Robin McKenna
@rbnmckenna.bsky.social
1.1K followers 680 following 490 posts
Scottish philosopher at the University of Liverpool. Likes to do philosophy by reading about things that are more interesting than philosophy. Some sort of social epistemologist. https://robinmckenna.weebly.com/
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
Reposted by Robin McKenna
multiplicityct.bsky.social
We have nothing to worry about from AI's hyper-persuasiveness...as long as we're truly masters of our own beliefs, the claims of social epistemology are wrong, and we can fully understand how & why models are influencing us. In other words, it's an issue. Great new @rbnmckenna.bsky.social article.
Robin McKenna, Sophistry on Steroids? The Ethics, Epistemology and Politics of Persuasive AI - PhilPapers
This paper examines the ethical, epistemological, and political implications of persuasive AI technologies. Recent research suggests that AI is roughly as persuasive as humans in many contexts. Should...
philpapers.org
Reposted by Robin McKenna
lastpositivist.bsky.social
Just got an email from a scam academic journal asking if I wanted to "explore new advances in White Psychodrama" and it's just got me like: buddy, I can watch the news myself.
rbnmckenna.bsky.social
New paper w/Chris Ranalli explaining why I don't think there need be a close connection between skepticism and political conservatism. It's a critical discussion of a new book, Jonathan Ichikawa's Epistemic Courage, but we sketch our favored form of skepticism at the end.
philpapers.org/rec/MCKSAC-4
Robin McKenna & Christopher Ranalli, Skepticism and Conservatism - PhilPapers
In his excellent new book Epistemic Courage Jonathan Ichikawa argues that epistemology evinces a bias towards the skeptical. In its most extreme forms (i.e. radical skepticism), this leads to complete...
philpapers.org
rbnmckenna.bsky.social
the latter, or so he claims
Reposted by Robin McKenna
anthonymoser.com
it's a common mistake but actually Dr Frankenstein was the monster
rbnmckenna.bsky.social
Short Substack post where I explain why selective cynicism--something you see quite often on the social media feeds of heterodox academics--really annoys me.

open.substack.com/pub/rbnmcken...
Against Selective Cynicism
It won’t surprise readers of this Substack to learn that I am, at heart, a cynic and a pessimist.
open.substack.com
rbnmckenna.bsky.social
New Substack post where I talk some more about my current obsession: propaganda. This is a review of a book that I very strongly recommend, Cory Wimberly's How Propaganda Became Public Relations: Foucault and the Corporate Governance of the Public.

open.substack.com/pub/rbnmcken...
The Manufacture of Subjects
A Review of Cory Wimberly's How Propaganda Became Public Relations
open.substack.com
rbnmckenna.bsky.social
Thanks to @aidanmcglynn.bsky.social @ale1808.bsky.social @oldjerryfodor.bsky.social @neillevy.bsky.social @tays95.bsky.social @msimion.bsky.social as well as Heather Battaly, Ian James Kidd, Marie van Loon, Anne Meylan, Veli Mitova, and to my co-editor Gerry Dunne.
rbnmckenna.bsky.social
The International Journal of Philosophical Studies were kind enough to do a special issue on my book (really a hybrid: articles on ideal and non-ideal epistemology plus some critical commentaries). Thanks to everyone who contributed for making it a fantastic collection.

philpapers.org/rec/MCKIAN
Robin McKenna & Gerry Dunne, Ideal and Non-Ideal Theory in Epistemology - PhilPapers
This is the editors' introduction to a special issue on Ideal and Non-Ideal Theory in Epistemology in the International Journal of Philosophical Studies.
philpapers.org
Reposted by Robin McKenna
jakobohlhorst.bsky.social
Don't mind Robin, his book is great, and we (Nastja, Nora, and I) wouldn't have been able to make these criticisms without Robin's groundwork!
rbnmckenna.bsky.social
Good criticisms of my book on Non-Ideal Epistemology in this critical notice in Analysis. I've come to agree with a lot of the criticisms in here, so if someone wants to write a better book that does all these things please do.

academic.oup.com/analysis/adv...
Non-ideal enough?
In recent years, the traditional outlook and methods of analytic epistemology with its thought experiments, Gettierology and definition-mongering have beco
academic.oup.com
rbnmckenna.bsky.social
Good criticisms of my book on Non-Ideal Epistemology in this critical notice in Analysis. I've come to agree with a lot of the criticisms in here, so if someone wants to write a better book that does all these things please do.

academic.oup.com/analysis/adv...
Non-ideal enough?
In recent years, the traditional outlook and methods of analytic epistemology with its thought experiments, Gettierology and definition-mongering have beco
academic.oup.com
rbnmckenna.bsky.social
Thanks for writing it. I don't know if you saw, but Dan and I both did book reviews for the Australasian Journal of Philosophy. We agree (I think) that there is less disagreement between us than you might expect.
rbnmckenna.bsky.social
thanks! from a brief glance it looks like it might work well.
rbnmckenna.bsky.social
thanks this is *incredibly* useful
rbnmckenna.bsky.social
thanks! anything else that you have found works? This is for an MA seminar but experience teaches that you can't assume much prior knowledge.
rbnmckenna.bsky.social
I'm teaching a class on Philosophy and Social Change in september. It will look at different theories of and responses to social change: conservative, liberal, radical. But I'm really struggling for readings that are (a) accessible (b) high quality. Any suggestions?
Reposted by Robin McKenna
davehitchcock.bsky.social
I don't UCU post much now but I'll do one about pay for a sec, as IMV we're headed towards a predictable fail state unless people get realistic, and quick.

1. the UCEA pay offer is comically bad
2. Going out in fall on "pay" is a terrible idea
3. Go out on saving jobs and saving the sector instead
rbnmckenna.bsky.social
I wrote about epistemic trespassing and why it is bad for my Substack. Tl;dr: it is tempting to talk about it as a moral failing but I think it is often more helpful to view trespassing behaviour as a rational response to bad incentives.

rbnmckenna86.substack.com/p/what-is-wr...
What Is Wrong with Epistemic Trespassing?
Epistemic Trespassing and the Division of Cognitive Labour
rbnmckenna86.substack.com