We're no longer in a constitutional Republic and are entering an era of open dictatorial oligarchy. The neo liberal era is ending and insisting on "actually you can't have language to describe the new era, things are always the same" is the sort of obscuration that orthodox marxists do.

Rentierism has supplanted commodity production as the primary source of income for oligarchs. As well, the ideological project of the current oligarchy, yarvinism, can be literally described as technofeudal.
Things change. All is fire.

The technofuedal idea is that we're in a new era of capitalism rather than that we're not in capitalism. Capitalism changes every 30ish years and the Marxist discomfort with this in the West is used to obscure understanding the current economy rather than studying the economy of century ago

Which is to say, changing the messaging or rhetoric of feminism won't change the male resentment. Women being able to open bank accounts and whatnot is what has changed the dynamics of dating in a way that's causing loser men to fail. Incels didn't exist 70 years ago because women couldn't say no.

For my contribution to the discourse, a big part is women can live independently and choose what man to get with in a way they couldn't before. This means men have to put effort into dating in a way they never did before. So they want traditional gender roles because they can't adapt basically.

I've been wondering why the discourse doesn't talk about women going leftward. In the die linke results in Germany, it looks like young women are going left at a higher rate than men going right
Misogyny is likely a good explanation but feels a little too simple and neat to me.

And thanks snapping federal benefits will hit red states much harder since there's no state level welfare systems

Something about agriculture where it's economic benefit is invisible to non famers. Trucking, mechanics, machinists, all exist here because of agriculture. That skill base makes it easier to attract industry, this leads to the south and Midwest being more industrialized than other regions.

Medicare for All even would require armed revolution at this point. The Dems ain't gonna do shit, even if they had a super majority.

The video game is a replacement of real life which is why it attracts losers. The question people avoid is "why is the fantasy given by the game a mix of mass murder and pornography" because that would implicate a lot of men.

I'm glad at least to see some recognition that weakness defines these men rather than treating them as scary. They're video game addicts and are super big on excluding women. It's about constructing a reality for themselves as only white guys and goonbait women.

"actually you're a baby if you complain about food doubling in price"
"Actually the economy is good. Ignore all the homeless everywhere."
"You're a baby if you think overt censorship is bad. Let the state do whatever!"
You treat posters deserve violence done to you.

Who told you that? The satanists and pedophiles that run the US government? Their servants in the media? Their paid prostitutes in academia and the NGOs? It sure is convenient that every rival of America is a bad guy, isn't it? Isn't it swell that in history books, the good guys won every time?