted by Ulrich Hansen
Register and find the upcoming schedule of briefings at: www.climatecentral.org/climate-brie...
The Monthly Climate Brief | Climate Central
Insights for informed decisions.
www.climatecentral.org
January 22, 2026 at 7:26 PM
Register and find the upcoming schedule of briefings at: www.climatecentral.org/climate-brie...
Reposted by Ulrich Hansen
In 2008, the Coen Brothers (yes, Joel and Ethan) directed this ad, mocking the same kind of coal industry bullsh*t that Trump has gifted us with again... in 2026.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=W-_U...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=W-_U...
January 22, 2026 at 7:33 PM
In 2008, the Coen Brothers (yes, Joel and Ethan) directed this ad, mocking the same kind of coal industry bullsh*t that Trump has gifted us with again... in 2026.
www.youtube.com/watch?v=W-_U...
www.youtube.com/watch?v=W-_U...
Reposted by Ulrich Hansen
You should read Malm and Carton's Overshoot. Its account of the assets that would be stranded in the resolution of the climate crisis (and the reverberations of that stranding) explains so much about elite behavior in our current conjecture.
This is a TL/DR: lareviewofbooks.org/article/the-...
This is a TL/DR: lareviewofbooks.org/article/the-...
The Point, However, Is to Change It | Los Angeles Review of Books
In advance of Andreas Malm and Wim Carton’s forthcoming book “The Long Heat: Climate Politics When It’s Too Late,” Genevieve Guenther revisits the authors’ 2024 title “Overshoot: How the World Surrend...
lareviewofbooks.org
January 18, 2026 at 9:56 PM
You should read Malm and Carton's Overshoot. Its account of the assets that would be stranded in the resolution of the climate crisis (and the reverberations of that stranding) explains so much about elite behavior in our current conjecture.
This is a TL/DR: lareviewofbooks.org/article/the-...
This is a TL/DR: lareviewofbooks.org/article/the-...
Reposted by Ulrich Hansen
"Die Stiftung habe sich von einer unauffälligen Organisation zu einem „Kampforgan“ entwickelt, sagen Politiker aus hohen saarländischen SPD- und CDU-Kreisen zu CORRECTIV." Die Stiftung lade nun öfter Rechtskonservative & Klimawandel-Leugner ein...
correctiv.org/aktuelles/tr...
correctiv.org/aktuelles/tr...
Geld, Macht, Kampagnen: Der lange Arm von Team Trump
Wie millionenschwere Stiftungen und mächtige Lobbyisten versuchen, Trumps Agenda nach Europa zu bringen und die CDU für sich einzunehmen.
correctiv.org
January 17, 2026 at 1:37 PM
"Die Stiftung habe sich von einer unauffälligen Organisation zu einem „Kampforgan“ entwickelt, sagen Politiker aus hohen saarländischen SPD- und CDU-Kreisen zu CORRECTIV." Die Stiftung lade nun öfter Rechtskonservative & Klimawandel-Leugner ein...
correctiv.org/aktuelles/tr...
correctiv.org/aktuelles/tr...
Reposted by Ulrich Hansen
Which option do we choose - act or delay?
These are the 'warning' stripes highlighting global choices. Do we act rapidly and keep global temperatures below 2°C, or delay and end up in a 3°C world (or worse)?
These are the 'warning' stripes highlighting global choices. Do we act rapidly and keep global temperatures below 2°C, or delay and end up in a 3°C world (or worse)?
January 15, 2026 at 9:23 AM
Which option do we choose - act or delay?
These are the 'warning' stripes highlighting global choices. Do we act rapidly and keep global temperatures below 2°C, or delay and end up in a 3°C world (or worse)?
These are the 'warning' stripes highlighting global choices. Do we act rapidly and keep global temperatures below 2°C, or delay and end up in a 3°C world (or worse)?