Vladimir Bojarskich
@vbojarskich.bsky.social
360 followers 180 following 18 posts
PhD candidate - Political & Social Psychology at Uni Jena & KomRex | online hatred | morality & politics | climate change
Posts Media Videos Starter Packs
vbojarskich.bsky.social
Now, I am off on a little pilgrimage - comments are appreciated and will be answered in two weeks ✌️
📄 Full preprint here:
👉 doi.org/10.31234/osf...

#OnlineHate #MoralJudgment #PoliticalPsychology #Ideology #Preprint

7/
vbojarskich.bsky.social
Efforts to reduce online hate may need to go beyond content moderation.
They could benefit from drawing from interventions against :
▶️ Polarization
▶️ Norm misperceptions
▶️ Intergroup threat & conflict
6/
vbojarskich.bsky.social
Why?
Differences in perceived dyadic harm.
Liberals and conservatives saw different groups as more vulnerable—or more responsible for the hate.
5/
vbojarskich.bsky.social
🧠 Key finding: Contextual symmetry
Both liberals & conservatives condemned online hate more when their ideologically favored groups were targeted 📊
4/
vbojarskich.bsky.social
We tested two competing hypotheses in two preregistered experiments:
🇩🇪 N = 903 Germans
🇺🇸 N = 490 Americans
We varied the targets of hate and measured moral condemnation.
3/
vbojarskich.bsky.social
Online hate—directed at politicians, minorities, etc.—is all too common.
But do people judge it differently depending on who is targeted?
Are conservatives uniquely tolerant of online hate—or are both sides ideologically biased?
2/
vbojarskich.bsky.social
💥 New preprint out:
"Ideological (A-)Symmetries in Moral Judgments of Online Hate"
with Meltem Yucel, Lindsay Hahn, Tobias Rothmund & myself.

How do liberals & conservatives morally evaluate online hate?

👉 doi.org/10.31234/osf...
1/
vbojarskich.bsky.social
📄 Preprint (open access + data):
doi.org/10.31234/osf...

#Ukraine #PoliticalPsychology #PAC @apajournals.bsky.social

end/🧵
OSF
doi.org
vbojarskich.bsky.social
We argue:
🇷🇺 Russian disinfo campaigns likely provide narrative ground for the fear path (e.g., energy insecurity, war escalation).
&
Moral-based solidarity may stem from a consensus-driven, rally-'round-the-flag narrative in 🇩🇪 & other supporting countries.

6/
vbojarskich.bsky.social
Predictors of each path:
➡️ Fear-based: Higher conspiracy mentality, East Germany residence
➡️ Moral-based: Higher national ID, left-leaning ideology, low populist party support

5/
vbojarskich.bsky.social
Structural equation modeling (SEM) reveals:
Moral conviction ↑ solidarity
Existential fears ↓ solidarity

Different motivational pathways linked w/ different individual differences & psych. factors.

4/
vbojarskich.bsky.social
What predicts solidarity with Ukraine?
We examined, among others:

Moral conviction-based motivation

Existential fears-based motivation

Conspiracy mentality

Relative deprivation

🧠 + key individual differences

3/
vbojarskich.bsky.social
🇩🇪 In Sep 2022—amid strong support for Ukraine and record-high energy prices—we surveyed a nationally representative German sample (N = 1,210).
How do people navigate political solidarity under pressure?

2/
vbojarskich.bsky.social
📢 New publication in Peace and Conflict:
"Solidarity with Ukraine 🇺🇦? How fear- and moral-based motivations explain the psychological tug-of-war in the German public."
By @carlagrosche.bsky.social, Carolin Ziemer, myself (👈co-1st authors) & @tobiasrothmund.bsky.social
👉 doi.org/10.1037/pac0...
1/🧵
Reposted by Vladimir Bojarskich
jayvanbavel.bsky.social
We have created a free syllabus + teaching materials on the psychology of shared identities

It includes links to papers, lecture slides, chapter summaries, exams, interactive activities, educational videos & podcasts.

Please share with educators:
www.powerofusnewsletter.com/p/the-power-...
Reposted by Vladimir Bojarskich
jayvanbavel.bsky.social
Our new paper analyzes 19 predictors of climate change beliefs & action across 55 countries (N=4635)

4 predictors had consistent effects across all outcomes:
1) environmentalist identity,
2) trust in climate science,
3) internal environmental motivation,
4) the Human Development Index
Reposted by Vladimir Bojarskich
amrotella.bsky.social
1/ 🌟Paper *just* accepted @ PSPB!🌟

Does moral licensing (doing a good thing, then a less good thing) really exist??

➡️ Many failed replications. Why?
➡️ Using #metaanalysis, we put the effect to the test

🧵👇

Preprint: osf.io/preprints/ps...

#SocialPsychology #Bayesian #Theory
OSF
osf.io
Reposted by Vladimir Bojarskich
roderikrekker.bsky.social
Job alert! We are looking for two postdoctoral researchers at the intersection of political psychology, science communication, and survey methodology:
-One for my Vidi project on factual belief polarization.
-One for my starting grant on the politicization of science.

www.ru.nl/en/working-a...
Postdoc Position in Political Psychology: Polarisation, Misperceptions, and the Politicisation of Science (two) | Radboud University
Do you want to work as a Postdoc Position in Political Psychology: Polarisation, Misperceptions, and the Politicisation of Science (two) at the Nijmegen School of Management? Check our vacancy!
www.ru.nl
Reposted by Vladimir Bojarskich
alessandronai.bsky.social
📚📚📚

New book out this July with @lukotto.bsky.social & @cvargiu.bsky.social

We present a novel approach to study #NegativeCampaigning & #Incivility 🥊 ⚔️ - focusing on public perceptions and evaluations 😱😆🤢😡

Bonus: low price (~£35) & the cover is 🤘

Pre-orders from July 5: tinyurl.com/7raa9fpf
Cover of the book “The Psychology of Attack Politics
Perceptions, Evaluations and Effects” by Alessandro Nai, Lukas P. Otto, Chiara Vargiu, out in July 2025 (Routledge). The cover features a detail from a medieval painting showing people happily stabbing at each other (from the Codex Manesse, 1304-1340)
Reposted by Vladimir Bojarskich
lorenzspreen.bsky.social
I wanted to highlight key findings from our study and the replication, and how they extend to 2024.

Now it provides a systematic review of more than 600 scientific studies on the relationship between digitalization and democracy.

So what does science have to say? We actually know quite a bit: 1/5
Reposted by Vladimir Bojarskich
tomcostello.bsky.social
Last year, we published a paper showing that AI models can "debunk" conspiracy theories via personalized conversations. That paper raised a major question: WHY are the human<>AI convos so effective? In a new working paper, we have some answers.

TLDR: facts

osf.io/preprints/ps...
Reposted by Vladimir Bojarskich
abbycassario.bsky.social
How do attitudes become moralized? We find that moral conviction spreads between connected attitudes over time. + Those with highly connected belief systems (ideologues) have highly moralized belief systems!

Come see us at the moral psych pre-con poster session @spspnews.bsky.social to learn more😃
Reposted by Vladimir Bojarskich
lindaskitka.bsky.social
Congratulations to @drmorganalw.bsky.social who made this project a reality (some real heavy lifting!), and thanks to @markrubin.bsky.social for a terrific summary overview!
markrubin.bsky.social
"I have a dream..."

New work by @drmorganalw.bsky.social, @lindaskitka.bsky.social and colleagues considers how people's imagined utopias and dystopias affect their willingness to engage in social change.

Open access: doi.org/10.1111/bjso...

Few quotes...
When people think of a utopian future, what do they imagine? We examined (a) whether people's self-generated utopias differ by how much they criticize, seek to change or escape from an undesirable present; and (b) whether these distinct types of utopian thinking predict system-critical attitudes and intentions to change the status quo. Participants (N = 509) wrote about a future where a social issue they supported was resolved (e.g. economic inequality and climate change). Latent profile analysis revealed a subgroup of change-oriented utopian thinkers with lower system satisfaction and higher action intentions than the other two subgroups. Unexpectedly, the remaining profiles imagined ominous (dystopian thinkers) or ‘neutral’ (ambivalent future thinkers) futures and expressed mixed social change support. Computerized linguistic analyses further revealed that dystopian thinkers used more hopelessness-related language than change-oriented utopian thinkers. Ambivalent future thinkers were as ‘hopeless’ as dystopian thinkers but, like change-oriented utopian thinkers, used more fairness-related language. Thus, change-oriented utopian thinkers distinctly imagined a fairer—and possible—future. These results illustrate heterogeneity in how people imagine the future of their societies on specific issues. Critically, the features of these visions predict system-critical attitudes and a willingness to agitate for change.