The Applied Epistemology Project @ UNC
@unc-aep.bsky.social
350 followers 170 following 37 posts
Project at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill promoting outstanding scholarship that applies the questions and tools of epistemology to issues of pressing public concern. More information at aep.unc.edu.
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
unc-aep.bsky.social
Uh, make that 2026. Apologies!
unc-aep.bsky.social
We're delighted to announce the fourth (and final!) Applied Epistemology Project workshop, on Applied Epistemology in Times of Political Crisis, here at UNC on March 6-7, 2025. (1/3)
unc-aep.bsky.social
Interested in serving as a respondent? Apply by October 31st; instructions here: philevents.org/event/show/1... (3/3)
unc-aep.bsky.social
We're delighted to announce the fourth (and final!) Applied Epistemology Project workshop, on Applied Epistemology in Times of Political Crisis, here at UNC on March 6-7, 2025. (1/3)
unc-aep.bsky.social
AEP research getting out there! 👏👏👏
jeffgreene.bsky.social
Honored to co-present with Aditi Ahuja (her first academic conference presentation and she did great!) at the Humility in Inquiry conference. We presented data on factors affecting people’s willingness to defer to experts.
Me standing next to Aditi Ahuja who is speaking at a podium in front of an audience. There is a large projected slide behind us that says “Research Design.”
Reposted by The Applied Epistemology Project @ UNC
rbnmckenna.bsky.social
I wrote about epistemic trespassing and why it is bad for my Substack. Tl;dr: it is tempting to talk about it as a moral failing but I think it is often more helpful to view trespassing behaviour as a rational response to bad incentives.

rbnmckenna86.substack.com/p/what-is-wr...
What Is Wrong with Epistemic Trespassing?
Epistemic Trespassing and the Division of Cognitive Labour
rbnmckenna86.substack.com
unc-aep.bsky.social
New blog post! AEP postdoc Will Conner discusses recent news that Meta has been accused of cheating on AI benchmark tests, leading to a broader discussion of the value of such tests drawing on Thi Nguyen's work on gamification and value capture. Check it out!
aep.unc.edu/2025/07/09/g...
Gamifying Intelligence: The Evidential Value of AI Benchmark Tests | The Applied Epistemology Project @ UNC
aep.unc.edu
Reposted by The Applied Epistemology Project @ UNC
jeffgreene.bsky.social
Good Plain English pod featuring @holdenthorp.bsky.social. I appreciated Holden’s candor regarding scientists’ attempts to influence politics and when such attempts might edge into epistemic trespassing, which is an idea addressed in our recent paper (1/2) open.spotify.com/episode/4Pee...
Megapod: The Crisis in American Science
Plain English with Derek Thompson · Episode
open.spotify.com
unc-aep.bsky.social
Very excited to share our third "explainer video". (Refresher: these are ~5 min animations introducing applied epistemology concepts for a wide audience.) This one's on epist of free speech, featuring a script by Rob Simpson! Please share & consider using in teaching!
www.youtube.com/watch?v=hMgb...
[AEP Explainers] The Epistemology of Free Speech (with Robert Simpson)
YouTube video by PPE at UNC
www.youtube.com
unc-aep.bsky.social
But what about when an individual expert tells you something and you don't know whether it's the consensus or subject to expert disagreement? Should you defer then? In his new paper forthcoming in PPR, AEP Fellow Devin Lane argues that you generally shouldn't. Check it out:
philpapers.org/rec/LANSYD
Devin Lane, Should You Defer to Individual Experts? - PhilPapers
Should you defer to individual experts? That is, when a single expert – rather than a group of experts or even expert consensus – testifies that p, should you believe that ...
philpapers.org
unc-aep.bsky.social
Many (applied) epistemologists think that when you know that there's expert consensus about something, you should defer to the expert consensus. And many of them also think that when you know the experts disagree, you should suspend judgment. (1/2)
Devin Lane, Should You Defer to Individual Experts? - PhilPapers
Should you defer to individual experts? That is, when a single expert – rather than a group of experts or even expert consensus – testifies that p, should you believe that ...
philpapers.org
unc-aep.bsky.social
Reminder: tomorrow is the deadline to apply for this! It's a chance to get expert instruction in public writing on applied epistemology, feedback from peers, and to enjoy an in-person workshop here at UNC
unc-aep.bsky.social
Interested in writing applied epistemology for a public-facing audience? Apply to be part of our new working group! It'll meet four times over the summer, followed by a capstone in-person event here at UNC in September facilitated by Eleanor Gordon-Smith. Details here:
philevents.org/event/show/1...
Reposted by The Applied Epistemology Project @ UNC
annamariaaeder.bsky.social
🥁🎉It's time again! My colleague Thomas Grundmann is organising the Cologne Summer School in Philosophy. This year's star is @aworsnip.bsky.social (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill). 🎊📢
You can find more information on the following website: cssip.uni-koeln.de
Spread the word and repost!
unc-aep.bsky.social
Interested in writing applied epistemology for a public-facing audience? Apply to be part of our new working group! It'll meet four times over the summer, followed by a capstone in-person event here at UNC in September facilitated by Eleanor Gordon-Smith. Details here:
philevents.org/event/show/1...
unc-aep.bsky.social
Very excited to share our second "explainer video". (Refresher: these are ~5 min animations introducing applied epistemology concepts for a wide audience.) This one's on polarization, featuring a script by Kevin Dorst! Please share, consider using in teaching, etc!
www.youtube.com/watch?v=h9nd...
[AEP Explainers] Political Polarization (with Kevin Dorst)
YouTube video by PPE at UNC
www.youtube.com
unc-aep.bsky.social
Fascinating new post on our blog by Emily McWilliams, discussing the denial and undertreatment of women's pain in medical procedures through the lens of applied epistemological work on testimonial injustice, manufactured ignorance, and motivated reasoning:
aep.unc.edu/2025/03/17/t...
The Retrievals and the Routine: Systematic Erasure of Women’s Pain | The Applied Epistemology Project @ UNC
aep.unc.edu
Reposted by The Applied Epistemology Project @ UNC
sampratt99.bsky.social
New Paper in Philosophical Psychology:

Trust in experts is low. Why? How bad is it? And what should we do? To answer these questions, we reviewed philosophy (when *ought* we defer to the experts) and psychology (when *do* people defer to the experts).

Link in comments!
Reposted by The Applied Epistemology Project @ UNC
unc-aep.bsky.social
Check out this interdisciplinary review paper on deference to experts by a team of AEP Fellows (current and past)!
jeffgreene.bsky.social
Mistrust in experts is high. So, under what conditions should people defer to experts and when do they actually do so? We synthesized the philosophy and psychology literatures on deference to experts in this preprint, soon to be published in Philosophical Psychology. (1/2) https://buff.ly/3ERGzqq
unc-aep.bsky.social
Consider applying to be part of this summer school (aimed at researchers of all career stages) on applied epistemology featuring AEP Director @aworsnip.bsky.social!
aworsnip.bsky.social
I'm honored to be the guest lecturer at this year's Cologne Summer School in Philosophy, where I'll be delivering five lectures (plus a public lecture) on my current work in applied epistemology. (1/2)
cssip.uni-koeln.de
Cologne Summer School in Philosophy
cssip.uni-koeln.de
Reposted by The Applied Epistemology Project @ UNC
shannimcg.bsky.social
I’ve been studying this problem since 2015. Obviously the nature of this changed with the birth of X. It’s gone from over-indexed on the political nerds & activists to over-indexed on Nazis & fascists. It’s no good.
clarajeffery.bsky.social
a very real problem is how many politicians and household name MSM journos still get their news—and gauge public reaction—from Twitter.
Reposted by The Applied Epistemology Project @ UNC
michaelhannon.bsky.social
I started a Political Epistemology substack, and I decided to begin with an uncontroversial topic.

I currently have 3 followers, but I welcome more!
Social Identity and Epistemic Privilege
Is there an epistemic advantage to being oppressed?
open.substack.com